EQT Exeter Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.

Maximum Offering of $5,000,000,000

EQT Exeter Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. is a Maryland corporation formed to invest primarily in stabilized, income-oriented commercial real estate in the United States. We are externally managed by our adviser, EQT Real Estate, LLC (“EQT Real Estate,” and in its capacity as our adviser, the “Adviser”). Our Adviser is a registered investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our Adviser is an affiliate of EQT AB (“EQT” or the “Sponsor”), a global investment organization focused on active ownership strategies. Our objective is to bring EQT Real Estate’s leading real estate investment platform, vertically integrated operator-driven approach, sector specific and “hyper local” expertise and scale to the non-listed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) industry. We made an election to be taxed as, and intend to continue to operate in a manner that will allow us to qualify as, a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2024. We are not a mutual fund and do not intend to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”).

We are offering on a continuous basis up to $5,000,000,000 in shares of common stock, consisting of up to $4,000,000,000 in shares in our primary offering and up to $1,000,000,000 in shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. We are offering to sell any combination of four classes of shares of our common stock, Class T shares, Class S shares, Class D shares and Class I shares, with a dollar value up to the maximum offering amount. The share classes in this offering have different upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and different ongoing distribution fees. Ongoing distribution fees, management fees and the performance participation allocation accrue on a class-specific basis and will impact the distributions and/or NAV of a share class. Class-specific accruals for ongoing distribution fees will normally result in different amounts of distributions with respect to certain share classes and class-specific accruals for management fees and the performance participation allocation will normally result in a different NAV with respect to certain share classes. Other than class-specific accruals, the classes of shares of our common stock have identical rights and privileges, including with respect to voting rights. The minimum initial investment to acquire Class T, Class S, Class D or Class I shares is $2,500. The purchase price per share for each class of common stock will vary and will generally equal our prior month’s net asset value (“NAV”) per share, as determined monthly, plus applicable upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees. We may offer shares at a price that we believe reflects the NAV per share of such stock more appropriately than the prior month’s NAV per share in cases where we believe there has been a material change (positive or negative) to our NAV per share since the end of the prior month. This is a “best efforts” offering, which means that the dealer manager for this offering will use its best efforts to sell shares, but is not obligated to purchase or sell any specific amount of shares in this offering. This offering will end within three years of the commencement of this offering unless extended during the pendency of a subsequent registration statement relating to a follow-on offering.

This investment involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase these securities only if you can afford the complete loss of your investment. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 38 for risks to consider before buying our shares, including:

Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Attorney General of the State of New York nor any other state securities regulator has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. Securities regulators have not passed upon whether this offering can be sold in compliance with existing or future suitability or conduct standards, including the “Regulation Best Interest” standard, to any or all purchasers.

The use of forecasts in this offering is prohibited. Any oral or written predictions about the amount or certainty of any cash benefits or tax consequences that may result from an investment in our common stock is prohibited. No one is authorized to make any statements about this offering inconsistent with those that appear in this prospectus.

The date of this prospectus is April 23, 2026

Shares of our common stock are suitable only as a long-term investment for persons of adequate financial means who do not need near-term liquidity from their investment. We do not expect there to be a public market for our shares and thus it may be difficult for you to sell your shares. On a limited basis, you may be able to have your shares repurchased through our share repurchase plan, although we are not obligated to repurchase any shares and may choose to repurchase only some, or even none, of the shares that have been requested to be repurchased in any particular month in our discretion. You should not buy shares of our common stock if you need to sell them in the near future. The minimum initial investment in shares of our common stock that we will accept for shares of our Class T, Class S, Class D or Class I common stock is $2,500.

In consideration of these factors, we require that a purchaser of shares of our common stock have either:

For purposes of determining whether you satisfy the standards above, your net worth is calculated excluding the value of your home, home furnishings and automobiles. For the purposes of these suitability standards, unless otherwise indicated, “liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth that consists of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable investments.

Certain states have established suitability standards in addition to the minimum income and net worth standards described above. Shares will be sold to investors in these states only if they meet the additional suitability standards set forth below. Certain broker-dealers selling shares in this offering may impose greater suitability standards than the minimum income and net worth standards described above and the state-specific suitability standards described below.

Alabama Investors. Alabama investors must have either (i) a minimum of $100,000 annual gross income and a net worth of $100,000, or (ii) a net worth of at least $350,000. In addition, an Alabama investor’s aggregate investment in us and other non-traded direct participation programs shall not exceed 10% of such investor’s liquid net worth at the time of investment in us. This concentration limit does not apply to investments made as a result of participation in a distribution reinvestment program nor to an investor who is an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Liquid net worth is defined as that portion of net worth consisting of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.

California Investors. Purchasers residing in California who are not “accredited investors” as defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may not invest more than 10% of their net worth in this offering.

Idaho Investors. Purchasers residing in Idaho must have either (a) a net worth of $85,000 and annual income of $85,000 or (b) a liquid net worth of $300,000. Additionally, the total investment in us shall not exceed 10% of their liquid net worth.

Iowa Investors. Purchasers residing in Iowa must have either (a) an annual gross income of at least $100,000 and a net worth of at least $100,000, or (b) a net worth of at least $350,000. In addition, the aggregate investment in this offering and in the securities of other non-publicly traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) may not exceed 10% of their liquid net worth. Purchasers who are accredited investors as defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are not subject to the foregoing concentration limit.

Kansas Investors. It is recommended by the Office of the Kansas Securities Commissioner that Kansas investors limit their aggregate investment in our securities and other similar investments to not more than 10% of their liquid net worth.

Kentucky Investors. Purchasers residing in Kentucky may not invest more than 10% of their liquid net worth in our shares or in any shares of our affiliated non-publicly traded REITs.

Maine Investors. The Maine Office of Securities recommends that an investor’s aggregate investment in this offering and other similar direct participation investments not exceed 10% of the investor’s liquid net worth.

Massachusetts Investors. Purchasers residing in Massachusetts are required to have (a) a minimum liquid net worth of at least $100,000 and a minimum annual gross income of not less than $85,000; or (b) a minimum liquid net worth of $350,000. In addition, the total investment in us, our affiliates and other non-publicly traded direct investment programs (including REITs, business development companies, oil and gas programs, equipment leasing programs and commodity pools, but excluding unregistered, federally and state exempt private offerings) may not exceed 10% of an investor’s liquid net worth. For purposes of the Massachusetts suitability standard, “liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets exclusive of home, home furnishings, and automobiles minus total liabilities) that consists of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.

Missouri Investors. Not more than 10% of any one Missouri investor’s liquid net worth shall be invested in us in compliance with 15 CSR 30-52.030(3)(a)(3).

Nebraska Investors. Purchasers residing in Nebraska who do not meet the definition of “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, must limit their aggregate investment in this offering and in the securities of other non-publicly traded direct participation programs to 10% of such investor’s net worth.

New Jersey Investors. Purchasers residing in New Jersey are required to have (a) a minimum liquid net worth of at least $100,000 and a minimum annual gross income of not less than $85,000; or (b) a minimum liquid net worth of $350,000. In addition, the total investment in us, our affiliates and other non-publicly traded direct investment programs (including REITs, business development companies, oil and gas programs, equipment leasing programs and commodity pools, but excluding unregistered, federally and state exempt private offerings) may not exceed 10% of an investor’s liquid net worth. For purposes of New Jersey’s suitability standard, “liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets exclusive of home, home furnishings, and automobiles minus total liabilities) that consists of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.

New Mexico Investors. Purchasers residing in New Mexico who are not “accredited investors” as defined by Rule 501(a) of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may not invest more than 10% of their liquid net worth in our shares, shares of our affiliates and other non-traded real estate investment trusts.

North Dakota Investors. Purchasers residing in North Dakota must have a net worth of at least ten times their investment in us.

Ohio Investors. Purchasers residing in Ohio may not invest more than 10% of their liquid net worth in us, our affiliates and other non-traded real estate investment programs. For purposes of Ohio’s suitability standard, “liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets exclusive of home, home furnishings, and automobiles minus total liabilities) that is comprised of cash, cash equivalents, and readily marketable securities. This condition does not apply, directly or indirectly, to federally covered securities. The condition also does not apply to purchasers who meet the definition of an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. 77a, as amended.

Oregon Investors. In addition to general suitability standards, non-accredited Oregon investors may not invest more than 10% of their liquid net worth in us. For purposes of Oregon’s suitability standard, “liquid net worth” is defined as an investor’s total assets (excluding home, home furnishings, and automobiles) minus total liabilities. Oregon investors who meet the definition of “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are not subject to the limitation described in this paragraph.

Pennsylvania Investors. Purchasers residing in Pennsylvania may not invest more than 10% of their net worth (exclusive of home, home furnishings, and automobiles) in us. The offer and sale of our common stock to persons in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is governed by Pennsylvania law. In addition, because the minimum offering amount is less than $333,000,000, you are cautioned to carefully evaluate our ability to fully accomplish our stated objectives, and to inquire as to the current dollar value of our subscriptions.

Puerto Rico Investors. Purchasers residing in Puerto Rico may not invest more than 10% of their liquid net worth in us, our affiliates, and in other non-traded REITs. For purposes of Puerto Rico’s suitability standard, “liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets exclusive of primary residence, home furnishings, and automobiles minus total liabilities) consisting of cash, cash equivalents, and readily marketable securities.

Tennessee Investors. Purchasers residing in Tennessee who are not “accredited investors” as defined in 17 C.F.R. § 230.501 may not invest more than 10% of their net worth in us.

Vermont Investors. Purchasers residing in Vermont who are not “accredited investors” as defined in 17 C.F.R. § 230.501 may not purchase an amount of shares in this offering that exceeds 10% of the investors’ liquid net worth. Vermont residents who are “accredited investors” as defined in 17 C.F.R. § 230.501 are not subject to the limitation described in this paragraph. For purposes of Vermont’s suitability standard, “liquid net worth” is defined as an investor’s total assets (not including home, home furnishings, or automobiles) minus total liabilities.

In the case of sales to fiduciary accounts, the minimum standards above shall be met by the beneficiary, the fiduciary, account, or, by the donor or grantor, who directly or indirectly supplies the funds to purchase the shares if the donor or grantor is the fiduciary.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted Regulation Best Interest, which establishes a standard of conduct for broker-dealers and their associated persons when making a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer. A retail customer is any natural person, or the legal representative of such person, who receives a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities from a broker-dealer and uses the recommendation primarily for personal, family or household purposes. When making such a recommendation, a broker-dealer and

its associated persons must act in such customer’s best interest at the time the recommendation is made, without placing their financial or other interest ahead of the retail customer’s interests, and should consider reasonable alternatives in determining whether the broker-dealer and its associated persons have a reasonable basis for making the recommendation. Broker-dealers are under a duty of care to evaluate other alternatives in the purchaser’s best interest and other alternatives are likely to exist. For example, investments in listed entities may be reasonable alternatives to an investment in us, and may feature characteristics like lower costs, less complexity, and lesser or different risks; transactions for listed securities involve nominal or no commissions at the time of initial purchase. This standard is different than the quantitative suitability standards we require for an investment in our shares and enhances the broker-dealer standard of conduct beyond previously existing suitability obligations. Under Regulation Best Interest, high cost, high risk and complex products may be subject to greater scrutiny by broker-dealers and their salespersons. While there have been enforcement actions brought by the SEC and FINRA regarding violations of Regulation Best Interest, the impact of Regulation Best Interest cannot be determined at this time as Regulation Best Interest became effective June 30, 2020, and limited administrative case law exists under Regulation Best Interest as of the date of this prospectus. The full scope of its applicability is uncertain.

Under SEC rules, the broker-dealer must meet four component obligations:

Our Sponsor and each person selling shares on our behalf must make every reasonable effort to determine that the purchase of shares of our common stock is a suitable and appropriate investment for each investor. In making this determination, our Sponsor and the dealer manager will rely upon information provided by the investor to the selected dealer as well as the suitability assessment made by each selected dealer. Before you purchase shares of our common stock, your selected dealer, authorized representative or other person placing shares on your behalf will rely on relevant information provided by you to determine that you:

Selected dealers are required to maintain for six years records of the information used to determine that an investment in shares of our common stock is suitable and appropriate for a stockholder.

By signing the subscription agreement required for purchases of our common stock, you represent and warrant to us that you have received a copy of this prospectus and that you meet the net worth and annual gross income requirements described above. By making these representations, you do not waive any rights that you may have under federal or state securities laws.

About this Prospectus

Please carefully read the information in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplements, which we refer to collectively as the “prospectus.” You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. This prospectus may only be used where it is legal to sell these securities. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of any date later than the date hereof or such other dates as are stated herein or as of the respective dates of any documents or other information incorporated herein by reference.

The words “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer to EQT Exeter Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including EQT Exeter REIT Operating Partnership LP (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership of which we are the general partner, unless the context requires otherwise.

Unless otherwise noted, numerical information relating to our Adviser, EQT Real Estate, and our Sponsor, EQT, is approximate, and is as of December 31, 2025.

Citations included herein to industry sources are used only to demonstrate third-party support for certain statements made herein to which such citations relate. Information included in such industry sources that does not relate to supporting the related statements made herein is not part of this prospectus and should not be relied upon.

Clarity of the text in this prospectus may be affected by the size of the screen on which it is displayed.

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements about our business, including, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and objectives. You can generally identify forward-looking statements by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue” or other similar words. These statements include our plans and objectives for future operations, including plans and objectives relating to future growth and availability of funds, and are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to these statements involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to accurately predict and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements, and the forward-looking statements themselves, are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate and our actual results, performance and achievements may be materially different from that expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in these forward-looking statements, the inclusion of this information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans, which we consider to be reasonable, will be achieved.

You should carefully review the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus for a discussion of the risks and uncertainties that we believe are material to our business, operating results, prospects and financial condition. Except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, we do not undertake to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Risk Factors

An investment in shares of our common stock involves risks. You should specifically consider the following material risks in addition to the other information contained in this prospectus before you decide to purchase shares of our common stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks might cause you to lose a significant part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties discussed below are not the only ones we face, but do represent all known risks and uncertainties that we believe are material to our business, operating results, financial condition, prospects and forward-looking statements.

Risks Related to This Offering and Our Organizational Structure

We have a limited operating history, and there is no assurance that we will be able to achieve our investment objectives.

EQT Exeter Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. has a limited operating history. We may not be able to achieve our investment objectives. As of the date of this prospectus, we have acquired five properties. We cannot assure you that the past experiences of our Adviser or its affiliates will be sufficient to allow us to achieve our investment objectives. As a result, an investment in our shares of common stock entails more risk than the shares of common stock of a REIT with a substantial operating history.

This is a blind-pool offering, and thus you will not have the opportunity to evaluate our future investments before we make them, which makes your investment more speculative.

We are not able to provide you with any information to assist you in evaluating the merits of any specific properties or real estate related securities that we may acquire in the future, except for investments that may be described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. We will seek to invest substantially all of the net proceeds from our offerings, after the payment of fees and expenses, in the acquisition of or investment in interests in properties and real estate related securities. However, because you will be unable to evaluate the economic merit of our future investments before we make them, you will have to rely entirely on the ability of our Adviser to select suitable and successful investment opportunities. Furthermore, our Adviser has broad discretion in selecting the types of properties we will invest in and the tenants of those properties, and you will not have the opportunity to evaluate potential investments. These factors increase the risk that your investment may not generate returns comparable to other real estate investment alternatives.

There is no public trading market for shares of our common stock; therefore, your ability to dispose of your shares will likely be limited to repurchase by us. If you do sell your shares to us, you may receive less than the price you paid.

There is no current public trading market for shares of our common stock, and we do not expect that such a market will ever develop. Therefore, the repurchase of shares by us will likely be the only way for you to dispose of your shares. We will repurchase shares at a price equal to the transaction price of the class of shares being repurchased on the date of repurchase (which will generally be equal to our prior month’s NAV per share) and not based on the price at which you initially purchased your shares. Subject to limited exceptions, shares repurchased within one year of the date of issuance will be repurchased at 98% of the transaction price. As a result, you may receive less than the price you paid for your shares when you sell them to us pursuant to our share repurchase plan. See “Share Repurchases—Early Repurchase Deduction.”

Your ability to have your shares repurchased through our share repurchase plan is limited. We may choose to repurchase fewer shares than have been requested to be repurchased, in our discretion at any time, and the amount of shares we may repurchase is subject to caps. Further, our board of directors may make exceptions to, modify or suspend our share repurchase plan if it deems such action to be in our best interest.

We may choose to repurchase fewer shares than have been requested in any particular month to be repurchased under our share repurchase plan, or none at all, in our discretion at any time. We may repurchase fewer shares than have been requested to be repurchased due to lack of readily available funds, the need to maintain liquidity for our operations or because we have determined that investing in real property or other illiquid investments is a better use of our capital than repurchasing our shares. In addition, the aggregate NAV of total repurchases of Class T, Class S, Class D, Class I ,Class E, Class A-I and Class A-II shares (including repurchases at certain non-U.S. investor access funds primarily created to hold shares of our common stock, if any, but excluding any Early Repurchase Deduction applicable to the repurchased shares) is limited, in any calendar month, to no more than 2% of our aggregate NAV (measured using the aggregate NAV attributable to stockholders as of the end of the immediately preceding month) and, in any calendar quarter, to shares whose aggregate value is no more than 5% of our aggregate NAV (measured using the average aggregate NAV attributable to stockholders at the end of the immediately preceding three months).

EQT Real Estate Holdings and affiliates of our Sponsor and their officers and employees purchasing Class E shares and Class E units in satisfaction of the Sponsor Committed Amount must agree to hold all such shares and units they acquire until the earlier of (i) the first date that the aggregate NAV of our outstanding shares of common stock, along with Operating Partnership units held by

parties other than us, reaches $1.0 billion and (ii) March 19, 2027, which is three years from the date of the initial investment by EQT Real Estate Holdings. Following such date, holders of Class E shares and Class E units purchased in connection with the Sponsor Committed Amount may request that we repurchase such Class E shares or Class E units; provided, that (1) we will only process repurchases of such Class E shares or Class E units for cash after all other stockholder repurchase requests have been processed, (2) such repurchases of Class E shares for cash will be subject to the 2% monthly and 5% quarterly limitations on repurchases and (3) upon a repurchase request, the Operating Partnership will repurchase Class E units for Class E shares or cash (at the holder’s election) unless our board of directors determines that any such repurchase for cash would be prohibited by applicable law or the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, in which case such Class E units will be repurchased for an amount of Class E shares with an aggregate NAV equivalent to the aggregate NAV of such Class E units; provided further, that repurchases of Class E units for cash will be subject to the 2% monthly and 5% quarterly limitations on repurchases in our share repurchase plan treating all outstanding Operating Partnership units held by persons other than us as having been exchanged for shares as of the respective monthly and quarterly measurement dates for calculation of the 2% monthly and 5% quarterly limitations in our share repurchase plan. For the avoidance of doubt, repurchases of Class E units for Class E shares will not be subject to the requirement that all other stockholder repurchase requests submitted through our share repurchase plan have been processed and will not be subject to the 2% monthly and 5% quarterly limitations on repurchases. Repurchases of Class E shares and Class E units acquired in connection with the Sponsor Committed Amount will not be subject to the Early Repurchase Deduction.

Shares held by our Adviser acquired as payment of our Adviser’s management fee will not be subject to our share repurchase plan, including with respect to any repurchase limits or the Early Repurchase Deduction, and will not be included in the calculation of our aggregate NAV for purposes of the 2% monthly or 5% quarterly limitations on repurchases. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we have adopted a policy that requires the affiliated-transactions committee to approve any repurchase request of the Adviser for Class E shares received as payment for the management fee that, when combined with any stockholder repurchase requests submitted through our share repurchase plan, would cause us to exceed the 2% monthly or 5% quarterly repurchase limitations of our share repurchase plan. Such approval must find that the repurchase will not impair our capital or operations and is consistent with the fiduciary duties of our independent directors.

In addition, holders of Class E units issued in connection with distributions on the performance participation interest may request the Operating Partnership repurchase such Class E units for Class E shares or cash (at the holder’s election) unless our board of directors determines that any such repurchase for cash would be prohibited by applicable law or the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, in which case such Class E units will be repurchased for an amount of Class E shares with an aggregate NAV equivalent to the aggregate NAV of such Class E units; provided further, that repurchases of Class E units for cash will be subject to the 2% monthly and 5% quarterly limitations on repurchases in our share repurchase plan treating all outstanding Operating Partnership units held by persons other than us as having been exchanged for our shares as of the respective monthly and quarterly measurement dates for calculation of the 2% monthly and 5% quarterly limitations under the share repurchase plan. In addition, any repurchases of Class E units in respect of distributions on the performance participation interest will not be subject to the Early Repurchase Deduction.

Our board of directors may make exceptions to, modify or suspend our share repurchase plan if in its reasonable judgment it deems such action to be in our best interest. Our board of directors will not terminate our share repurchase plan absent a liquidity event which results in our stockholders receiving cash or securities listed on a national securities exchange or where otherwise required by law. If the full amount of all shares of our common stock requested to be repurchased in any given month are not repurchased, funds will be allocated pro rata based on the total number of shares of common stock being repurchased without regard to class and subject to the volume limitation. All unsatisfied repurchase requests must be resubmitted after the start of the next month or quarter, or upon the recommencement of the share repurchase plan, as applicable.

The vast majority of our assets will consist of properties that cannot generally be readily liquidated without impacting our ability to realize full value upon their disposition. Therefore, we may not always have a sufficient amount of cash to satisfy repurchase requests. Should repurchase requests, in our judgment, place an undue burden on our liquidity, adversely affect our operations or risk having an adverse impact on our Company as a whole, or should we otherwise determine that investing our liquid assets in real properties or other illiquid investments rather than repurchasing our shares is in the best interests of our Company as a whole, then we may choose to repurchase fewer shares than have been requested to be repurchased, or none at all. Because we are not required to authorize the recommencement of the share repurchase plan within any specified period of time, we may effectively terminate the plan by suspending it indefinitely. As a result, your ability to have your shares repurchased by us may be limited and at times you may not be able to liquidate your investment. See “Share Repurchases—Repurchase Limitations.”

Economic events that may cause our stockholders to request that we repurchase their shares may materially adversely affect our cash flow and our results of operations and financial condition.

Events affecting the U.S. economy, such as the general negative performance of the real estate sector or market volatility (including as a result of uncertainties regarding actual and potential shifts in U.S. and foreign policies on trade and other fiscal, monetary and regulatory policies, including with respect to treaties and tariffs, trade disputes between the U.S. and foreign trading partners, inflationary pressures, elevated interest rates, ongoing conflicts such as in the Middle East and other geopolitical events generally), may be prolonged and severe and could cause our stockholders to seek to sell their shares to us pursuant to our share repurchase plan at a time when such events are adversely affecting the performance of our assets. If we decide to satisfy all or a large amount of repurchase requests, our cash flow and liquidity could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if we determine to sell assets to satisfy repurchase requests, we may not be able to realize the return on such assets that we may have been able to achieve had we sold at a more favorable time, and our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Our Adviser manages our portfolio pursuant to very broad investment guidelines and is not required to seek the approval of our board of directors for each investment, financing or asset allocation decision made by it, which may result in our making riskier investments and which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our board of directors has approved very broad investment guidelines that delegate to our Adviser the authority to execute acquisitions and dispositions of real estate and real estate related securities on our behalf, in each case so long as such investments are consistent with our board-approved investment guidelines and our charter. Our board of directors will review our investment guidelines on an annual basis (or more often as it deems appropriate) and review our investment portfolio periodically. Transactions entered into on our behalf by our Adviser may be costly, difficult or impossible to unwind when they are subsequently reviewed by our board of directors.

Uncertainty about U.S. federal initiatives could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There is significant uncertainty with respect to legislation, regulation and government policy at the federal level, as well as the state and local levels. Recent events have created a climate of heightened uncertainty and introduced new and difficult-to-quantify macroeconomic and political risks with potentially far-reaching implications. The current U.S. presidential administration’s changes to U.S. policy may impact, among other things, the U.S. and global economy, international trade and relations, unemployment, immigration, taxes, healthcare, the U.S. regulatory environment, inflation and other areas. Although we cannot predict the impact, if any, of these changes to our business, they could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Until we know what policy changes are made and how those changes impact our business and the business of our competitors over the long term, we will not know the impact of them.

We face risks associated with the deployment of our capital.

In light of the nature of our continuous offerings, there could be a delay between the time we receive net offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock and the time we invest the net proceeds. Pending investment, we may hold large amounts of cash in money market accounts or similar temporary investments, which are subject to the management fee.

It is not anticipated that the temporary investment of such cash into money market accounts or other similar temporary investments pending deployment into investments will generate significant interest, and investors should understand that such low interest payments on the temporarily invested cash may adversely affect overall returns. In the event we fail to timely invest the net proceeds of sales of our common stock or do not deploy sufficient capital to meet our targeted leverage, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

If we are unable to raise substantial funds, we will be limited in the number and type of investments we make, and the value of your investment in us will be more dependent on the performance of any of the specific assets we acquire.

Our offerings are being made on a “best efforts” basis, meaning that our dealer manager, EQT Partners BD, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), is only required to use its best efforts to sell our shares and has no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any shares. As a result, the amount of proceeds we raise in this offering and our private offerings may be substantially less than the amount we would need to achieve a broader portfolio of investments. If we are unable to raise substantial funds, we will make fewer investments, resulting in less breadth in terms of the type, number, geography and size of investments that we make. In that case, the likelihood that any single asset’s performance would adversely affect our profitability will increase. There is a greater risk that you will lose money in your investment if we have less breadth in our portfolio. Further, we will have certain fixed operating expenses, including expenses of being a public reporting company, regardless of whether we are able to raise substantial funds. Our inability to raise substantial funds would increase our fixed operating expenses as a percentage of gross income, reducing our net income and limiting our ability to make distributions.

We may change our investment and operational policies without stockholder consent.

Except for changes to the investment restrictions contained in our charter, which require stockholder consent to amend, we may change our investment and operational policies, including our policies with respect to investments, operations, indebtedness, capitalization and distributions, at any time without the consent of our stockholders, which could result in our making investments that are different from, and possibly riskier or more highly leveraged than, the types of investments described in this prospectus. Our board of directors has approved very broad investment guidelines with which we must comply, but these guidelines provide our Adviser with broad discretion and can be changed by our board of directors. A change in our investment strategy may, among other things, increase our exposure to real estate market fluctuations, default risk and interest rate risk, all of which could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition. We will notify stockholders of any material change to our investment and operational policies by disclosing such changes in a public filing such as a supplement to the prospectus, a current report on Form 8‑K and/or a periodic report on Form 10‑Q or Form 10‑K, as appropriate.

The amount and source of distributions we may make to our stockholders is uncertain, and we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations to make distributions to our stockholders at any time in the future.

We have not established a minimum distribution payment level, and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the risk factors described in this prospectus. We have a limited operating history, and we may not generate sufficient income to make distributions to our stockholders. Our board of directors will make determinations regarding distributions based upon, among other factors, our financial performance, debt service obligations, debt covenants, REIT qualification and tax requirements and capital expenditure requirements. Among the factors that could impair our ability to make distributions to our stockholders are:

As a result, we may not be able to make distributions to our stockholders at any time in the future, and the level of any distributions we do make to our stockholders may not increase or even be maintained over time, any of which could materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.

We may pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, including, without limitation, the sale or repayment of our assets, borrowings, return of capital, offering proceeds or the temporary deferral or waiver of fees and expense reimbursements (including the payment of fees with shares of our stock), and we have no limits on the amounts we may pay from such sources.

We may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fully fund distributions to stockholders. Therefore, we may fund distributions to our stockholders from sources other than cash flow from operations, including, without limitation, the sale or repayment of our assets, borrowings, return of capital, offering proceeds or the temporary deferral or waiver of fees and expense reimbursements (including the payment of fees with shares of our stock). The extent to which we pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations will depend on various factors, including the level of participation in our distribution reinvestment plan, the extent to which our Adviser elects to receive its management fee in Class E shares or Class E units, the extent to which the Special Limited Partner elects to receive distributions on its performance participation interest in Class E units, how quickly we invest the proceeds from our offerings and the performance of our investments. Funding distributions from the sale of or repayment of our assets, borrowings, return of capital, offering proceeds or the temporary deferral or waiver of fees and expense reimbursements will result in us having less funds available to acquire properties or other real estate related securities. As a result, the return you realize on your investment may be reduced. Funding distributions from such sources may also negatively impact our ability to generate cash flows. Likewise, funding distributions from the sale of additional securities will dilute your interest in us on a percentage basis and may impact the value of your investment especially if we sell these securities at prices less than the price you paid for your shares. We may be required to continue to fund our regular distributions from a combination of some of these sources if our investments fail to perform, if expenses are greater than our revenues or due to numerous other factors. We have not established a limit on the amount of our distributions that may be paid from any of these sources.

To the extent we borrow funds to pay distributions, we would incur borrowing costs and these borrowings would require a future repayment. The use of these sources for distributions and the ultimate repayment of any liabilities incurred could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions in future periods, decrease our NAV, decrease the amount of cash we have available for operations and new investments and adversely impact the value of your investment.

We may also defer operating expenses or pay expenses (including the fees of our Adviser or distributions to the Special Limited Partner if so requested by them) with shares of our common stock or Operating Partnership units in order to preserve cash flow for the payment of distributions and thereby indirectly support distribution payments. Such temporary deferral or waiver of expenses, which are subject to reimbursement to our Adviser, may have a smoothing effect on our NAV and our distribution rate. The ultimate repayment of these deferred expenses could adversely affect our operations and reduce the future return on your investment. Further, we may repurchase shares or redeem Operating Partnership units from our Adviser or the Special Limited Partner shortly after issuing such shares or units as compensation. The payment of expenses in shares of our common stock or with Operating Partnership units will dilute your ownership interest in our portfolio of assets. Except as discussed in “Management—The Advisory Agreement—Management Fee, Performance Participation and Expense Reimbursements—Adviser Support,” there is no guarantee any of our operating expenses will be deferred and our Adviser and Special Limited Partner are under no obligation to receive future fees or distributions in shares of our common stock or Operating Partnership units and may elect to receive such amounts in cash.

Purchases and repurchases of shares of our common stock are generally made based on the prior month’s NAV per share of our common stock.

Generally, our offering price per share and the price at which we make repurchases of our shares will equal the NAV per share of the applicable class as of the last calendar day of the prior month, plus, in the case of our offering price, applicable upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees. The NAV per share, if calculated as of the date on which you make your subscription request or repurchase request, may be significantly different than the transaction price you pay or the repurchase price you receive. Certain of our investments or liabilities may be subject to high levels of volatility from time to time and could change in value significantly between the end of the prior month as of which our NAV is determined and the date that you acquire or repurchase our shares; however, the prior month’s NAV per share will generally continue to be used as the transaction price per share and repurchase price per share.

Valuations and appraisals of our real estate and real estate related securities are estimates of fair value and may not necessarily correspond to realizable value.

For the purposes of calculating our monthly NAV, our properties will generally initially be valued at cost, which we expect to represent fair value at that time. Each property will then be valued by an independent third-party appraisal firm within the first three full months after acquisition and no less frequently than annually thereafter. Additionally, each month after the initial third-party appraisal, our Independent Valuation Advisor will provide a restricted appraisal report for any real property that was not the subject of a third-party appraisal report during that month. All appraisals are reviewed by our Adviser, and our Independent Valuation Advisor will review all annual independent third-party appraisals as described below. We expect our Adviser to calculate the fair value of our other assets and liabilities, though our Adviser may retain additional third parties to assist with our valuations of certain investments. Investments in real estate related securities with readily available market quotations will be valued monthly at fair market value. Certain investments in real estate related securities are unlikely to have market quotations. Each such investment will generally initially be valued at the acquisition price and then be valued by our Adviser within the first three full months after we invest in such investment and no less than quarterly thereafter. Additionally, our Adviser may in its discretion consider material market data and other information that becomes available after the end of the applicable month in valuing our assets and liabilities and calculating our NAV for a particular month. For more information regarding our valuation process, see “Net Asset Value Calculation and Valuation Guidelines.”

In conducting their investigations and analyses, our Independent Valuation Advisor and other independent third-party appraisal firms will take into account customary and accepted financial and commercial procedures and considerations as they deem relevant, which may include, without limitation, the review of documents, materials and information relevant to valuing the property that are provided by us or our Adviser, such as (i) historical operating revenues and expenses of the property; (ii) lease agreements on the property; (iii) the revenues and expenses of the property; (iv) information regarding recent or planned estimated capital expenditures; and (v) any other information relevant to valuing the real estate property. Although our Independent Valuation Advisor and other independent third-party appraisal firms may review information supplied or otherwise made available by us or our Adviser for reasonableness, they will assume and rely upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information and of all information supplied or otherwise made available to them by any other party, and will not undertake any duty or responsibility to verify independently any of such information. Our Independent Valuation Advisor will not make or obtain an independent valuation or appraisal of any of our other assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) other than our real properties.

Within the parameters of our valuation guidelines, the valuation methodologies used to value our properties and certain of our investments will involve subjective judgments and projections and may not be accurate. Valuation methodologies will also involve assumptions and opinions about future events, which may not turn out to be correct. Valuations and appraisals of our properties and other investments will be only estimates of fair value. Ultimate realization of the value of an asset depends to a great extent on economic, market and other conditions beyond our control and the control of our Adviser. Further, valuations do not necessarily

represent the price at which an asset would sell, since market prices of assets can only be determined by negotiation between a willing buyer and seller. As such, the carrying value of an asset may not reflect the price at which the asset could be sold in the market, and the difference between carrying value and the ultimate sales price could be material. In addition, accurate valuations are more difficult to obtain in times of low transaction volume because there are fewer market transactions that can be considered in the context of the appraisal. There will be no retroactive adjustment in the valuation of such assets, the offering price of our shares of common stock, the price we paid to repurchase shares of our common stock or NAV-based fees we paid to our Adviser and the Dealer Manager to the extent such valuations prove not to reflect accurately the realizable value of our assets. Even if our valuation estimates are accurate when made, because the price you will pay for shares of our common stock in this offering, and the price at which your shares may be repurchased by us pursuant to our share repurchase plan are generally based on our prior month’s NAV per share, you may pay more than realizable value or receive less than realizable value for your investment.

It may be difficult to reflect, fully and accurately, material events that may impact our monthly NAV.

Our Adviser’s determination of our monthly NAV per share will be based in part on appraisals of each of our properties provided annually by independent third-party appraisal firms in individual appraisal reports reviewed by our Independent Valuation Advisor, restricted appraisal reports for any real property that was not the subject of a third-party appraisal report during that month provided by our Independent Valuation Advisor, to the extent available monthly valuations of investments in real estate related securities based on readily available market quotations and quarterly valuations of our real estate related securities for which market prices are not readily available provided by our Adviser, each in accordance with valuation guidelines approved by our board of directors. As a result, our published NAV per share in any given month may not fully reflect any or all changes in value that may have occurred since the most recent appraisal or valuation. Our Adviser will review appraisal reports and monitor our properties and real estate related securities, and is responsible for notifying the Independent Valuation Advisor of the occurrence of any property-specific or market-driven event it believes may cause a material valuation change in the real estate valuation, but it may be difficult to reflect fully and accurately rapidly changing market conditions or material events that may impact the value of our real estate and real estate related securities or liabilities between valuations, or to obtain complete information regarding any such events in a timely manner. For example, an unexpected termination or renewal of a material lease, a material increase or decrease in vacancies or an unanticipated structural or environmental event at a property may cause the value of a property to change materially, yet obtaining sufficient relevant information after the occurrence has come to light or analyzing fully the financial impact of such an event may be difficult to do and may require some time. As a result, the NAV per share may not reflect a material event until such time as sufficient information is available and analyzed, and the financial impact is fully evaluated, such that our NAV may be appropriately adjusted in accordance with our valuation guidelines. Depending on the circumstance, the resulting potential disparity in our NAV may be in favor or to the detriment of either stockholders whose shares we repurchase, or stockholders who buy new shares.

NAV calculations are not governed by governmental or independent securities, financial or accounting rules or standards.

The methods used by our Adviser and State Street Bank and Trust Company to calculate our NAV, including the components used in calculating our NAV, are not prescribed by rules of the SEC or any other regulatory agency. Further, there are no accounting rules or standards that prescribe which components should be used in calculating NAV, and our NAV is not audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. We calculate and publish our NAV solely for purposes of establishing the price at which we sell and repurchase shares of our common stock, and you should not view our NAV as a measure of our future financial condition or performance. The components and methodology used in calculating our NAV may differ from those used by other companies now or in the future.

In addition, calculations of our NAV, to the extent that they incorporate valuations of our assets and liabilities, are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. These valuations may differ from liquidation values that could be realized in the event that we were forced to sell assets.

Additionally, errors may occur in calculating our NAV, which could impact the price at which we sell and repurchase shares of our common stock and the amount of our Adviser’s management fee and the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest. You should carefully review the disclosure of our valuation policies and how NAV will be calculated under “Net Asset Value Calculation and Valuation Guidelines.”

If we quickly raise a substantial amount of capital, we may have difficulty investing it in a timely manner.

If we quickly raise offering proceeds, we may have difficulty identifying and purchasing suitable investments on attractive terms. Therefore, there could be a delay between the time we receive net offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock and the time we invest the net proceeds. This could cause a substantial delay in the time it takes for your investment to generate returns and could adversely affect our ability to pay regular distributions of cash flow from operations to you. If we fail to invest the net offering proceeds of the offerings promptly, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners in our Operating Partnership whose interests may not be aligned with those of our stockholders.

Our directors and officers have duties to our Company and our stockholders under Maryland law and our charter in connection with their management of our Company. At the same time, we, as general partner, have fiduciary duties under Delaware law to our Operating Partnership and to the limited partners in connection with the management of our Operating Partnership. Our duties as general partner of our Operating Partnership and to its partners may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to our Company and our stockholders. Under Delaware law, a general partner of a Delaware limited partnership owes its limited partners the duties of good faith and fair dealing. Other duties, including fiduciary duties, may be modified or eliminated in the partnership’s partnership agreement. The partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership provides that, if we own a controlling interest in our Operating Partnership, any conflict that cannot be resolved in a manner not adverse to either our stockholders or the limited partners may be resolved in favor of our stockholders.

Additionally, to the extent permitted by our charter, the partnership agreement expressly limits our liability, and provides for our indemnification, by providing that we and our officers, directors, employees and designees will not be liable to, and will be indemnified by, our Operating Partnership for losses of any nature unless it is established that: (1) the act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith, was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty or constituted willful misconduct or gross negligence; (2) the indemnified party received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or (3) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the indemnified person had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. For a discussion of the indemnification provisions of our charter, see “Management—Limited Liability and Indemnification of Directors, Officers, our Adviser and Others.”

The provisions of Delaware law that allow the fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been tested in a court of law, and we have not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict our fiduciary duties.

Payments to our Adviser or the Special Limited Partner in the form of common stock or Operating Partnership units they elect to receive in lieu of fees or distributions will dilute future cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Our Adviser or the Special Limited Partner may choose to receive our common stock or Operating Partnership units in lieu of certain fees or distributions. The holders of all Operating Partnership units are entitled to receive cash from operations pro rata with the distributions being paid to us and such distributions to the holder of the Operating Partnership units will reduce the cash available for distribution to us and to our stockholders. Furthermore, under certain circumstances the Operating Partnership units held by our Adviser or held in connection with distributions on the performance participation interest are required to be repurchased, in cash at the holder’s election, and there may not be sufficient cash to make such a repurchase payment; therefore, we may need to use cash from operations, borrowings, offering proceeds or other sources to make the payment, which will reduce cash available for distribution to you or for investment in our operations. Repurchases of our shares or Operating Partnership units from our Adviser paid to our Adviser as a management fee are not subject to the monthly and quarterly volume limitations or the Early Repurchase Deduction, and such repurchases receive priority over other shares being put for repurchase during such period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we have adopted a policy that requires the affiliated-transactions committee to approve any repurchase request of the Adviser for Class E shares received as payment for the management fee that, when combined with any stockholder repurchase requests submitted through our share repurchase plan, would cause us to exceed the 2% monthly or 5% quarterly repurchase limitations of our share repurchase plan. Such approval must find that the repurchase will not impair our capital or operations and is consistent with the fiduciary duties of our independent directors.

In addition, holders of Class E units issued in connection with distributions on the performance participation interest may request the Operating Partnership repurchase such Class E units for Class E shares or cash (at the holder’s election) unless our board of directors determines that any such repurchase for cash would be prohibited by applicable law or the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, in which case such Class E units will be repurchased for an amount of Class E shares with an aggregate NAV equivalent to the aggregate NAV of such Class E units; provided further, that repurchases of Class E units for cash will be subject to the 2% monthly and 5% quarterly limitations on repurchases in the share repurchase plan treating all outstanding Operating Partnership units held by persons other than us as having been exchanged for our shares as of the respective monthly and quarterly measurement dates for calculation of the 2% monthly and 5% quarterly limitations under the share repurchase plan. In addition, any repurchases of Class E units in respect of distributions on the performance participation interest will not be subject to the Early Repurchase Deduction.

The Dealer Manager has a limited operating history. The Dealer Manager may not be able to build and maintain a network of licensed broker-dealers, which failure could have a material adverse effect on our business and this offering.

We have retained the Dealer Manager, an affiliate of our Adviser, to conduct this offering and our private offerings. The Dealer Manager has a limited operating history, and this offering is the first offering conducted by the Dealer Manager. The success of this offering, and our ability to implement our business strategy, is dependent upon the ability of the Dealer Manager to build and maintain a network of licensed securities broker-dealers to sell our shares to their clients. If the Dealer Manager is not successful in establishing, operating and managing a sufficient network of selected dealers to distribute shares in this offering, our ability to raise proceeds through this offering will be limited and our investment strategy may be adversely affected. In addition, the Dealer Manager serves as a broker-dealer for other issuers that are our affiliates and may do so in the future. As a result, the Dealer Manager may experience conflicts of interest in allocating its time between (i) this offering and our private offerings, on the one hand, and (ii) such other or future offerings, on the other, which could adversely affect our ability to raise proceeds through this offering and our private offerings as well as implement our investment strategy. Further, the selected dealers retained by the Dealer Manager may have numerous competing investment products, some with similar or identical investment strategies and areas of focus as us, which they may elect to emphasize to their retail clients.

You will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review in connection with this offering and, if a conflict of interest arises between us and our Adviser or the Dealer Manager, we may incur additional fees and expenses.

Because our Adviser and the Dealer Manager are affiliates of EQT, our Sponsor, you will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by an unaffiliated, independent underwriter and its counsel in connection with a securities offering. If any situation arises in which our interests are in conflict with those of our Adviser, the Dealer Manager or its affiliates, and we are required to retain independent counsel, we will incur additional fees and expenses.

Our board of directors may, in the future, adopt certain measures under Maryland law without stockholder approval that may have the effect of making it less likely that a stockholder would receive a “control premium” for his or her shares.

Corporations organized under Maryland law with a class of registered securities and at least three independent directors are permitted to elect to be subject, by a charter or bylaw provision or a resolution of its board of directors and notwithstanding any contrary charter or bylaw provision, to any or all of five provisions:

These provisions may discourage an extraordinary transaction, such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, all of which might provide a premium price for stockholders’ shares. In our charter, we have elected that vacancies on our board of directors be filled only by the remaining directors and for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred. Through other provisions in our charter and bylaws, we vest in our board of directors the exclusive power to fix the number of directorships, provided that the number is not less than three. We have not elected to be subject to any of the other provisions described above, but our charter does not prohibit our board of directors from opting into any of these provisions in the future.

We will not elect to be subject to any provision of Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) if doing so would adversely affect the rights, preferences and privileges of stockholders unless such election would be of no force or effect following a vote of the stockholders to ratify such election if such vote failed to garner the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the matter. We will use our best efforts to hold such stockholders’ meeting as soon as possible following such election but may adjourn or postpone the meeting to solicit additional votes if at the time of such adjournment or postponement a majority of the shares represented by proxy have indicated support for such election.

Further, under the Maryland Business Combination Act, we may not engage in any merger or other business combination with an “interested stockholder” (which is defined as (1) any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock and (2) an affiliate or associate of ours who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding stock) or any affiliate of that interested stockholder for a period of five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder. A person is not an interested stockholder if our board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which he would otherwise have become an interested stockholder. In approving a transaction, our board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms or conditions determined by our board of directors. After the five-year period ends, any merger or other business combination with the interested stockholder or any affiliate of the interested stockholder must be recommended by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:

These supermajority voting provisions do not apply if, among other things, our stockholders receive a minimum price (as defined in the MGCL) for their common stock and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder.

The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by our board of directors prior to the time the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Our board of directors has adopted a resolution exempting any business combination involving us and any person, including our Adviser, the Dealer Manager and EQT, from the provisions of this law, provided that such business combination is first approved by our board of directors; however, our board may revoke this exemption at any time.

Our charter permits our board of directors to authorize us to issue preferred stock on terms that may subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock or discourage a third party from acquiring us.

Our board of directors is permitted, subject to certain restrictions set forth in our charter, to authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval. Further, our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock into other classes or series of stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms or conditions of redemption of the stock and may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we have authority to issue without stockholder approval. Thus, our board of directors could authorize us to issue shares of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could subordinate the rights of the holders of our common stock or have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.

Maryland law and our organizational documents limit our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover claims against our directors and officers, which could reduce your and our recovery against them if they cause us to incur losses.

Maryland law provides that a director will not have any liability as a director so long as he or she performs his or her duties in accordance with the applicable standard of conduct. In addition, our charter generally limits the personal liability of our directors and officers for monetary damages subject to the limitations of the North American Securities Administrators Association’s Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts, as revised and adopted on May 7, 2007 (the “NASAA REIT Guidelines”), and Maryland law. Maryland law and our charter provide that no director or officer shall be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages unless the director or officer (1) actually received an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (2) was actively and deliberately dishonest as established by a final judgment as material to the cause of action. Moreover, our charter generally requires us to indemnify and advance expenses to our directors and officers for losses they may incur by reason of their service in those capacities unless their act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, they actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, they had reasonable cause to believe the act or omission was unlawful. Further, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our officers and directors. As a result, you and we may have more limited rights against our directors or officers than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce your and our recovery from these persons if they act in a manner that causes us to incur losses. In addition, we are obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by these persons in some cases. However, our charter provides that we may not indemnify our directors or officers, or our Adviser and its affiliates, for any liability or loss suffered by them or hold our directors or officers, our Adviser and its affiliates harmless for any liability or loss suffered by us, unless they have determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct that caused the

loss or liability was in our best interests, they were acting on our behalf or performing services for us, the liability or loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by our non-independent directors, our Adviser and its affiliates, or gross negligence or willful misconduct by our independent directors, and the indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of our net assets and not from the stockholders. See “Management—Limited Liability and Indemnification of Directors, Officers, our Adviser and Others.”

Your interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares. Your interest in our assets will also be diluted if the Operating Partnership issues additional units.

Holders of our common stock will not have preemptive rights to any shares we issue in the future. Our charter authorizes us to issue up to 2,300,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 2,200,000,000 shares are classified as common stock, of which 500,000,000 shares are classified as Class T shares, 500,000,000 shares are classified as Class S shares, 500,000,000 shares are classified as Class D shares, 500,000,000 shares are classified as Class I shares, 100,000,000 shares are classified as Class E shares, 50,000,000 are classified as Class A-I shares and 50,000,000 are classified as Class A-II shares, and 100,000,000 shares are classified as preferred stock, of which 220 shares are classified as Class A shares. In addition to this offering, we have and may in the future issue additional shares in private offerings and have and may in the future issue Operating Partnership units to holders other than us. Our board of directors may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of capital stock or the number of authorized shares of capital stock of any class or series without stockholder approval. After you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, our board of directors may elect, without stockholder approval, to: (1) sell additional shares in this or future public offerings; (2) issue additional shares of our common stock or units in our Operating Partnership in private offerings; (3) issue shares of our common stock or units in our Operating Partnership upon the exercise of the options we may grant to our independent directors or future employees; (4) issue shares of our common stock or units in our Operating Partnership to sellers of properties we acquire, or (5) issue equity incentive compensation to certain employees of affiliated service providers or to third parties as satisfaction of obligations under incentive compensation arrangements. In addition, we may be obligated to issue shares of our common stock or units in our Operating Partnership to our Adviser or the Special Limited Partner, or their successors or assigns, in payment of an outstanding obligation to pay fees for services rendered to us or the performance participation allocation. To the extent we issue additional shares of common stock after your purchase in this offering, your percentage ownership interest in us will be diluted. Because we will hold all of our assets through the Operating Partnership, to the extent we issue additional units of our Operating Partnership after your purchase in this offering, your percentage ownership interest in our assets will be diluted. Because certain classes of the units of our Operating Partnership may, in the discretion of our board of directors, be exchanged for shares of our common stock, any issuance of units in our Operating Partnership could result in the issuance of a corresponding number of shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders. Because of these and other reasons, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution in their percentage ownership of our shares or their interests in the underlying assets held by our Operating Partnership. Operating Partnership units may have different and preferential rights to the claims of common units of our Operating Partnership which correspond to the common stock held by our stockholders. Certain units in our Operating Partnership may have different and preferential rights to the terms of the common Operating Partnership units which correspond to the common stock held by our stockholders.

The net tangible book value of your shares will be substantially below the price you pay for them. As a result, on acquiring shares, you will experience immediate dilution in the net tangible book value of your shares, thus increasing the risk of a loss on your investment.

Net tangible book value per share is a rough approximation of value. It assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time as shown through the depreciation and amortization of real estate investments. Real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. Net tangible book value is used generally as a conservative measure of net worth that we do not believe will reflect our net asset value per share. It is not intended to reflect the value of our assets upon an orderly liquidation of the company in accordance with our investment objectives. As of December 31, 2025, the net tangible book value per share of our common stock was $9.01. The net tangible book value per share of our common stock as of December 31, 2025 is calculated by dividing our net tangible book value as of that date, which represents total assets less total liabilities and the liquidation preference of any outstanding preferred stock, by the sum of (i) the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding and (ii) the total number of Operating Partnership units held by persons other than us as of December 31, 2025.

We have incurred substantial organization and offering expenses. Although our Adviser has agreed to pay these costs on our behalf through March 19, 2027, we must reimburse our Adviser for them over a five-year period, subject to a cap. Although the net asset value of our shares will only be affected by this liability as it is paid, the net tangible book value of our shares is a GAAP figure and must reflect the full amount of the liability as of March 19, 2024, which is the date on which we broke escrow for this offering, and thereafter, as incurred. Additionally, our Adviser will advance on our behalf certain of our general and administrative expenses through the earlier of (i) the first date that the aggregate NAV of our outstanding shares of common stock, along with Operating Partnership units held by parties other than us, reaches $1.0 billion and (ii) March 19, 2027, which is the third anniversary of the date

on which we broke escrow in this offering, at which point we will reimburse our Adviser for all such advanced expenses ratably over the 60 months following such date. Although the net asset value of our shares will only be affected by this liability as it is paid, under GAAP the net tangible book value of shares must reflect this liability as of the date on which we broke escrow for this offering, and thereafter, as incurred. As a result, the net tangible book value of your shares will be less than the amount you paid for them. Moreover, purchasers of Class T, S and D shares have to pay an upfront commission for their shares, further widening the spread between your purchase price and the net tangible book value of your shares. As a result, you will experience immediate dilution in the net tangible book value of your investment.

Further, we may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fully fund distributions to stockholders. Funding distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations may further dilute the net tangible book value of your shares. See “We may pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, including, without limitation, the sale or repayment of our assets, borrowings, return of capital, offering proceeds or the temporary deferral or waiver of fees and expense reimbursements (including the payment of fees with shares of our stock), and we have no limits on the amounts we may pay from such sources.”

These factors increase the risk of loss on your investment.

Our bylaws designate the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland or, if that court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland or, if that court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, shall be the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders with respect to our Company, our directors, our officers or our employees (we note we currently have no employees). This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that the stockholder believes is favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage meritorious claims from being asserted against us and our directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our bylaws inapplicable to or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We adopted this provision because we believe it makes it less likely that we will be forced to incur the expense of defending duplicative actions in multiple forums and less likely that plaintiffs’ attorneys will be able to employ such litigation to coerce us into otherwise unjustified settlements, and we believe the risk of a court declining to enforce this provision is remote, as the General Assembly of Maryland has specifically amended the MGCL to authorize the adoption of such provisions. This provision of our bylaws does not apply to claims brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction or to claims under state securities laws.

We will not be required to comply with certain reporting requirements, including those relating to auditor’s attestation reports on the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting, accounting standards and disclosure about our executive compensation, that apply to other public companies.

The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, relax certain reporting requirements for emerging growth companies, including certain requirements relating to accounting standards and compensation disclosure. We are classified as an emerging growth company. For as long as we are an emerging growth company, which may be up to five full fiscal years, unlike other public companies, we will not be required to (1) provide an auditor’s attestation report on the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (2) comply with any new or revised financial accounting standards applicable to public companies until such standards are also applicable to private companies under Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act, (3) comply with any new requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the issuer, (4) comply with any new audit rules adopted by the PCAOB after April 5, 2012 unless the SEC determines otherwise, (5) provide certain disclosure regarding executive compensation required of larger public companies or (6) hold stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation.

Once we are no longer an emerging growth company, so long as our shares of common stock are not traded on a securities exchange, we will be deemed to be a “non-accelerated filer” under the Exchange Act, and as a non-accelerated filer, we will be exempt from compliance with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, so long as we are externally managed by our Adviser and we do not directly compensate our executive officers, or reimburse our Adviser or its affiliates for salaries, bonuses, benefits and severance payments for persons who also serve as one of our executive officers or as an executive officer of our Adviser, we do not have any executive compensation, making the exemptions listed in (5) and (6) above generally inapplicable.

We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we choose to rely on any of the exemptions discussed above.

As noted above, under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to opt out of this transition period, and will therefore comply with new or revised accounting standards on the applicable dates on which the adoption of these standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. This election is irrevocable.

Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

We intend to conduct our operations so that neither we, nor our Operating Partnership nor the subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership are investment companies under the Investment Company Act. However, there can be no assurance that we and our subsidiaries will be able to successfully avoid operating as an investment company. See “Prospectus Summary—Are there any Investment Company Act of 1940 considerations?”

A change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect our ability to avoid registration under the Investment Company Act. To avoid registration, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may have to acquire additional assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forego opportunities to acquire assets that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy.

If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use borrowings), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act), and portfolio composition, including disclosure requirements and restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration, and other matters. Compliance with the Investment Company Act would, accordingly, limit our ability to make certain investments and require us to restructure our business plan, which could materially adversely affect our NAV and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

We depend on our Adviser to develop appropriate systems and procedures to control operational risk.

Operational risks arising from mistakes made in the confirmation or settlement of transactions, from transactions not being properly booked, evaluated or accounted for or other similar disruption in our operations may cause us to suffer financial losses, the disruption of our business, liability to third parties, regulatory intervention or damage to our reputation. We depend on our Adviser and its affiliates to develop the appropriate systems and procedures to control operational risk. We rely heavily on our financial, accounting and other data processing systems. The ability of our systems to accommodate transactions could also constrain our ability to properly manage our portfolio. Generally, our Adviser will not be liable for losses incurred due to the occurrence of any such errors.

We are subject to the risk that our trading orders may not be executed in a timely and efficient manner due to various circumstances, including, without limitation, systems failure or human error. As a result, we could be unable to achieve the market position selected by our Adviser or might incur a loss in liquidating our positions. Since some of the markets in which we may effect transactions are over-the-counter or interdealer markets, the participants in such markets are typically not subject to credit evaluation or regulatory oversight comparable to that which members of exchange-based markets are subject. We are also exposed to the risk that a counterparty will not settle a transaction in accordance with its terms and conditions, thereby causing us to suffer a loss.

We are dependent on information systems, and systems failures, as well as operating failures, could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

Our business is dependent on our and third parties’ communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities. Our financial, accounting, data processing, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control and adversely affect our business. There could be:

In addition to our dependence on information systems, poor operating performance by our service providers could adversely impact us.

These events, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and negatively affect the market price of our securities and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Compliance with the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest by selected dealers may negatively impact our ability to raise capital in this offering, which could harm our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Broker-dealers are required to comply with Regulation Best Interest, which, among other requirements, establishes a standard of conduct for broker-dealers and their associated persons when making a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer. Regulation Best Interest may negatively impact whether selected dealers and their associated persons recommend this offering to certain retail customers. In particular, under SEC guidance concerning Regulation Best Interest, a broker-dealer recommending an investment in our shares should consider a number of factors under the care obligation of Regulation Best Interest, including but not limited to cost and complexity of the investment and reasonably available alternatives in determining whether there is a reasonable basis for the recommendation. As a result, high cost, high risk and complex products may be subject to greater scrutiny by broker-dealers. Broker-dealers may recommend a more costly or complex product as long as they have a reasonable basis to believe it is in the best interest of a particular retail customer. However, if broker-dealers choose alternatives to our shares, many of which likely exist, such as an investment in listed entities, which may be a reasonable alternative to an investment in us as such investments may feature characteristics like lower cost, nominal or no commissions at the time of initial purchase, less complexity and lesser or different risks, our ability to raise capital will be adversely affected. If Regulation Best Interest reduces our ability to raise capital in this offering, it may harm our ability to achieve our objectives.

Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our business relationships. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information and operation systems, both internal and those provided by our Adviser and third-party service providers. Our Adviser may not be able to verify the risks or reliability of such third-party systems. The failure of one or more systems or the inability of such systems to satisfy our growing business could have a material adverse effect on us. The rapid evolution and increased adoption of artificial intelligence technologies, by us, our Adviser or third parties, may also heighten our cybersecurity risks by making cyberattacks more difficult to detect, contain and mitigate. Our Adviser and third-party service providers have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls to help mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber incident, do not guarantee that a cyber incident will not occur and/or that our financial results, operations or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.

We are subject to risks associated with artificial intelligence and machine learning technology.

Technological developments in artificial intelligence, including machine learning, generative artificial intelligence and similar technologies that collect, aggregate, analyze or generate data or other materials (collectively “AI”), and their current and potential future applications including in the real estate, capital and financial markets, as well as the legal and regulatory frameworks within which they operate, are rapidly evolving.

We and our Adviser intend to avail ourselves of the benefits, insights and efficiencies available through the use of AI. While the Adviser does not currently use AI to make investment recommendations, we and our Adviser currently utilize certain AI tools in a limited manner such as to support data collection, aggregation, storage, organization and summarization, and to assist with other operational, administrative, research and analytical support functions. Such uses are intended to enhance efficiency and are subject to human oversight. We expect to evaluate and selectively deploy AI to support operational and analytical functions.

We and our Adviser may also be exposed to the risks of AI if third-party service providers or any counterparties, whether or not known to us, also use AI in their business activities. We and our Adviser may not be in a position to control the use of AI technology in third-party products or services.

Use of AI could include the input of confidential information in contravention of applicable policies, contractual or other obligations or restrictions, resulting in such confidential information becoming accessible by other third-party AI applications and users. The use of AI could also exacerbate or create new and unpredictable risks to our business and the Adviser’s business, including by potentially significantly disrupting the markets in which we operate or subjecting us and our Adviser to increased competition and regulation, which could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition or results of operations of us and our Adviser. The use of AI by bad actors could heighten the sophistication and effectiveness of cybersecurity attacks experienced by us and our Adviser. Further, AI technology is generally highly reliant on the collection and analysis of large amounts of data, and it is not possible or practicable to incorporate all relevant data into the model that AI technology utilizes to operate. AI’s reliance on large data sets and complex, sometimes opaque models may yield inaccurate, incomplete or biased outputs that could diminish the quality of any work product incorporating AI and adversely affect us or our Adviser. Certain data in such models will inevitably contain a degree of inaccuracy and error. As AI technology and its applications continue to develop rapidly, it is impossible to predict the future risks that may arise from such developments to our industry or business.

We will face risks associated with hedging transactions.

We may utilize a wide variety of derivative and other hedging instruments for risk management purposes, the use of which is a highly specialized activity that may entail greater than ordinary investment risks. Any such derivatives and other hedging transactions may not be effective in mitigating risk in all market conditions or against all types of risk (including unidentified or unanticipated risks), thereby resulting in losses to us. Engaging in derivatives and other hedging transactions may result in a poorer overall performance for us than if we had not engaged in any such transaction, and our Adviser may not be able to hedge against, or anticipate, certain risks that may adversely affect our investment portfolio. In addition, our investment portfolio will always be exposed to certain risks that cannot be fully or effectively hedged, such as credit risk relating both to particular securities and counterparties as well as interest rate risks. See “General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate Related Securities—We may invest in derivatives, which involve numerous risks” below.

General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate

Our operating results will be affected by economic and regulatory changes that impact the real estate market in general.

We are subject to risks generally attributable to the ownership of real property, including:

All of these factors are beyond our control. Any negative changes in these factors could affect our performance and our ability to meet our obligations and make distributions to stockholders.

Our success is dependent on general market and economic conditions.

The real estate industry generally and the success of our investment activities in particular will both be affected by global and national economic and market conditions generally and by the local economic conditions where our properties are located. These factors may affect the level and volatility of real estate prices, which could impair our profitability or result in losses. In addition, general fluctuations in the market prices of securities, interest rates and inflation may affect our investment opportunities and the value of our investments. Our Adviser’s financial condition may be adversely affected by a significant economic downturn and it may be subject to legal, regulatory, reputational and other unforeseen risks that could have a material adverse effect on our Adviser’s businesses and operations.

A depression, recession or slowdown in the U.S. real estate market or one or more regional real estate markets, and to a lesser extent, the global economy (or any particular segment thereof) would have a pronounced impact on us, the value of our assets and our profitability, impede the ability of our assets to perform under or refinance their existing obligations, and impair our ability to effectively deploy our capital or realize upon investments on favorable terms. We would also be affected by any overall weakening of, or disruptions in, the financial markets. Any of the foregoing events could result in substantial losses to our business, which losses will likely be exacerbated by the presence of leverage in our capital structure or our investments’ capital structures.

Market disruptions in a single country could cause a worsening of conditions on a regional and even global level, and economic problems in a single country are increasingly affecting other markets and economies. A continuation of this trend could result in problems in one country adversely affecting regional and even global economic conditions and markets. For example, concerns about the fiscal stability and growth prospects of certain European countries in the last economic downturn had a negative impact on most economies of the Eurozone and global markets. The occurrence of similar crises in the future could cause increased volatility in the economies and financial markets of countries throughout a region, or even globally.

For example, as a result of the 2008 financial crisis, the availability of debt financing secured by commercial real estate was significantly restricted as a result of tightened lending standards for a prolonged period. As a result of the uncertainties in the credit market, real estate investors were unable to obtain debt financing on attractive terms, which adversely affected investment returns on acquisitions or their ability to make acquisitions or property improvements. Any future financial market disruptions may force us to use a greater proportion of our offering proceeds to finance our acquisitions and fund property improvements, reducing the cash available to pay distributions or satisfy repurchase requests and reducing the number of acquisitions we would otherwise make.

The current ongoing conflicts such as in the Middle East and other geopolitical events generally have resulted in rising geopolitical tensions. As further military conflicts and economic sanctions continue to evolve, it has become increasingly difficult to predict the impact of these events or how long they will last. Depending on direction and timing, such conflicts may exacerbate normal risks associated with the performance of our investments.

Currently, market uncertainty and volatility are heightened for a variety of reasons, including as a result of uncertainties regarding actual and potential shifts in U.S. and foreign policies on trade and other fiscal, monetary and regulatory policies, such as with respect to treaties and tariffs. The U.S. government has imposed, and may in the future impose, tariffs on certain foreign goods, including steel and aluminum, or on goods from particular countries. Some foreign governments have imposed, or may in the future impose, retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. goods. Global trade disruption, significant introductions of trade barriers and bilateral trade frictions, together with any future downturns in the global economy resulting therefrom, could adversely affect our performance.

The failure of certain financial institutions, namely banks, may increase the possibility of a sustained deterioration of financial market liquidity, or illiquidity at clearing, cash management and/or custodial financial institutions. The failure of a bank (or banks) with which we and/or our tenants have a commercial relationship could adversely affect, among other things, our or our tenant’s ability to access deposits or borrow from financial institutions on favorable terms.

Certain countries have been susceptible to epidemics and pandemics, such as the novel coronavirus, known as COVID‑19. The outbreak of such epidemics or pandemics, and the uncertainties and disruptions resulting therefrom, have had and may in the future have a negative impact on the economy and business activity globally (including in the markets in which we expect to invest), and thereby could adversely affect the performance of our future investments. Furthermore, the rapid development of epidemics or pandemics could preclude prediction as to their ultimate adverse impact on economic and market conditions, and, as a result, present material uncertainty and risk with respect to us and the performance of our investments. These epidemics or pandemics could have particularly adverse impacts on certain industries and may also have particular negative effects on certain regions in which we may invest.

Inflation may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

While the United States inflation rate has decreased from recent peaks, inflation remains elevated, and it remains uncertain whether substantial inflation in the United States will be sustained over an extended period of time or have a significant effect on the United States or other economies. Rising or sustained periods of elevated inflation could have an adverse impact on our operating costs, including any floating rate mortgages and credit facilities, property operating expenses and general and administrative expenses, as these costs could increase at a rate higher than our rental and other revenue. Inflation could also have an adverse effect on consumer spending, which could impact our tenants’ revenues and, in turn, our rents, where applicable.

In addition, leases of long-term duration or which include renewal options that specify a maximum rate increase may result in below-market lease rates over time if we do not accurately estimate inflation or market lease rates. Provisions of our leases designed to mitigate the risk of inflation and unexpected increases in market lease rates, such as periodic rental increases, may not adequately protect us from the impact of inflation or unexpected increases in market lease rates. If we are subject to below-market lease rates on a significant number of our properties pursuant to long-term leases and our operating and other expenses are increasing faster than anticipated, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and/or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to pay distributions on our common stock could be materially adversely affected.

We depend on tenants for our revenue, and therefore our revenue is dependent on the success and economic viability of our tenants. Our reliance on single or significant tenants in certain buildings may decrease our ability to lease vacated space and could adversely affect our income, performance, operations and ability to pay distributions.

Rental income from real property constitutes a significant portion of our income. Delays in collecting accounts receivable from tenants could adversely affect our cash flows and financial condition. In addition, the inability of a single major tenant or a number of smaller tenants to meet their rental obligations would adversely affect our income. Therefore, our financial success is indirectly dependent on the success of the businesses operated by the tenants in our properties. The weakening of the financial condition of or the bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant tenant or a number of smaller tenants and vacancies caused by defaults of tenants or the expiration of leases may adversely affect our operations, performance and our ability to pay distributions.

Generally, under U.S. bankruptcy law, a debtor tenant has 120 days to exercise the option of assuming or rejecting the obligations under any unexpired lease for nonresidential real property, which period may be extended once by the bankruptcy court for an additional 90 days. If the tenant assumes its lease, the tenant must cure all defaults under the lease and may be required to provide adequate assurance of its future performance under the lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, we will have a claim against the tenant’s bankruptcy estate. Although rent owing for the period between filing for bankruptcy and rejection of the lease may be afforded administrative expense priority and paid in full, pre-bankruptcy arrears and amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be afforded general unsecured claim status (absent collateral securing the claim). Moreover, amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be capped. Other than equity and subordinated claims, general unsecured claims are the last claims paid in a bankruptcy, and therefore funds may not be available to pay such claims in full.

Some of our properties may be leased to a single or significant tenant and, accordingly, may be suited to the particular or unique needs of such tenant. We may have difficulty replacing such a tenant if the floor plan of the vacant space limits the types of businesses that can use the space without major renovation. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.

Similarly, certain types of properties we may invest in, such as industrial warehouses, may be leased out to single tenants or tenants that are otherwise reliant on a single enterprise to remain in business and other properties may be operated by a single operator. Adverse impacts to such tenants, businesses or operators, including as a result of changes in market or economic conditions, natural disasters, outbreaks of an infectious disease, pandemic or any other serious public health concern, political events or other factors that may impact the operation of these properties, may have negative effects on our business and financial results. As a result, such tenants or operators may be required to suspend operations at our properties for what could be an extended period of time. Further, if such tenants default under their leases or such operators are unable to operate our properties, we may not be able to enter

into a new lease or operating arrangement for such properties promptly, rental rates or other terms under any new leases or operating arrangement may be less favorable than the terms of the current lease or operating arrangement or we may be required to make capital improvements to such properties for a new tenant or operator, any of which could adversely impact our operating results.

As of December 31, 2025, we had a concentration of credit risk with respect to our leases with Amazon.com Services LLC and Shoals Technologies Group, LLC.

As of December 31, 2025, the leases with Amazon.com Services LLC represent approximately 64% of our portfolio’s annualized base rent and the lease with Shoals Technologies Group, LLC represents approximately 16% of our portfolio’s annualized base rent. The obligations of Amazon.com Services LLC under its leases with us are guaranteed by its parent, Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”). The obligations of Shoals Technologies Group, LLC under its lease with us are guaranteed by its parent, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (“Shoals”). Due to this concentration of credit risk, sufficiently adverse developments with respect to Amazon’s or Shoals’ business such that their respective subsidiaries could not honor their lease obligations or such that Amazon or Shoals could not honor their respective guarantees would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and the value of your investment in us could decline substantially.

Our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of industries, geographies or investments.

Our portfolio may be heavily concentrated at any time in only a limited number of industries, geographies or investments, and, as a consequence, our aggregate return may be substantially affected by the unfavorable performance of even a single investment. Concentration of our investments in a particular type of asset or geography makes us more susceptible to fluctuations in value resulting from adverse economic or business conditions affecting that particular type of asset or geography. Investors have no assurance as to the degree of diversification in our investments, either by geographic region or asset type.

We face risks associated with property acquisitions.

We intend to acquire properties and portfolios of properties, including large portfolios that could result in changes to our capital structure. Our acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:

In addition, while we will invest primarily in stabilized, income-oriented real estate, we may also acquire assets that require some amount of capital investment in order to be renovated or repositioned. These investments are generally subject to higher risk of loss than investments in stabilized real estate, and there is no guarantee that any renovation or repositioning will be successful or that the actual costs will not be greater than our estimates.

Competition for investment opportunities may reduce our profitability and the return on your investment.

We face competition from various entities for investment opportunities in properties, including other REITs, real estate operating companies, pension funds, insurance companies, investment funds and companies, partnerships and developers. In addition to third-party competitors, other programs sponsored by our Adviser and its affiliates, particularly those with investment strategies that overlap with ours, may seek investment opportunities in accordance with our Adviser’s policies and procedures. Some of these entities, including other REITs, have greater access to capital to acquire properties than we have. Competition from these entities may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us, increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell or cause us to pay more for an investment than we otherwise would. Additionally, disruptions and dislocations in the credit markets could have a material impact on the cost and availability of debt to finance real estate acquisitions, which is a key component of our acquisition strategy. The lack of available debt on reasonable terms or at all could result in a further reduction of suitable investment opportunities and create a competitive advantage for other entities that have greater financial resources than we do. In addition, over the past several years, a number of real estate funds and publicly traded and non-traded REITs have been formed and others have been

consolidated (and many such existing funds have grown in size) for the purpose of investing in real estate and/or real estate related securities. Additional real estate funds, vehicles and REITs with similar investment objectives are expected to be formed in the future by other unrelated parties and further consolidations may occur (resulting in larger funds and vehicles). Consequently, it is expected that competition for appropriate investment opportunities would reduce the number of investment opportunities available to us and adversely affect the terms, including price, upon which investments can be made. This competition may cause us to acquire properties and other investments at higher prices or by using less-than-ideal capital structures, and in such case our returns will be lower and the value of our assets may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such assets. If such events occur, you may experience a lower return on your investment.

Acquiring or attempting to acquire multiple properties in a single transaction may adversely affect our operations.

We may acquire multiple properties in a single transaction. Portfolio acquisitions typically are more complex and expensive than single-property acquisitions, and the risk that a multiple-property acquisition does not close may be greater than in a single-property acquisition. Portfolio acquisitions may also result in us owning investments in geographically dispersed markets, placing additional demands on our Adviser in managing the properties in the portfolio. In addition, a seller may require that a group of properties be purchased as a package and/or also include certain additional investments or transactions even though, were it not part of the overall transaction, we may not want to purchase one or more properties included in such portfolio or participate in additional investments or transactions. In these situations, if we are unable to identify another person or entity to acquire the unwanted properties or investments, or if the seller imposes a lock-out period or other restriction on a subsequent sale, we may be required to operate such properties or attempt to dispose of such properties or investments (if not subject to a lock-out period). We may also share the acquisition of large portfolios of properties with our affiliates, which can result in conflicts of interest, including as to the allocation of properties within the portfolio and the prices attributable to such properties. It may also be difficult for our Adviser to analyze each property thoroughly in a large portfolio, increasing the risk that properties do not perform as anticipated. Therefore, acquiring multiple properties in a single transaction may reduce the overall yield on our portfolio.

We may incur “dead deal costs” in connection with potential acquisitions.

We may incur costs in connection with potential acquisitions that ultimately are not acquired. For example, we may enter into contracts with non-refundable deposits to acquire certain properties. The amount deposited, if any, may be surrendered if the property is not purchased and may or may not be credited against the purchase price if the property is purchased. Additionally, we may incur due diligence and other costs when considering whether to acquire an asset, and such costs will not be reduced if the transaction fails to close. Any unreturned deposits, due diligence costs and other “dead deal costs” will reduce the amount of cash available for further investments or distributions to our stockholders.

In our due diligence review of potential investments, we will rely on third-party consultants and advisors and representations made by sellers of potential properties, and we may not identify all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating potential investments.

Before making investments, due diligence will typically be conducted in a manner that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances applicable to each investment. Due diligence may entail evaluation of important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, sustainability, real property, regulatory and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisors, appraisers, accountants, investment banks and other third parties will be involved in the due diligence process to varying degrees depending on the type of investment, the costs of which will be borne by us. Such involvement of third-party advisors or consultants may present a number of risks primarily relating to our Adviser’s reduced control of the functions that are outsourced. In the due diligence process and making an assessment regarding a potential investment, our Adviser will rely on the resources available to it, including information provided by the seller of the investment and, in some circumstances, third-party investigations. The due diligence investigation carried out with respect to any investment opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such investment opportunity, particularly for large portfolio investments. Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in the investment being successful. There can be no assurance that attempts to provide downside protection with respect to investments, including pursuant to risk-management procedures described in this prospectus, will achieve their desired effect, and potential investors should regard an investment in us as being speculative and having a high degree of risk.

There can be no assurance that our Adviser will be able to detect or prevent irregular accounting, employee misconduct or other fraudulent practices or material misstatements or omissions during the due diligence phase or during our efforts to monitor and disclose information about any investment on an ongoing basis or that any risk management procedures implemented by us will be adequate.

When conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an investment, our Adviser will rely on the resources available to it, including information provided or reported by the seller of the investment and, in some circumstances, third-party investigations. The due diligence investigation that our Adviser carries out with respect to any investment opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such investment opportunity. Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in the investment being successful. Conduct occurring at the property, even activities that occurred prior to our investment therein, could have an adverse impact on us.

In the event of fraud by the seller of any property, we may suffer a partial or total loss of capital invested in that property. An additional concern is the possibility of material misrepresentation or omission on the part of the seller. Such inaccuracy or incompleteness may adversely affect the value of our investments in such property. We will rely upon the accuracy and completeness of representations made by sellers of properties in the due diligence process to the extent reasonable when we make our investments, but cannot guarantee such accuracy or completeness.

In addition, we will rely on information, including financial information and non-GAAP metrics, provided by sellers of our investments for disclosure to our investors about potential acquisitions or current assets owned by us. Accordingly, although we may believe such information to be accurate, such information cannot be independently verified by our Adviser, and in some cases such information may not be independently reviewed or audited while under our ownership or control or at all. We cannot assure you that the financial statements or metrics of properties we will acquire would not be materially different if such statements or metrics had been independently audited or reviewed.

Certain properties may require an expedited transaction, which may result in limited information being available about the property prior to its acquisition.

Investment analyses and decisions by our Adviser may be required to be undertaken on an expedited basis to take advantage of investment opportunities. In such cases, the information available to our Adviser at the time of making an investment decision may be limited, and our Adviser may not have access to detailed information regarding the investment property or portfolio of properties, such as physical characteristics, environmental matters, zoning regulations or other local conditions affecting such investment. Therefore, no assurance can be given that our Adviser will have knowledge of all circumstances that may adversely affect an investment, and we may make investments which we would not have made if more extensive due diligence had been undertaken. Because large portfolios of properties still generally require diligence to analyze individual properties, these risks are exacerbated in expedited transactions of large portfolios. In addition, our Adviser may use consultants, legal advisors, appraisers, accountants, investment banks and other third parties in connection with its evaluation and/or diligence of certain investments. No assurance can be given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by such third parties.

We will face risks in effecting operating improvements.

In some cases, the success of an investment will depend, in part, on our ability to restructure and effect improvements in the operations of a property. The activity of identifying and implementing restructuring programs and operating improvements at properties entails a high degree of uncertainty. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully identify and implement such restructuring programs and improvements.

We may have difficulty selling our properties, which may limit our flexibility and ability to pay distributions.

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, it could be difficult for us to sell one or more of our properties promptly on favorable terms. Additionally, we may agree to lock-out or other provisions when we acquire a property that materially restrict us from selling such property or our interest in such property for a period of time. This may limit our ability to change our portfolio quickly in response to adverse changes in the performance of any such property or economic or market trends. In addition, U.S. federal tax laws that impose a 100% excise tax on gains from sales of dealer property by a REIT (generally, property held for sale, rather than investment) could limit our ability to sell properties and may affect our ability to sell properties without adversely affecting returns to our stockholders. These restrictions could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Investments in real properties carry certain litigation risks at the property level that may reduce our profitability and the return on your investment.

The acquisition, ownership and disposition of real properties carry certain specific litigation risks. Litigation may be commenced with respect to a property acquired by us in relation to activities that took place prior to our acquisition of such property. In addition, at the time of disposition of an individual property, a potential buyer may claim that it should have been afforded the opportunity to purchase the asset or alternatively that such potential buyer should be awarded due diligence expenses incurred or statutory damages for misrepresentation relating to disclosure made, if such buyer is passed over in favor of another as part of our efforts to maximize sale proceeds. Similarly, successful buyers may later sue us under various damages theories, including tort claims, for losses associated with latent defects or other problems not uncovered in due diligence.

We may make a substantial amount of joint venture investments, including with affiliates of our Adviser. Joint venture investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on the financial condition of our joint venture partners and disputes between us and our joint venture partners.

We may make joint venture investments with third parties and, subject to the requirements in our charter, co-invest in the future with affiliates of our Adviser or third parties in partnerships or other entities that own real properties. We may enter into joint ventures as part of an acquisition with the seller of the properties. We may acquire non-controlling interests or shared control interests in joint ventures. Even if we have some control in a joint venture, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the joint venture. Investments in joint ventures may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present were another party not involved, including the possibility that joint venture partners might become bankrupt or fail to fund their required capital contributions. Joint venture partners may have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives. Such investments may also have the potential risk of impasses on decisions, such as a sale, because neither we nor the joint venture partner would have full control over the joint venture. Disputes between us and joint venture partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. Consequently, actions by or disputes with joint venture partners might result in subjecting properties owned by the joint venture to additional risk. In some cases, our joint venture partner may be entitled to property management fees, promote or other incentive fee payments as part of the arrangement of the joint venture. In addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our joint venture partners.

In addition, in connection with any investments in which we participate alongside any Other EQT Real Estate Accounts, our Adviser may decline to exercise, or delegate to a third party, certain control, foreclosure and similar governance rights relating to such shared investments for legal, tax, regulatory or other reasons. There is no guarantee that we will be able to co-invest with any Other EQT Real Estate Account. We will not participate in joint ventures in which we do not have or share control to the extent that we believe such participation would potentially threaten our status as a non-investment company exempt from the Investment Company Act. This may prevent us from receiving an allocation with respect to certain investment opportunities that are suitable for both us and one or more Other EQT Real Estate Accounts.

If we have a right of first refusal to buy out a joint venture partner, we may be unable to finance such a buy-out if it becomes exercisable or we are required to purchase such interest at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. If our interest is subject to a buy/sell right, we may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to elect to purchase an interest of a joint venture partner subject to the buy/sell right, in which case we may be forced to sell our interest as the result of the exercise of such right when we would otherwise prefer to keep our interest. In some joint ventures we may be obligated to buy all or a portion of our joint venture partner’s interest in connection with a crystallization event, and we may be unable to finance such a buy-out when such crystallization event occurs, which may result in interest or other penalties accruing on the purchase price. If we buy our joint venture partner’s interest we will have increased exposure in the underlying investment. The price we use to buy our joint venture partner’s interest or sell our interest will typically be determined by negotiations between us and our joint venture partner, and there is no assurance that such price will be representative of the value of the underlying property or equal to our then-current valuation of our interest in the joint venture that is used to calculate our NAV. Finally, we may not be able to sell our interest in a joint venture if we desire to exit the venture for any reason, or if our interest is subject to a right of first refusal of our joint venture partner, our ability to sell such interest may be adversely impacted by such right. Joint ownership arrangements with affiliates of our Adviser may also entail further conflicts of interest. Joint venture partners may receive ongoing fees in connection with providing service to the joint venture or its properties, including promote payments, beyond their equity investment, which would reduce the amount of our economic interest.

Some additional risks and conflicts related to our joint venture investments (including joint venture investments with affiliates of our Adviser) include:

Furthermore, we may have conflicting fiduciary obligations if we acquire properties with our affiliates or other related entities; as a result, in any such transaction we may not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

We may be subject to expenses and liabilities related to employees of certain portfolio companies owned by us.

We may acquire portfolio companies with employees and thereby become subject to expenses and liabilities related to such employees. These expenses and liabilities could include compensation, overhead and other administrative costs, as well as potential liabilities that are commonly faced by employers, such as workers’ disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes and other employee-related liabilities and grievances. We may also be subject to other operational risks from such employees, including cybersecurity risks or as a result of employee error or malfeasance. In addition, we may encounter unforeseen costs and expenses associated with acquiring such portfolio companies and such expenses may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

If we rely on any third-party management companies to operate any of our properties or third-party leasing agents to lease vacancies in any of our properties, we may be exposed to greater risks.

Although we currently expect that affiliates of our Adviser will provide property management and leasing services for the properties we acquire, it is possible that from time to time we may engage third-party management companies to manage certain of our properties or third-party leasing agents to lease vacancies in certain properties. These management companies may be our partners in joint ventures that we enter into. These management companies will have significant decision-making authority with respect to the properties they are engaged to manage. To the extent that we engage third-party property managers, our ability and our Adviser’s ability to direct and control how our properties are managed on a day-to-day basis may be limited. Any adversity experienced by, or problems in our relationship with, any third-party management companies or third-party leasing agents we engage could adversely impact the operation and profitability of our properties.

We may be unable to renew leases as leases expire.

We may not be able to lease properties that are vacant or become vacant because a tenant decides not to renew its lease or by the continued default of a tenant under its lease. In addition, certain of the properties we acquire may have some level of vacancy at the time of acquisition. Certain other properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a tenant and may become vacant after we acquire them. Even if a tenant renews its lease or we enter into a lease with a new tenant, the terms of the new lease may be less favorable than the terms of the old lease. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value may depend principally upon the value of the property’s leases. If we are unable to renew or enter into new leases promptly, or if the rental rates are lower than expected, our results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected. For example, following the termination or expiration of a tenant’s lease there may be a period of time before we will begin receiving rental payments under a replacement lease. During that period, we will continue to bear fixed expenses such as interest, real estate taxes, maintenance, security, repairs and other operating expenses. In addition, declining economic conditions may impair our ability to attract replacement tenants and achieve rental rates equal to or greater than the rents paid under previous leases. Increased competition for tenants may require us to make capital improvements to properties that would not have otherwise been planned. Any unbudgeted capital improvements that we undertake may divert cash that would otherwise be available for distributions or for satisfying repurchase requests. Ultimately, to the extent that we are unable to renew leases or relet space as leases expire, decreased cash flow from tenants will result, which could adversely impact our operating results.

We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a tenant can be found for a property at an attractive lease rate or an investment in a property can be sold. No assurance can be given that we will have funds available to correct those defects or to make those improvements. In acquiring a property, we may agree to lock-out provisions that materially restrict us from selling that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed on that property. These factors and others that could impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties could significantly affect our financial condition and operating results.

Our properties may be leased at below-market rates under long-term leases.

We may seek to negotiate longer-term leases to reduce the cash flow volatility associated with lease rollovers, provided that contractual rent increases are generally included. In addition, where appropriate, we will seek leases that provide for operating expenses, or expense increases, to be paid by the tenants. These leases may allow tenants to renew the lease with pre-defined rate increases. If we do not accurately judge the potential for increases in market rental rates (including, for example, as a result of increased inflation), or if our negotiated increases provide for a discount to then-current market rental rates (in exchange for lower volatility), we may set the rental rates of these long-term leases at levels such that even after contractual rental increases, the resulting rental rates are less than then-current market rental rates. Further, we may be unable to terminate those leases or adjust the rent to then-prevailing market rates. As a result, our income and distributions to our stockholders could be lower than if we did not enter into long-term leases.

Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rent and could adversely impact our ability to make cash distributions to you.

To the extent we invest in any properties with short-term leases, such as multifamily residential properties, we may suffer losses if market rents decline. Thus, our ability to make distributions to you may be less certain than if we were to buy real estate with longer lease terms.

Certain of our real estate investments may not include title to the underlying land, exposing us to greater risks.

We have invested in an industrial property that is subject to a ground lease, and we may from time to time in the future invest in real properties without acquiring title to the underlying land. This means that while we would have a right to use the property, we would not hold fee title to the underlying land. Accordingly, we would have no economic interest in the land or, in many instances the improvements located on the land, at the expiration of the ground lease, easement or permit. As the remaining term of a ground lease gets shorter, the prospect of expiration of the ground lease can result in a discount in its value and difficulty in subleasing the property. In addition, a default by us under the ground lease or easement could cause a termination of the ground lease or easement, which may adversely impact our investment performance. Finally, there are complexities associated with financing a ground leasehold or easement interest.

Our properties may face significant competition.

We may face significant competition from owners, operators and developers of properties. Many of our properties will face competition from similar properties in the same market. This competition may affect our ability to attract and retain tenants and may reduce the rents we are able to charge. These competing properties may have vacancy rates higher than our properties, which may result in their owners being willing to lease available space at lower prices than the space in our properties.

We may experience material losses or damage related to our properties and such losses may not be covered by insurance.

We may experience material losses related to our properties arising from natural disasters, such as extreme weather events, climate change, earthquakes or floods, and acts of God, vandalism or other crime, faulty construction or accidents, fire, outbreaks of an infectious disease, pandemic or any other serious public health concern, war, acts of terrorism or other catastrophes. We plan to carry insurance covering our properties under policies our Adviser deems appropriate. Our Adviser will select policy specifications and insured limits that it believes to be appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice. Insurance policies on our properties may include some coverage for losses that are generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to terrorism, earthquakes and floods, but we cannot assure you that it will be adequate to cover all losses and some of our policies will be insured subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be sufficient to cover losses. In general, losses related to terrorism are becoming harder and more expensive to insure against. In some cases, the insurers exclude terrorism, in others the coverage against terrorist acts is limited, or available only for a significant price. A similar dynamic has been unfolding with respect to certain weather and fire events, with insurers excluding certain investments that have high risk of weather, earthquake or fire events. If the climate continues to warm, we expect the frequency and impact of weather-related events and conditions will increase as well. As a result, not all investments may be insured against terrorism, weather or fire. If we or one or more of our tenants experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged. Certain of these events, such as war or an outbreak of an infectious disease, could have a broader negative impact on the global or local economy, thereby affecting us or our Adviser.

We could become subject to liability for environmental violations, regardless of whether we caused such violations.

We could become subject to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance with environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid hazardous materials, the remediation of contaminated property associated with the disposal of solid and hazardous materials and other health and safety-related concerns. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or managers for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties, regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or former owner or manager of real property may be liable for the cost to remove or remediate hazardous or toxic substances, wastes or petroleum products on, under, from or in such property. These costs could be substantial and liability under these laws may attach whether or not the owner or manager knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such contamination. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each liable party may be held entirely responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred.

In addition, third parties may sue the owner or manager of a property for damages based on personal injury, natural resources, property damage or for other costs, including investigation and clean-up costs, resulting from the environmental contamination. The presence of contamination on one of our properties, or the failure to properly remediate a contaminated property, could give rise to a lien in favor of the government for costs it may incur to address the contamination, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or borrow using the property as collateral. In addition, if contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which the property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or prevent us from entering into leases with prospective tenants. There can be no assurance that future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability, or that the environmental condition of our properties will not be affected by the operations of the tenants, by the existing condition of the land and/or by operations in the vicinity of the properties. There can be no assurance that these laws, or changes in these laws, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. We could also suffer losses if reserves or insurance proceeds prove inadequate to cover any such matters. The cost to perform any remediation, and the cost to defend against any related claims, could exceed the value of the relevant investment, and in such cases we could be forced to satisfy the claims from other assets and investments. We may have an indemnity from a third party purporting to cover these liabilities, but there can be no assurance as to the financial viability of any indemnifying party at the time a claim arises. We may also provide such an indemnity to a purchaser of a property, which could adversely affect the profitability of any such disposition. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on a contaminated asset in favor of governments or government agencies for costs they may incur in connection with the contamination.

We may be exposed to the risks of investing in industrial properties.

Although owners of industrial properties are not generally required to expend substantial amounts for general capital improvements, tenant improvements or reletting costs, various other factors may affect the returns from this type of property in addition to the risks generally applicable to real estate, including, among other things, the design and adaptability of the property and the degree to which it is generally functional for industrial purposes, the proximity to highways and other means for the transportation of goods, the number and diversity of tenants among businesses or industries and the cost of converting a previously adapted space to general use. An industrial property may be more likely to have one or only a few tenants, which increases the risk that a decline in their operations or their particular business or industry segments may adversely affect the returns from the property. Additionally, a property designed for a particular use or function may be difficult to relet to another tenant or may become functionally obsolete compared to other properties. Particular uses of industrial properties may increase their risk of environmental problems. In addition, because of unique construction requirements of many industrial properties, many vacant industrial property spaces may not be easily converted to other uses. Thus, if the operations of any industrial property become unprofitable, the liquidation value of that industrial property may be substantially less than would be the case if the industrial property were readily adaptable to other uses.

Certain of our industrial property investments may be special use and/or build-to-suit and may be difficult to sell or relet upon tenant defaults or lease terminations.

Certain of our industrial property investments may include special use and/or build-to-suit properties. These types of properties are relatively illiquid compared to other types of real estate and financial assets, and this illiquidity will limit our ability to change our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. With such properties, if the current lease is terminated or not renewed, we may be required to renovate the property or to make rent concessions in order to lease the property to another tenant, finance the property or sell the property. In addition, in the event we are forced to sell the property, we may have difficulty selling it to a party other than the tenant or borrower due to the special purpose for which the property may have been designed. These and other limitations may affect our ability to sell or relet our industrial properties and adversely affect our results of operations at such properties.

Industrial tenants may be adversely affected by a decline in manufacturing activity in the United States.

Fluctuations in manufacturing activity in the United States may adversely affect industrial tenants and therefore the demand for and profitability of any industrial properties we acquire. Trade agreements with foreign countries have given employers the option to utilize less expensive foreign manufacturing workers. Outsourcing manufacturing activities could reduce the demand for U.S. workers, thereby reducing the profitability of industrial tenants and the demand for and profitability of any industrial properties we acquire.

Investments in industrial properties may be more dependent on economic activity and trade regulation than other real estate sectors.

We have invested and expect to continue to invest in industrial properties. The demand for industrial space in the U.S. is more strongly dependent on economic activity and trade regulation than other real estate sectors. For example, customers of industrial properties operate in industries including e-commerce, traditional retail, third-party logistics, warehousing and manufacturing, all of which may be adversely impacted by recently enacted and proposed changes to U.S. foreign trade policies, including tariffs and other impositions on imported goods, trade sanctions imposed on certain countries, the limitation on the importation of certain types of goods or of goods containing certain materials from other countries and other policies. Our performance may be more dependent on economic activity and trade regulation than that of real estate companies that do not invest in industrial properties.

Data center investments are subject to risks from changes in demand, technology and tenant preferences and competition in the data center industry.

We may invest in data centers. Data center investments are subject to operating risks common to the data center industry, which include changes in tenant demands or preferences, a decline or innovation in the technology industry, such as a decrease in the use of mobile or web-based commerce or the development of artificial intelligence models that utilize significantly less computing power to operate, industry slowdowns, business layoffs or downsizing, relocation of businesses, increased costs of complying with existing or new government regulations and other factors; a downturn in the market for data center space generally such as oversupply of or reduced demand for space; increased competition, including from tenants choosing to develop their own data centers; and the rapid development of new technologies or the adoption of new industry standards that render tenants’ current products and services or facilities obsolete or unmarketable. To the extent that any of these or other adverse conditions occur, they are likely to impact market rents for, and cash flows from, data center investments we make, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Data center demand is highly concentrated in a small number of large counterparties. Such concentration makes the value of data centers particularly susceptible to the risk of financial distress, consolidation or change in capital and expenditure trends of a single or small number of tenants. Data centers require significant upfront and ongoing capital expenditure for land, power, construction and equipment, as well as access to reliable power sources, which may be constrained in key markets. An increase in the price of such inputs can increase build and operating costs and reduce the profitability of such investments. The inability to access sufficient power could constrain our ability to deliver the levels of power required by tenants, each of which could negatively impact the value of our investments. A prolonged period of high interest rates could also negatively impact the valuation of such assets to the extent the contractual rent escalators in data center leases are insufficient to offset increased costs. In addition, advancements in computing and AI technologies, including efficiency improvements, without related increases in the adoption and development of such technologies, as well as technological changes that render existing data center designs less competitive or require significant redevelopment, could negatively impact demand for, and the valuation of, data center investments we make. The data center sector is also highly competitive, with pressure from various data center operators and hyperscalers building their own facilities. In addition, they have recently faced and continue to face increasing opposition from local communities and organizations. These factors may make it more difficult to deploy capital and invest in this sector.

To the extent we invest in data centers, any future decrease in the demand for data center assets or other technology- and connectivity-related real estate may have a significant adverse effect on us, which may be more materially adverse than if such assets had a more diversified tenant base or less specialized use.

We intend to invest in data center assets. To the extent we invest in data centers, any future decrease in the demand for data center assets may have a significant adverse effect on us, which may be more materially adverse than if such assets had a more diversified tenant base or less specialized use. It is possible that changes in industry practice or in technology, such as virtualization technology, more efficient or miniaturization of computing or networking devices, or devices that require higher power densities than today’s devices, may reduce demand for physical data center space and infrastructure or render data center properties obsolete or in need of significant upgrades to remain viable. In addition, the development of new technologies, the adoption of new industry standards or other factors may render the products and services of data center tenants obsolete or unmarketable and contribute to a downturn in their businesses, thereby increasing the likelihood of defaults under data center leases, which could have an adverse effect on our return on our investments. There can be no assurance that the costs of adapting to changes in industry practice or in technology will not have a material adverse effect on our investments.

Our customers may be liable for the material that content providers distribute over their network.

Although we believe our liability for third-party information stored on or transmitted through the networks of such companies is limited, the liability of private network operators is affected both by changing technology and evolving legal principles. Our customers may be exposed to legal claims relating to third-party content stored or transmitted on their networks. Such claims could involve, among others, allegations of defamation, invasion of privacy, copyright infringement or aiding and abetting restricted activities such as online gambling or pornography. If a customer decides to implement additional measures to reduce their exposure to these risks, or if a customer is required to defend itself against these kinds of claims, such customer’s operating results and financial condition could be negatively affected.

Data centers we may acquire may not be suitable for re-leasing without significant expenditures or renovations.

To the extent that data centers we may acquire contain tenant improvements installed at our tenants’ expense, they may be better suited for a specific data center user or technology industry tenants and could require significant modification in order for us to re-lease vacant space to another data center user or technology industry tenants. The tenant improvements may also become outdated or obsolete as the result of technological change, the passage of time or other factors.

As a result, we may be required to invest significant amounts or offer significant discounts to tenants in order to lease or re-lease that space, either of which could adversely affect our financial and operating results.

Our ability to lease space at data centers to tenants could be constrained by our ability to obtain sufficient electrical power.

As tenants increase their power footprint in data centers over time, the corresponding reduction in available power could limit our ability to increase occupancy rates or network density within the data centers we may acquire. Furthermore, our aggregate maximum contractual obligation to provide power and cooling to our tenants may exceed the physical capacity at such data centers if tenants were to quickly increase their demand for power and cooling. If we are not able to increase the available power and/or cooling or move the tenant to another location with sufficient power and cooling to meet such demand, we could lose the tenant as well as be exposed to liability under our tenant agreements. In addition, power and cooling systems are difficult and expensive to upgrade. Accordingly, we may not be able to efficiently upgrade or change these systems to meet new demands without incurring significant costs that we may not be able to pass on to tenants. Any such material loss of tenants, liability or additional costs could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may depend on third parties to provide network connectivity to the tenants in any data centers we may acquire and any delays or disruptions in connectivity may materially adversely affect our operating results and cash flow.

We are not a telecommunications carrier. Although we anticipate that data center tenants generally will be responsible for providing their own network connectivity, we will still depend upon the presence of telecommunications carriers’ fiber networks serving any data centers we acquire in order to attract and retain tenants. We believe that the availability of carrier capacity will directly affect our ability to achieve our projected results at data centers we acquire. Any carrier may elect not to offer its services within data centers we acquire. Any carrier that has decided to provide network connectivity to data centers we acquire may not continue to do so for any period of time. Further, some carriers are experiencing business difficulties or have announced consolidations. As a result, some carriers may be forced to downsize or terminate connectivity to data centers, which could have an adverse effect on the business of our tenants and, in turn, our own operating results.

Data centers may require construction and operation of a sophisticated redundant fiber network. The construction required to connect multiple carrier facilities to data centers is complex and involves factors outside of our control, including regulatory requirements and the availability of construction resources. If the establishment of highly diverse network connectivity to any data centers we acquire does not occur, is materially delayed or is discontinued, or is subject to failure, our operating results and cash flow may be materially adversely affected. Additionally, any hardware or fiber failures on this network may result in significant loss of connectivity to any data centers we acquire. This could negatively affect our ability to attract new tenants or retain existing tenants, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to adapt to changing technologies and tenant requirements, and our data center infrastructure may become obsolete.

The technology industry is characterized by rapidly changing technology, tenant requirements and industry standards. It is possible that after we acquire data centers, new systems could be developed to deliver power to or eliminate heat in data centers or new server technology could require lower levels of critical load and heat removal, allowing data centers to be run less expensively on a different platform, which could render our data center infrastructure obsolete. Power and cooling systems are difficult and expensive to upgrade, and we may not be able to efficiently upgrade or change these systems to meet new demands without incurring significant costs that we may not be able to pass on to our tenants which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the infrastructure that connects data centers to the Internet and other external networks may become insufficient, including with respect to latency, reliability and connectivity. We may not be able to adapt to changing technologies or meet customer demands for new processes or technologies in a timely and cost-effective manner, if at all, which would adversely impact our ability to sustain and grow our business.

Further, our inability to adapt to changing tenant requirements may make data centers we may acquire obsolete or unmarketable to such customers. Tenants may operate at significant scale across numerous data center facilities and have designed cloud and computing networks with redundancies and fail-over capabilities across these facilities, which enhances the resiliency of their networks and applications. As a result, these tenants may realize cost benefits by locating their data center operations in facilities with less electrical or mechanical infrastructure redundancy. Additionally, tenants may operate their data centers using a wider range of humidity levels and at temperatures that are higher than servers customarily have operated at in the past, all of which may result in energy cost savings for these tenants. We may not be able to operate our data centers under these environmental conditions, particularly in multi-tenant facilities with other tenants who are not willing to operate under these conditions, and our data centers could be at a competitive disadvantage to facilities that satisfy such requirements. Because we may not be able to modify the redundancy levels or environmental systems of data centers cost effectively, these or other changes in tenant requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additionally, due to regulations that apply to tenants as well as industry standards, tenants may seek specific requirements from their data centers that we are unable to provide. If new or different regulations or standards are adopted or such extra requirements are demanded by tenants, we could lose some tenants or be unable to attract new tenants in certain industries, which could materially and adversely affect our operations.

We may invest in office properties, and the value of any such investment may change based on the diversification of the tenant base, location of the property and other factors.

A number of factors may affect the value of office properties, including, among other things, diversification of the tenant base, the location, appearance, amenities and other physical attributes of the properties, and competition from other office properties. Office properties generally require their owners to expend significant amounts for general capital improvements, tenant improvements and costs of reletting space. In addition, office properties that are not equipped to accommodate the needs of modern businesses may become functionally obsolete and thus non-competitive, or may require substantial capital investment to upgrade facilities in order to

be competitive. Office properties may also be adversely affected if there is an economic decline in the businesses operated by their tenants. The risks of such an adverse effect are increased if the property revenue is dependent on a single tenant or if there is a significant concentration of tenants in a particular business or industry.

We may be adversely affected by trends in the office real estate industry.

Some businesses are rapidly evolving to make employee telecommuting, flexible work schedules, open workplaces and teleconferencing increasingly common. These practices enable businesses to reduce their space requirements. A continuation of the movement towards these practices could over time erode the overall demand for office space and, in turn, place downward pressure on occupancy, rental rates and property valuations, each of which could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our stockholders. We may also be negatively impacted by competition from other short-term office or shared space leasing companies.

We may invest in medical office buildings, which may not have efficient alternative uses, so the loss of a tenant may cause us to not be able to find a replacement or cause us to spend considerable capital to adapt the property to an alternative use.

We may seek to acquire healthcare-related assets that may only be suitable for similar healthcare-related tenants. If we or our tenants terminate the leases for these properties or our tenants lose their regulatory authority to operate such properties, we may not be able to locate suitable replacement tenants to lease the properties for their specialized uses. Alternatively, we may be required to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses.

The healthcare industry is heavily regulated and new laws or regulations, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure, failure to obtain licensure or other industry developments could result in the inability of the tenants in any healthcare-related assets we acquire from being able to make rent payments to us.

The healthcare industry is heavily regulated by federal, state and local governmental bodies. Tenants in the healthcare industry generally are subject to laws and regulations covering, among other things, licensure, certification for participation in government programs and relationships with physicians and other referral sources. Changes in these laws and regulations or the tenants’ failure to comply with these laws and regulations could negatively affect the ability of these tenants to make lease payments to us. Many healthcare properties and their tenants may require a license or certificate of need (“CON”) to operate. Failure to obtain a license or CON, or loss of a required license or CON, would prevent a facility from operating in the manner intended by the tenant. These events could materially adversely affect the ability of the tenants in any healthcare-related assets we acquire to make rent payments to us. We cannot predict the impact of state CON laws or similar laws on any investments we make in medical facilities or the operations of tenants of those assets. In addition, state CON laws often materially impact the ability of competitors to enter into the marketplace of healthcare properties. The repeal of CON laws could allow competitors to freely operate in previously closed markets. This could negatively impact tenants’ abilities to make lease payments to us.

The healthcare industry currently is experiencing rapid regulatory changes and uncertainty; changes in the demand for and methods of delivering healthcare services; changes in third-party reimbursement policies; expansion of insurance providers into patient care; continuing pressure by private and governmental payors to reduce payments to providers of services; and increased scrutiny of billing, referral and other practices by governmental authorities. These factors may adversely affect the economic performance of some or all of the tenants in any healthcare-related assets we acquire and, in turn, our performance.

Any investments in life sciences properties may be subject to unique risks.

Life science properties and their tenants may be subject to a number of unique risks. The occurrence of any could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In particular, life science tenants may be subject to a number of risks unique to their industry, including (a) high levels of regulation including increasing government price controls and other healthcare cost containment measures, (b) failures in the safety and efficacy of their products, (c) significant funding requirements for product research and development, and (d) changes in technology, patent expiration, and intellectual property protection. These risks may adversely affect their ability to make rental payments to us or satisfy their other lease obligations and consequently may materially adversely affect property revenue and valuation.

In addition, improvements to life science properties are typically more costly than improvements to traditional office space or other property types. Many life science properties generally contain infrastructure improvements that are significantly more costly than improvements to other property types. Typical improvements include (a) reinforced concrete floors, (b) upgraded roof loading capacity, (c) increased floor-to-ceiling heights, (d) heavy-duty HVAC systems, (e) enhanced environmental control technology, (f) significantly upgraded electrical, gas, and plumbing infrastructure, and (g) laboratory benches.

Further, life science tenants may engage in research and development activities that involve controlled use of hazardous materials, chemicals, and biological and radioactive compounds. In the event of contamination or injury from the use of these hazardous materials, we could be held liable for damages that result. This liability could exceed our resources and any recovery available through any applicable insurance coverage, which could adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Together with our tenants, we must comply with federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling, and disposal of hazardous materials and waste products. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations, or changes thereto, could adversely affect our business or our tenants’ businesses and their ability to make rental payments to us.

We have invested and expect to continue to invest in commercial properties subject to net leases, which could subject us to losses.

We have invested and expect to continue to invest in commercial properties subject to net leases. Typically, net leases require the tenants to pay substantially all of the operating costs associated with the properties. As a result, the value of, and income from, investments in commercial properties subject to net leases will depend, in part, upon the ability of the applicable tenant to meet its obligations to maintain the property under the terms of the net lease. If a tenant fails or becomes unable to so maintain a property, we will be subject to all risks associated with owning the underlying real estate. In addition, we may have limited oversight into the operations or the managers of these properties, subject to the terms of the net leases.

We have invested and expect to continue to invest in commercial properties subject to net leases that are occupied by a single tenant. The success of such investments is largely dependent on the financial stability of each such tenant. A default of any such tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue from the property and cause us to have to find an alternative source of revenue to meet any mortgage payment and prevent a foreclosure if the property is subject to a mortgage. In the event of a default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and reletting our property. If a lease is terminated, we may also incur significant losses to make the leased premises ready for another tenant and experience difficulty or a significant delay in re-leasing such property.

In addition, net leases typically have longer lease terms, and thus there is an increased risk that contractual rental increases in future years will fail to result in fair market rental rates during those years.

We may acquire these investments through sale-leaseback transactions, which involve the purchase of a property and the leasing of such property back to the seller thereof. If we enter into a sale-leaseback transaction, we will seek to structure any such sale-leaseback transaction such that the lease will be characterized as a "true lease" for U.S. federal income tax purposes, thereby allowing us to be treated as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, we cannot assure you that the IRS will not challenge such characterization. In the event that any such sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and recharacterized as a financing transaction or loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed, and the timing of our income inclusion could differ from that of the lease payments. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so recharacterized (or otherwise not respected as a lease), we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification asset tests or gross income tests and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of recharacterization. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the REIT distribution requirement for a taxable year.

If a tenant of a net lease defaults and we are unable to find a replacement tenant, we may attempt to hold and operate the relevant property ourselves through a taxable REIT subsidiary, which would subject income on the property to corporate-level taxation and reduce our funds available for distribution. In certain circumstances, depending on how much capacity we have available of the total value we are permitted to hold in taxable REIT subsidiaries under applicable rules, we may not be able to hold and operate the property in a taxable REIT subsidiary, which could result in the property and the related income not satisfying the REIT qualification asset and gross income tests and could jeopardize our REIT status.

Our costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”) or the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988 (the “FHAA”) may affect cash available for distributions.

Any domestic properties we acquire will generally be subject to the ADA. Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The ADA’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. We may not acquire properties that comply with the ADA or we may not be able to allocate the burden on the seller or other third party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with the ADA in all cases.

The multifamily residential properties in which we may invest must comply with the FHAA, which requires that multifamily communities first occupied after March 13, 1991 be accessible to residents and visitors with disabilities. Compliance with the FHAA could require removal of access barriers to persons with disabilities, including the interiors of apartment units covered under the FHAA. Recently there has been heightened scrutiny of multifamily housing communities for compliance with the requirements of the FHAA and the ADA and an increasing number of substantial enforcement actions and private lawsuits have been brought against multifamily communities to ensure compliance with these requirements. Noncompliance with the FHAA and the ADA could result in the imposition of fines, awards of damages to private litigants, payment of attorneys’ fees and other costs to plaintiffs, substantial litigation costs and substantial costs of remediation.

Rent control and other changes in applicable laws, or noncompliance with applicable laws, could adversely affect our multifamily residential properties.

Lower revenue growth or significant unanticipated expenditures may result from changes in rent control or rent stabilization laws or other residential landlord/tenant laws. Municipalities may implement, consider or be urged by advocacy groups to consider rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations or take other actions that could limit our ability to raise rents based on market conditions. These initiatives and any other future enactments of rent control or rent stabilization laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing, as well as any lawsuits against us arising from such rent control or other laws, may reduce rental revenues or increase operating costs. Such laws and regulations may limit our ability to charge market rents, increase rents, evict tenants or recover increases in our operating costs and could make it more difficult for us to dispose of properties in certain circumstances. Expenses associated with investments in residential properties, such as debt service, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in rental income from such properties.

Increased levels of unemployment could adversely affect the occupancy and rental rates of any residential properties we acquire.

Increased levels of unemployment in residential markets could significantly decrease occupancy and rental rates. In times of increasing unemployment, residential occupancy and rental rates have historically been adversely affected by:

These factors generally have contributed to lower rental rates. To the extent that we invest in any residential properties, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make distributions to you may be adversely affected by these factors.

We may not be able to attract desirable tenants for our residential properties and may have difficulty evicting defaulting tenants.

Our success with residential rentals will depend, in large part, upon our ability to attract and retain qualified tenants for our residential properties. If we are unable to attract quality tenants our rental revenues will be adversely affected. If certain of our tenants cease paying rent, we may be unable or unwilling to evict such tenants due to legal, regulatory or practical concerns and, as a result, may be unable to enter into a new lease for the applicable unit or property, resulting in lost revenue. In addition, our efforts to evict residential tenants may result in litigation, resulting in increased expenses and potential liability for our residential properties.

The properties we acquire will be subject to property taxes that may increase in the future, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

Any properties we acquire will be subject to real and personal property taxes that may increase as property tax rates change and as the properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Some of our leases may provide that the property taxes, or increases therein, are charged to the lessees as an expense related to the properties that they occupy. As the owner of the properties, however, we are ultimately responsible for payment of the taxes to the government. If property taxes increase, our tenants may be unable (or may not be obligated) to make the required tax payments, ultimately requiring us to pay the taxes. In addition, we are generally responsible for property taxes related to any vacant space. If we purchase residential properties, the leases for such properties typically will not allow us to pass through real estate taxes and other taxes to residents of such properties. Consequently, any tax increases may adversely affect our results of operations at such properties.

We may be exposed to third party liability, which can reduce the performance of any associated investment.

The actions or omissions of any third party operator, employee, guest or resident of our properties may involve criminal or civil liability, which could result in liability to us as owners of such properties, loss of or restrictions on required licenses, fines, litigation, reputational impact and other matters that may adversely affect our performance.

Risks related to the development of properties may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

We may invest in properties on which developments or improvements are to be constructed or completed. As such, we may be subject to the risks associated with development and construction activities including the following:

In addition, our reputation and the construction quality of our real estate developments, whether operated individually or through partnerships, may be determining factors for our ability to lease space. The timely delivery of real estate projects and the quality of our developments, however, depend on certain factors beyond our full control, including the quality and timeliness of construction materials delivered to us, weather and labor conditions. If one or more problems affect our real estate developments, our reputation and future performance may be negatively affected and we may be exposed to civil liability.

Delays in the development and construction of properties may have adverse effects on portfolio diversification, results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

If we experience delays in the development of our real properties, it could adversely affect your return. When properties are acquired prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it may take several months or longer to complete construction, to rent available space, and for rent payments to commence. Therefore, we may not receive any income from these properties and our ability to pay distributions to you could suffer. If we are delayed in the completion of any such construction project, our tenants may have the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at such newly developed project. We may incur additional

risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders prior to completion of construction. Each of these factors could result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly-constructed projects. Furthermore, the price we agree to pay for a property will be based on our projections of rental income and expenses and estimates of the fair market value of the property upon completion of construction. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property.

Certain of our investments may have additional capital requirements.

Certain of our investments, including those that may be in a development phase, are expected to require additional financing to satisfy their working capital requirements or development strategies. The amount of such additional financing needed will depend upon the maturity and objectives of the particular asset, and such financings may be only available at an unfavorable rate at such time. Each round of financing (whether from us or other investors) is typically intended to provide enough capital to reach the next major milestone in an asset’s lifecycle. If the funds provided are not sufficient, additional capital may be required to be raised at a price unfavorable to the existing investors, including us. In addition, we may make additional debt and equity investments or exercise warrants, options, convertible securities or other rights that were acquired in the initial investment in such property in order to preserve our proportionate ownership when a subsequent financing is planned, or to protect our investment when such property’s performance does not meet expectations. The availability of capital is generally a function of capital market conditions that are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will be able to predict accurately the future capital requirements necessary for success or that additional funds will be available from any source. Failure to provide sufficient additional capital with respect to an investment could adversely affect our performance.

Technological or other innovations may disrupt the markets and sectors in which we operate and subject us to increased competition or negatively impact the tenants of our properties and the value of our properties.

In this period of rapid technological and commercial innovation, new businesses and approaches may be created that could affect us, tenants of our properties or our investments or alter the market practices that help frame our strategy. For example, our office properties may be affected by competition from shared office spaces (including co-working environments) and our warehouse industrial properties may be affected if supply chains evolve in a way that decreases the need for traditional warehousing. Any of these new approaches could damage our investments, significantly disrupt the market in which we operate and subject us to increased competition, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, given the pace of innovation in recent years, the impact on a particular investment may not be foreseeable at the time we make the investment. Furthermore, we could base investment decisions on views about the direction or degree of innovation that prove inaccurate and lead to losses.

We could be negatively impacted by the condition of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) and by changes in government support for multifamily housing.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are a major source of financing for multifamily real estate in the United States. We expect to utilize loan programs sponsored by these entities to finance certain multifamily investments. In September 2008, the U.S. government increased its control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and placed both companies into a government conservatorship under the Federal Housing Finance Agency. In December 2009, the U.S. Treasury increased its financial support for these conservatorships. In February 2011, the Obama administration released its blueprint for winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and for reforming the system of housing finance. Since that time, members of Congress have introduced and Congressional committees have considered a substantial number of bills that include comprehensive or incremental approaches to winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or changing their purposes, businesses or operations. A decision by the U.S. government to eliminate or downscale Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or to reduce government support for multifamily housing more generally may adversely affect interest rates, capital availability, development of multifamily communities and the value of multifamily assets and, as a result, may adversely affect our future growth and operations. Any potential reduction in loans, guarantees and credit-enhancement arrangements from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could jeopardize the effectiveness of the multifamily sector’s derivative securities market, potentially causing breaches in loan covenants, and through reduced loan availability, impact the value of multifamily assets, which could impair the value of a significant portion of multifamily communities. Specifically, the potential for a decrease in liquidity made available to the multifamily sector by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could:

General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate Related Securities

Investments in real estate debt securities are subject to risks including various credit risks and early redemption features, which may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The debt securities and other interests in which we may invest may include secured or unsecured debt at various levels of an issuer’s capital structure. The real estate debt securities in which we may invest may not be protected by financial covenants or limitations upon additional indebtedness, may be illiquid or have limited liquidity, and may not be rated by a credit rating agency. Real estate debt securities are also subject to other creditor risks, including (i) the possibility that the debt will be uncollectible on account of applicable bankruptcy or similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights, (ii) so-called lender liability claims by the issuer of the obligation and (iii) environmental liabilities that may arise with respect to collateral securing the obligations. Our investments may be subject to early redemption features, refinancing options, pre-payment options or similar provisions, which could result in the issuer repaying the principal on an obligation held by us earlier than expected, resulting in a lower return to us than anticipated, or reinvesting in a new obligation at a lower return to us.

Debt-oriented real estate investments face a number of general market-related risks that can affect the creditworthiness of issuers, and modifications to certain loan structures and market terms make it more difficult to monitor and evaluate investments.

Any deterioration of real estate fundamentals generally, and in the United States in particular, could negatively impact our performance by making it more difficult for issuers to satisfy their debt payment obligations, increasing the default risk applicable to issuers, and making it relatively more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Changes in general economic conditions will affect the creditworthiness of issuers and real estate collateral relating to our investments and may include economic and market fluctuations, casualty or condemnation losses, regulatory limitations on rents, decreases in property values, changes in the appeal of properties to tenants, changes in supply and demand for competing properties in an area (as a result, for instance, of overbuilding), fluctuations in real estate fundamentals (including average occupancy, operating income and room rates for hotel properties), the financial resources of tenants, changes in building, environmental, zoning and other laws, energy and supply shortages, various uninsured or uninsurable risks, natural disasters, political events, trade barriers, currency exchange controls, changes in government regulations (such as rent control), changes in real property tax rates and operating expenses, changes in interest rates, changes in the availability of debt financing which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable, increased mortgage defaults, increases in borrowing rates, changes in consumer spending, outbreaks of an infectious disease, epidemics/pandemics or other serious public health concerns, negative developments in the economy or political climate that depress travel activity (including restrictions on travel or quarantines imposed), environmental liabilities, contingent liabilities on disposition of assets, acts of God, terrorist attacks, war (including ongoing conflicts such as in the Middle East and other geopolitical events generally), changes in the demand for or real estate values generally and other factors that are beyond the control of our Adviser. Such changes may develop rapidly, and it may be difficult to determine the comprehensive impact of such changes on our investments, particularly for investments that may have inherently limited liquidity. These changes may also create significant volatility in the markets for our investments, which could cause rapid and large fluctuations in the values of such investments. Recent concerns about the real estate market, interest rates, inflation, energy costs, treaties and tariffs and geopolitical issues have contributed to increased volatility and uncertainty in the markets. There can be no assurance that there will be a ready market for the resale of our debt investments because such investments may not be liquid. Illiquidity may result from the absence of an established market for the investments, as well as legal or contractual restrictions on their resale by us. The value of securities of companies which service the real estate business sector may also be affected by such risks.

Our Adviser cannot predict whether economic conditions generally, and the conditions for real estate debt investing in particular, will deteriorate in the future. Declines in the performance of the U.S. and global economies or in the real estate debt markets could have a material adverse effect on our investment activities. In addition, market conditions relating to real estate debt investments have evolved since the global financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, which has resulted in a modification to certain loan structures and market terms. For example, it has become increasingly difficult for real estate debt investors in certain circumstances to receive full transparency with respect to underlying investments because transactions are often effectuated on an indirect basis through pools or conduit vehicles rather than directly with the borrower. These and other similar changes in loan structures or market terms may make it more difficult for us to monitor and evaluate investments.

The operating and financial risks of issuers and the underlying default risk across capital structures may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our securities investments will involve credit or default risk, which is the risk that an issuer or borrower will be unable to make principal and interest payments on its outstanding debt when due. The risk of default and losses on real estate debt instruments will be affected by a number of factors, including global, regional and local economic conditions, interest rates, the commercial real estate market in general, an issuer’s equity and the financial circumstances of the issuer, as well as general economic conditions. Such default risk will be heightened to the extent we make relatively junior investments in an issuer’s capital structure since such investments are structurally subordinate to more senior tranches in such issuer’s capital structure, and our overall returns would be adversely affected to the extent one or more issuers is unable to meet its debt payment obligations when due. To the extent we hold an equity or debt interest in any issuer that is unable to meet its debt payment obligations, such equity or debt interest could become subordinated to the rights of such issuer’s creditors in a bankruptcy. See “—We may invest in subordinated debt, which is subject to greater credit risk than senior debt” below. Furthermore, the financial performance of one or more issuers could deteriorate as a result of, among other things, adverse developments in their businesses, changes in the competitive environment or an economic downturn. As a result, underlying properties or issuers that we expected to be stable may operate, or expect to operate, at a loss or have significant fluctuations in ongoing operating results, may otherwise have a weak financial condition or be experiencing financial distress and subject our investments to additional risk of loss and default.

Our debt investments will face prepayment risk and interest rate fluctuations that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

During periods of declining interest rates, the issuer of a security or borrower under a loan may exercise its option to prepay principal earlier than scheduled, forcing us to reinvest the proceeds from such prepayment in lower-yielding investments, which may result in a decline in our return. Debt investments frequently have call features that allow the issuer to redeem the security at dates prior to its stated maturity at a specified price (typically greater than par) only if certain prescribed conditions are met. An issuer may choose to redeem debt if, for example, the issuer can refinance the debt at a lower cost due to declining interest rates or an improvement in the credit standing of the issuer. In addition, the market price of our investments will change in response to changes in interest rates and other factors. During periods of declining interest rates, the market price of fixed-rate debt investments generally rises. Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the market price of such investments generally declines. The magnitude of these fluctuations in the market price of debt investments is generally greater for securities with longer maturities. Increases in interest rates could negatively impact the price of debt instruments and could adversely affect the value of any debt investments we make and the NAV per share of our common stock.

Reinvestment risk could affect the price for our shares or their overall returns.

Reinvestment risk is the risk that income from our portfolio will decline if we invest the proceeds from matured, traded or called securities at market interest rates that are below our real estate debt portfolio’s then-current earnings rate. A decline in income could affect the NAV of our shares or their overall returns.

Some of our securities investments may become distressed, which securities would have a high risk of default and may be illiquid.

Although it is generally anticipated that our investments in real estate related securities will focus primarily on non-distressed real estate (based on our belief that there is a high likelihood of repayment), our investments may become distressed following our acquisition thereof. Additionally, we may invest in real estate debt instruments that we believe are available to purchase at “discounted” rates or “undervalued” prices. Purchasing real estate debt at what may appear to be “undervalued” or “discounted” levels is no guarantee that these investments will generate attractive returns to us or will not be subject to further reductions in value. There is no assurance that such investments can be acquired at favorable prices, that such investments will not default or that the market for such interests will improve. In addition, the market conditions for real estate debt investments may deteriorate further, which could have an adverse effect on the performance of our investments.

During an economic downturn or recession, securities of financially troubled or operationally troubled issuers are more likely to go into default than securities of other issuers. Securities of financially troubled issuers and operationally troubled issuers are less liquid and more volatile than securities of companies not experiencing financial difficulties. The market prices of such securities are subject to erratic and abrupt market movements and the spread between bid and asked prices may be greater than normally expected. Investment in the securities of financially troubled issuers and operationally troubled issuers involves a high degree of credit and market risk. There is no assurance that our Adviser will correctly evaluate the value of the assets collateralizing such investments or the prospects for a successful reorganization or similar action.

These financial difficulties may never be overcome and may cause issuers to become subject to bankruptcy or other similar administrative proceedings, or may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations or restructuring, which may entail, among other things, an extension of the term, a substantial reduction in the interest rate, a substantial writedown of the principal of such investment and other concessions, which could adversely affect our returns on the investment. There is a possibility that we may incur substantial or total losses on our investments and in certain circumstances, subject us to certain additional potential liabilities that may exceed the value of our original investment therein.

Under certain circumstances, a lender who has inappropriately exercised control over the management and policies of a debtor may have its claims subordinated or disallowed or may be found liable for damages suffered by parties as a result of such actions. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to our investments, we may lose our entire investment, may be required to accept cash or securities with a value less than our original investment and may be required to accept different terms, including payment over an extended period of time. In addition, under certain circumstances payments to us may be reclaimed if any such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance, preferential payment or similar transactions under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws. Furthermore, bankruptcy laws and similar laws applicable to administrative proceedings may delay our ability to realize on collateral for loan positions we held, or may adversely affect the economic terms and priority of such loans through doctrines such as equitable subordination or may result in a restructure of the debt through principles such as the “cramdown” provisions of the bankruptcy laws.

However, even if a restructuring were successfully accomplished, a risk exists that, upon maturity of such investment, replacement “takeout” financing will not be available, resulting in an inability by the issuer to repay the investment. Although unlikely, it is possible that our Adviser may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on collateral securing one or more real estate debt instruments we acquire. The foreclosure process varies jurisdiction by jurisdiction and can be lengthy and expensive. Issuers often resist foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses against the holder of a real estate loan, including, without limitation, lender liability claims and defenses, even when such assertions may have no basis in fact, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action, which often prolongs and complicates an already difficult and time-consuming process. In some states or other jurisdictions, foreclosure actions can take up to several years or more to conclude. During the foreclosure proceedings, an issuer may have the ability to file for bankruptcy, potentially staying the foreclosure action and further delaying the foreclosure process. Foreclosure litigation tends to create a negative public image of the collateral property and may result in disrupting ongoing leasing, management, development and other operations of the property. In the event we foreclose on an investment, we will be subject to the risks associated with owning and operating real estate.

We may invest in subordinated debt, which is subject to greater credit risk than senior debt.

We may from time to time invest in debt instruments, including junior tranches of CMBS, that are subordinated in an issuer’s capital structure. To the extent we invest in subordinated debt of an issuer’s capital structure, including subordinated CMBS bonds, such investments and our remedies with respect thereto, including the ability to foreclose on any collateral securing such investments, will be subject to the rights of holders of more senior tranches in an issuer’s capital structure and, to the extent applicable, contractual inter-creditor, co-lender and participation agreement provisions.

Investments in subordinated debt involve greater credit risk of default and loss than the more senior classes or tranches of debt in an issuer’s capital structure. Subordinated tranches of debt instruments (including CMBS) absorb losses from default before other more senior tranches of such instruments, which creates a risk particularly if such instruments (or securities) have been issued with little or no credit enhancement or equity. As a result, to the extent we invest in subordinate debt instruments (including CMBS), we would likely receive payments or interest distributions after, and must bear the effects of losses or defaults before, the holders of other more senior tranches of debt instruments with respect to such issuer.

Certain risks associated with CMBS may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may invest a portion of our assets in pools or tranches of CMBS, including horizontal and other risk-retention investments. The collateral underlying CMBS generally consists of commercial mortgages on real property that has a multifamily or commercial use, such as retail space, office buildings, warehouse property and hotels, and which from time to time may include assets or properties owned directly or indirectly by one or more Other EQT Real Estate Accounts. CMBS have been issued in a variety of issuances, with varying structures including senior and subordinated classes. See also the risks described below in “—The CMBS in which we may invest are subject to all of the risks of the underlying commercial mortgage loans.”

Mortgage-backed securities may also have structural characteristics that distinguish them from other securities. The interest rate payable on these types of securities may be set or effectively capped at the weighted-average net coupon of the underlying assets themselves. As a result of this cap, the return to investors in such a security would be dependent on the relevant timing and rate of delinquencies and prepayments of mortgage loans bearing a higher rate of interest. In general, early prepayments will have a greater impact on the yield to investors. Federal and state law may also affect the return to investors by capping the interest rates payable by certain mortgagors. Certain mortgage-backed securities may provide for the payment of only interest for a stated period of time. In addition, in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving the originator or the servicer of the CMBS (often the same entity or an affiliate), the assets of the issuer of such securities could be treated as never having been truly sold to the issuer and could be substantively consolidated with those of the originator, or the transfer of such assets to the issuer could be voided as a fraudulent transfer.

The credit markets, including the CMBS market, have periodically experienced decreased liquidity on the primary and secondary markets during periods of market volatility. Such market conditions could re-occur and would impact the valuations of our investments and impair our ability to sell such investments if we were required to liquidate all or a portion of our CMBS investments quickly. Additionally, certain of our securities investments, such as horizontal or other risk-retention investments in CMBS, may have certain holding period and other restrictions that limit our ability to sell such investments.

Concentrated CMBS investments may pose specific risks beyond the control of our Adviser that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Default risks with respect to CMBS investments may be further pronounced in the case of single-issuer CMBS or CMBS secured by a small or less diverse collateral pool, such as single-asset, single-borrower CMBS. At any one time, a portfolio of CMBS may be backed by commercial mortgage loans disproportionately secured by properties in only a few states, regions or foreign countries. As a result, such investments may be more susceptible to geographic risks relating to such areas, including adverse economic conditions, declining home values, adverse events affecting industries located in such areas and other factors beyond the control of our Adviser relative to investments in multi-issuer CMBS or a pool of mortgage loans having more diverse property locations.

There are certain risks associated with the insolvency of obligations backing CMBS and other investments.

The real estate loans backing CMBS and other investments may be subject to various laws enacted in the jurisdiction or state of the borrower for the protection of creditors. If an unpaid creditor files a lawsuit seeking payment, the court may invalidate all or part of the borrower’s debt as a fraudulent conveyance, subordinate such indebtedness to existing or future creditors of the borrower or recover amounts previously paid by the borrower in satisfaction of such indebtedness, based on certain tests for borrower insolvency and other facts and circumstances, which may vary by jurisdiction. There can be no assurance as to what standard a court would apply in order to determine whether the borrower was “insolvent” after giving effect to the incurrence of the indebtedness constituting the mortgage backing the CMBS and other investments, or that regardless of the method of valuation, a court would not determine that the borrower was “insolvent” after giving effect to such incurrence. In addition, in the event of the insolvency of a borrower, payments made on such mortgage loans could be subject to avoidance as a “preference” if made within a certain period of time (which may be as long as one year and one day) before insolvency.

There are certain risks associated with CMBS interest shortfalls.

Our CMBS investments may be subject to interest shortfalls due to interest collected from the underlying loans not being sufficient to pay accrued interest to all of the CMBS interest holders. Interest shortfalls to the CMBS trust will occur when the servicer does not advance full interest payments on defaulted loans. The servicer in a CMBS trust is required to advance monthly principal and interest payments due on a delinquent loan. Once a loan is delinquent for a period of time (generally 60 days), the servicer is required to obtain a new appraisal to determine the value of the property securing the loan. The servicer is only required to advance interest based on the lesser of the loan amount or 90%, generally, of the appraised value. Interest shortfalls occur when 90%, generally, of the appraised value is less than the loan amount and the servicer does not advance interest on the full loan amount. The resulting interest shortfalls impact interest payments on the most junior class in the trust first. As interest shortfalls increase, more senior classes may be impacted. Over time, senior classes may be reimbursed for accumulated shortfalls if the delinquent loans are resolved, but there is no guarantee that shortfalls will be collected. Interest shortfalls to the CMBS trust may also occur as a result of accumulated advances and expenses on defaulted loans. When a defaulted loan or foreclosed property is liquidated, the servicer will be reimbursed for accumulated advances and expenses prior to payments to CMBS bond holders. If proceeds are insufficient to reimburse the servicer or if a defaulted loan is modified and not foreclosed, the servicer is able to make a claim on interest payments that is senior to the bond holders to cover accumulated advances and expenses. If the claim is greater than interest collected on the loans, interest shortfalls could impact one or more bond classes in an CMBS trust until the servicer’s claim is satisfied.

The CMBS in which we may invest are subject to all of the risks of the underlying commercial mortgage loans.

Commercial real estate loans are generally not fully amortizing, which means that they may have a significant principal balance or balloon payment due on maturity. Full satisfaction of the balloon payment by a commercial borrower is heavily dependent on the availability of subsequent financing or a functioning sales market, as well as other factors such as the value of the property, the level of prevailing mortgage rates, the borrower’s equity in the property and the financial condition and operating history of the property and the borrower. In certain situations, and during periods of credit distress, the unavailability of real estate financing may lead to default by a commercial borrower. In addition, in the absence of any such takeout financing, the ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by an income-producing property will depend upon the successful operation of such property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Furthermore, we may not have the same access to information in connection with investments in CMBS, either when investigating a potential investment or after making an investment, as compared to investments in direct real estate.

Commercial mortgage loans are usually non-recourse in nature. Therefore, if a commercial borrower defaults on the commercial mortgage loan, then the options for financial recovery are limited in nature. To the extent the underlying default rates increase with respect to the pool or tranche of CMBS in which we invest, the performance of our investments related thereto may be adversely affected. Default rates and losses on commercial mortgage loans will be affected by a number of factors, including global, regional and local economic conditions in the area where the mortgage properties are located, the borrower’s equity in the mortgage property, the financial circumstances of the borrower, tenant mix and tenant bankruptcies, property management decisions, including with respect to capital improvements, property location and condition, competition from other properties offering the same or similar services, environmental conditions, real estate tax rates, operating expenses, governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, acts of God, terrorism, social unrest and civil disturbances. A continued decline in specific commercial real estate markets and property valuations may result in higher delinquencies and defaults and potentially foreclosures. In the event of default, the lender will have no right, other than customary recourse carveouts, to assets beyond collateral attached to the commercial mortgage loan.

Our CMBS investments face risks associated with extensions that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our CMBS and other investments may be subject to extension, resulting in the term of the securities being longer than expected, which could adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition. Extensions are affected by a number of factors, including the general availability of financing in the market, the value of the related mortgaged property, the borrower’s equity in the mortgaged property, the financial circumstances of the borrower, fluctuations in the business operated by the borrower on the mortgaged property, competition, general economic conditions and other factors. Such extensions may also be made without our Adviser’s consent.

We may depend on the servicers of commercial real estate loans underlying CMBS and other investments.

The exercise of remedies and successful realization of liquidation proceeds relating to commercial real estate loans underlying CMBS and other investments may be highly dependent on the performance of the servicer or special servicer. The servicer may not be appropriately staffed or compensated to address issues or concerns with the underlying loans promptly. Such servicers may exit the business and need to be replaced, which could have a negative impact on the portfolio due to lack of focus during a transition. Special servicers frequently are affiliated with investors who have purchased the most subordinate bond classes, and certain servicing actions, such as a loan extension instead of forcing a borrower pay off, may benefit the subordinate bond classes more so than the senior bonds. Although servicers are obligated to service the portfolio subject to a servicing standard and maximize the present value of the loans for all bond classes, servicers with an affiliate investment in the CMBS or other investments may have a conflict of interest. There may be a limited number of special servicers available, particularly those which do not have conflicts of interest. In addition, to the extent any such servicers fail to perform their obligations pursuant to the applicable servicing agreements, such failure may adversely affect our investments.

We may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on certain of the CMBS we acquire, and the foreclosure process may be lengthy and expensive.

We may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on certain of the CMBS we acquire, and the foreclosure process may be lengthy and expensive. The protection of the terms of the applicable loan, including the validity or enforceability of the loan and the maintenance of the anticipated priority and perfection of the applicable security interests, may not be adequate. Furthermore, claims may be asserted by lenders or borrowers that might interfere with enforcement of our rights. Borrowers may resist foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses against us, including, without limitation, lender liability claims and defenses, even when the assertions may have no basis in fact, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action and seek to force the lender into a modification of the loan or a favorable buy-out of the borrower’s position in the loan. In some states, foreclosure actions can

take several years or more to litigate. At any time prior to or during the foreclosure proceedings, the borrower may file for bankruptcy or its equivalent, which would have the effect of staying the foreclosure actions and further delaying the foreclosure process and potentially result in a reduction or discharge of a borrower’s debt. Foreclosure may create a negative public perception of the related property, resulting in a diminution of its value, and in the event of any such foreclosure or other similar proceeding, we would also become the subject to the various risks associated with direct ownership of real estate, including environmental liabilities. Even if we are successful in foreclosing on a loan, the liquidation proceeds upon sale of the underlying real estate may not be sufficient to recover our cost basis in the loan, resulting in a loss to us. Furthermore, any costs or delays involved in the foreclosure of the loan or a liquidation of the underlying property will further reduce the net proceeds and, thus, increase the loss.

Our investments in RMBS, which may include government mortgage pass-through securities and non-agency RMBS, will be subject to default and other risks, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our investments in RMBS are subject to the risks of defaults, foreclosure timeline extension, fraud, home price depreciation and unfavorable modification of loan principal amount, interest rate and amortization of principal accompanying the underlying residential mortgage loans. To the extent that assets underlying our investments are concentrated geographically, by property type or in certain other respects, we may be subject to certain of the foregoing risks to a greater extent. In the event of defaults on the residential mortgage loans that underlie our investments in RMBS and the exhaustion of any underlying or any additional credit support, we may not realize our anticipated return on our investments and we may incur a loss on these investments. We may also acquire non-agency RMBS, which are backed by residential property but, in contrast to agency RMBS, their principal and interest are not guaranteed by federally chartered entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In addition, we may invest in government mortgage pass-through securities, which represent participation interests in pools of residential mortgage loans purchased from individual lenders by a federal agency or originated by private lenders and guaranteed by a federal agency, including those issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac certificates are not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, but the issuing agency or instrumentality has the right to borrow to meet its obligations from an existing line of credit with the U.S. Treasury. The U.S. Treasury has no legal obligation to provide such line of credit and may choose not to do so.

We will face risks related to our investments in collateralized debt obligations.

We may also invest from time to time in collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”). CDOs include, among other things, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and other similarly structured securities. A CLO is a trust typically collateralized by a pool of loans, which may include, among others, domestic and foreign senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans. For CLOs, the cash flows from the trust are split into two or more portions, called tranches. CLO tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, increased sensitivity to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults and aversion to CLO securities as a class. The risks of an investment in a CDO depend largely on the type of the collateral and the class of the CDO in which we invest.

Normally, CLOs and other CDOs are privately offered and sold, and thus are not registered under the securities laws. As a result, certain investments in CDOs may be characterized as illiquid securities, and volatility in CLO and CDO trading markets may cause the value of these investments to decline. Moreover, if the underlying mortgage portfolio has been overvalued by the originator, or if the values subsequently decline and, as a result, less collateral value is available to satisfy interest and principal payments and any other fees in connection with the trust or other conduit arrangement for such securities, we may incur significant losses. Also, with respect to the CLOs and CDOs in which we may invest, control over the related underlying loans will be exercised through a special servicer or collateral manager designated by a “directing certificate holder” or a “controlling class representative,” or otherwise pursuant to the related securitization documents. We may acquire classes of CLOs or CDOs for which we may not have the right to appoint the directing certificate holder or otherwise direct the special servicing or collateral management. With respect to the management and servicing of those loans, the related special servicer or collateral manager may take actions that could adversely affect our interests. In addition to the risks associated with debt instruments (e.g., interest rate risk and credit risk), CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments, (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default, (iii) the possibility that we may invest in CDOs that are subordinate to other classes and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results.

We may invest in real estate corporate debt, which consists of secured and unsecured obligations issued by companies in the business of owning and/or operating real estate related businesses.

We may invest in corporate debt obligations of varying maturities issued by U.S. and foreign corporations and other business entities, which may include loans, corporate bonds, debentures, notes and other similar corporate debt instruments, including convertible securities. Bonds are fixed- or variable-rate debt obligations, including bills, notes, debentures, money market instruments and similar instruments and securities. Corporate debt is generally used by corporations and other issuers to borrow money from investors. The issuer pays the investor a rate of interest and normally must repay the amount borrowed on or before maturity. The rate of interest on corporate debt may be fixed, floating or variable, and may vary inversely with respect to a reference rate. The rate of return or return of principal on some debt obligations may be linked or indexed to the level of exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and a foreign currency or currencies. Debt instruments may be acquired with warrants attached. Certain bonds are “perpetual” in that they have no maturity date.

Our investments in real estate related corporate credit will be subject to a number of risks, including interest rate risk, credit risk, high yield risk, issuer risk, foreign (non-U.S.) investment risk, inflation/deflation risk, liquidity risk, smaller company risk and management risk. We generally will not have direct recourse to real estate assets owned or operated by the issuers of the corporate debt obligations that we invest in and the value of such corporate debt obligations may be impacted by numerous factors and may not be closely tied to the value of the real estate held by the corporate issuer.

We may invest in structured products or similar products that may include structural and legal risks.

We may invest from time to time in structured products, including pools of mortgages, loans and other real estate related securities. These investments may include debt securities issued by a private investment fund that invests, on a leveraged basis, in bank loans, high-yield debt or other asset groups, and certificates issued by a structured investment vehicle that holds pools of commercial mortgage loans. We may also invest in credit risk transfer notes that, while not structured products, face similar risks as structured products because they are debt securities issued by governmental agencies but their value depends in part on a pool of mortgage loans. Our investments in structured products will be subject to a number of risks, including risks related to the fact that the structured products will be leveraged, and other structural and legal risks related thereto. Utilization of leverage is a speculative investment technique and will generally magnify the opportunities for gain and risk of loss borne by an investor investing in the subordinated debt securities. Many structured products contain covenants designed to protect the providers of debt financing to such structured products. A failure to satisfy those covenants could result in the untimely liquidation of the structured product and a complete loss of our investment therein. In addition, if the particular structured product is invested in a security in which we are also invested, this would tend to increase our overall exposure to the credit of the issuer of such securities, at least on an absolute, if not on a relative basis. The value of an investment in a structured product will depend on the investment performance of the assets in which the structured product invests and will, therefore, be subject to all of the risks associated with an investment in those assets. These risks include the possibility of a default by, or bankruptcy of, the issuers of such assets or a claim that the pledging of collateral to secure any such asset constituted a fraudulent conveyance or preferential transfer that can be subordinated to the rights of other creditors of the issuer of such asset or nullified under applicable law.

We may invest in high-yield debt, which is subject to more risk than higher-rated securities.

Debt instruments that are, at the time of purchase, rated below investment grade (below Baa by Moody’s and below BBB by S&P and Fitch), rated at an equivalent rating assigned by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization or unrated but judged by our Adviser to be of comparable quality are commonly referred to as “high-yield” securities.

Investments in high-yield securities generally provide greater income and increased opportunity for capital appreciation than investments in higher-quality securities, but they also typically entail greater price volatility and principal and income risk, including the possibility of issuer default and bankruptcy. High-yield securities are regarded as predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to meet principal and interest payments. Debt instruments in the lowest investment grade category also may be considered to possess some speculative characteristics by certain rating agencies. In addition, analysis of the creditworthiness of issuers of high-yield securities may be more complex than for issuers of higher quality securities.

High-yield securities may be more susceptible to real or perceived adverse economic and competitive industry conditions than investment-grade securities. A projection of an economic downturn or of a period of rising interest rates, for example, could cause a decline in high-yield security prices because the advent of a recession could lessen the ability of an issuer to make principal and interest payments on its debt obligations. If an issuer of high-yield securities defaults, in addition to risking non-payment of all or a portion of interest and principal, we may incur additional expenses to seek recovery. The market prices of high-yield securities structured as zero-coupon, step-up or payment-in-kind securities will normally be affected to a greater extent by interest rate changes, and therefore tend to be more volatile than the prices of securities that pay interest currently and in cash.

The secondary market on which high-yield securities are traded may be less liquid than the market for investment grade securities. Less liquidity in the secondary trading market could adversely affect the price at which we could sell a high-yield security, and could adversely affect the NAV of our shares. Adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may decrease the values and liquidity of high-yield securities, especially in a thinly traded market. When secondary markets for high-yield securities are less liquid than the market for investment-grade securities, it may be more difficult to value the securities because such valuation may require more research, and elements of judgment may play a greater role in the valuation because there is less reliable, objective data available. During periods of thin trading in these markets, the spread between bid and asked prices is likely to increase significantly, and we may have greater difficulty selling our portfolio securities. We will be more dependent on our Adviser’s research and analysis when investing in high-yield securities.

We may invest in equity securities of real estate owners, which is subordinate to any indebtedness of such owners.

We may invest from time to time in non-controlling preferred equity positions, common equity and other equity securities issued by real estate companies. Preferred equity investments generally rank junior to all existing and future indebtedness, including commercial mezzanine and mortgage loans, but rank senior to the owners’ common equity. Preferred equity investments typically pay a dividend rather than interest payments and often have the right for such dividends to accrue if there is insufficient cash flow to pay currently. These interests are not secured by the underlying real estate, but upon the occurrence of a default, the preferred equity provider typically has the right to effectuate a change of control with respect to the ownership of the property. In addition, equity investments may be illiquid or have limited liquidity due to lock-out periods, limited trading volume or other limitations or prohibitions against their transfer, sale, pledge or disposition, including any necessary registration with the SEC requiring coordination with the issuer for the sale of such securities. Our investments in equity securities issued by real estate companies will involve risks relating to the particular issuer of the equity securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer. Issuers of real estate related equity securities are subject to their own operating and other expenses and may be subject to a management fee and performance-based compensation (e.g., promote), which we as equity holders will indirectly bear. Issuers of real estate related equity securities generally invest in real estate or real estate related securities and are subject to the inherent risks associated with real estate discussed in “—General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate.”

We may invest in equity of other REITs that invest in real estate or real estate debt as one of their core businesses and other real estate related companies, which subjects us to certain risks including those risks associated with an investment in our own common stock.

REITs that invest primarily in real estate or real estate debt are subject to the risks of the real estate market, the real estate debt market and the securities market. REITs are dependent upon specialized management skills, have limited diversification and are, therefore, subject to risks inherent in financing a limited number of projects. REITs may be subject to management fees and other expenses. When we invest in REITs, we will bear our proportionate share of the costs of the REITs’ operations. Investing in REITs and real estate related companies involves certain unique risks in addition to those risks associated with investing in the real estate industry in general. The market value of REIT shares and the ability of the REIT to distribute income may be adversely affected by several factors, including the risks described herein that relate to an investment in our common stock. REITs depend generally on their ability to generate cash flow to make distributions to shareholders, and certain REITs have self-liquidation provisions by which mortgages held may be paid in full and distributions of capital returns may be made at any time. In addition, distributions received by us from REITs may consist of dividends, capital gains and/or return of capital. Generally, dividends received by us from REIT shares and distributed to our stockholders will not constitute “qualified dividend income” eligible for the reduced tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income. In addition, the performance of a REIT may be affected by changes in the tax laws or by its failure to qualify for tax-free pass-through of income.

REITs (especially mortgage REITs) are also subject to interest rate risk. Rising interest rates may cause REIT investors to demand a higher annual yield, which may, in turn, cause a decline in the market price of the equity securities issued by a REIT.

Investing in certain REITs and real estate related companies, which often have small market capitalizations, may also involve the same risks as investing in other small capitalization companies. REITs and real estate related companies may have limited financial resources, and their securities may trade less frequently and in limited volume and may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than larger company securities.

We may invest in derivatives, which involve numerous risks.

We may enter into derivatives transactions including, but not limited to, options contracts, futures contracts, options on futures contracts, forward contracts, interest rate swaps, total return swaps, credit default swaps and other swap agreements for investment, hedging or leverage purposes. Derivative instruments, especially when purchased in large amounts, may not be liquid in all circumstances, so that in volatile markets we may not be able to close out a position without incurring a loss. Our use of derivative

instruments may be particularly speculative and involves investment risks and transaction costs to which we would not be subject absent the use of these instruments, and use of derivatives generally involves leverage in the sense that the investment exposure created by the derivatives may be significantly greater than our initial investment in the derivative. Leverage magnifies investment, market and certain other risks. Thus, the use of derivatives may result in losses in excess of principal and greater than if they had not been used. The value of such derivatives also depends upon the price of the underlying instrument or commodity. Such derivatives and other customized instruments also are subject to the risk of non-performance by the relevant counterparty. In addition, actual or implied daily limits on price fluctuations and speculative position limits on the exchanges or over-the-counter markets in which we may conduct our transactions in derivative instruments may prevent prompt liquidation of positions, subjecting us to the potential of greater losses. Derivative instruments that may be purchased or sold by us may include instruments not traded over-the-counter or on an exchange. The risk of nonperformance by the obligor on such an instrument may be greater and the ease with which we can dispose of or enter into closing transactions with respect to such an instrument may be less than in the case of an exchange-traded instrument. In addition, significant disparities may exist between “bid” and “asked” prices for derivative instruments that are traded over-the-counter and not on an exchange. Such over-the-counter derivatives are also subject to types and levels of investor protections or governmental regulation that may differ from exchange traded instruments.

The ability to successfully use derivative investments depends on the ability of our Adviser. The skills needed to employ derivatives strategies are different from those needed to select portfolio investments and, in connection with such strategies, our Adviser must make predictions with respect to market conditions, liquidity, market values, interest rates or other applicable factors, which may be inaccurate. The use of derivative investments may require us to sell or purchase portfolio investments at inopportune times or for prices below or above the current market values, may limit the amount of appreciation we can realize on an investment or may cause us to hold a security that we might otherwise want to sell. We will also be subject to credit risk with respect to the counterparties to our derivatives contracts (whether a clearing corporation in the case of exchange-traded instruments or another third party in the case of over-the-counter instruments). In addition, the use of derivatives will be subject to additional unique risks associated with such instruments including a lack of sufficient asset correlation, heightened volatility in reference to interest rates or prices of reference instruments and duration/term mismatch, each of which may create additional risk of loss.

We may face risks associated with short sales.

Our use of short sales for investment and/or risk management purposes subjects us to risks associated with selling short. We may engage in short sales where we do not own or have the right to acquire the security sold short at no additional cost. Our loss on a short sale theoretically could be unlimited in a case where we are unable, for whatever reason, to close out a short position.

Our short selling strategies may limit our ability to benefit from increases in the markets. Short selling also involves a form of financial leverage that may exaggerate any losses. Also, there is the risk that the counterparty to a short sale may fail to honor its contractual terms, causing a loss to us. Finally, the SEC, FINRA or other regulations relating to short selling may restrict our ability to engage in short selling.

We may make open market purchases or invest in traded securities.

We have the ability to invest in securities that are traded (publicly or through other active markets (including through private transactions)) and are, therefore, subject to the risks inherent in investing in traded securities. When investing in traded securities, we may be unable to obtain financial covenants or other contractual governance rights, including management rights that we might otherwise be able to obtain in making privately negotiated investments. Moreover, we may not have the same access to information in connection with investments in traded securities, either when investigating a potential investment or after making the investment, as compared to privately negotiated investments. Furthermore, we may be limited in our ability to make investments, and to sell existing investments, in traded securities because our Adviser may be deemed to have material, non-public information regarding the issuers of those securities or as a result of other internal policies or requirements. The inability to sell traded securities in these circumstances could materially adversely affect the investment results. In addition, securities acquired of a public company may, depending on the circumstances and securities laws of the relevant jurisdiction, be subject to lock-up periods.

Failure to obtain and maintain an exemption from being regulated as a commodity pool operator could subject us to additional regulation compliance requirements that could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Registration with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) as a “commodity pool operator” or any change in our operations (including, without limitation, any change that causes us to be subject to certain specified covered statutory disqualifications) necessary to maintain our ability to rely upon the exemption from being regulated as a commodity pool operator could adversely affect our ability to implement our investment program, conduct our operations or achieve our objectives and subject us to certain additional costs, expenses and administrative burdens. Furthermore, any determination by us to cease or to limit entering into hedging transactions that may be treated as “commodity interests” in order to comply with the regulations of the CFTC may have a material adverse effect on our ability to implement our investment objectives and to hedge risks associated with our operations.

Risks Related to Debt Financing

We incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which increases our financial risks, could hinder our ability to make distributions and could decrease the value of your investment.

The acquisition of investment properties may be financed in substantial part by borrowing, which increases our exposure to loss. Under our charter, we have a limitation that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of our net assets, which approximates borrowing 75% of the cost of our investments (unless a majority of our independent directors approves any borrowing in excess of the limit and we disclose the justification for doing so to our stockholders), but such restriction does not restrict the amount of indebtedness we may incur with respect to any single investment. Our target leverage ratio after our ramp-up period is approximately 50% to 60%. Our leverage ratio is measured by dividing (i) consolidated property-level and entity-level debt net of cash and loan-related restricted cash, by (ii) the asset value of real estate investments (measured using the greater of fair market value and cost) plus the equity in our real estate related securities portfolio. See “Investment Objectives and Strategies—Borrowing Policies.” We may exceed our target leverage ratio, particularly during a market downturn or in connection with a large acquisition. The use of leverage involves a high degree of financial risk and will increase the exposure of the investments to adverse economic factors such as rising interest rates, downturns in the economy or deteriorations in the condition of the investments. Principal and interest payments on indebtedness (including mortgages having “balloon” payments) will have to be made regardless of the sufficiency of cash flow from the properties. Our investments will be impaired by a smaller decline in the value of the properties than would be the case if our properties were owned with a smaller amount of debt.

We may incur or increase our mortgage debt by obtaining loans secured by a portfolio of some or all of the real estate acquired and may borrow under mortgages on properties after they are acquired. Depending on the level of leverage and decline in value, if mortgage payments are not made when due, one or more of the properties may be lost (and our investment therein rendered valueless) as a result of foreclosure by the mortgagee. A foreclosure may also have substantial adverse tax consequences for us.

Many of these same issues also apply to credit facilities which are expected to be in place at various times as well. For example, the loan documents for such facilities may include various coverage ratios, the continued compliance with which may not be completely within our control. If such coverage ratios are not met, the lenders under such credit facilities may declare any unfunded commitments to be terminated and declare any amounts outstanding to be due and payable. We may also rely on short-term financing that would be especially exposed to changes in availability.

Although borrowings by us have the potential to enhance overall returns that exceed our cost of funds, they will further diminish returns (or increase losses on capital) to the extent overall returns are less than our cost of funds. As a result, the possibilities of profit and loss are increased. Borrowing money to purchase properties exposes us to greater market risks and higher current expenses.

Inability to access funding could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and business.

Our results of operations, financial condition and business may be impacted by our ability to secure bank credit facilities (including term loans and revolving facilities) and derivative instruments, in addition to transaction or asset specific funding arrangements, on acceptable terms. We may also rely on short-term financing that would be especially exposed to changes in availability. Our access to sources of financing will depend upon a number of factors, over which we have little or no control, including:

We may need to periodically access the capital markets to, among other things, raise cash to fund new investments, fund repurchases under our share repurchase plan and for other corporate purposes. Unfavorable economic conditions or capital market conditions may increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or could result in a decision by our potential lenders not to extend credit. An inability to successfully access the capital markets could limit our ability to grow our business and fully execute our business strategy and could decrease our earnings and liquidity. In addition, any dislocation or weakness in the capital and credit markets could adversely affect our lenders and could cause one or more of our lenders to be unwilling or unable to provide us with financing or to increase the costs of that financing. In addition, as regulatory capital requirements imposed on our lenders are increased, they may be required to limit, or increase the cost of, financing they provide to us. In general, this could potentially increase our financing costs and reduce our liquidity or require us to sell assets at an inopportune time or price. We cannot make assurances that we will be able to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all.

We may encounter adverse changes in the credit markets.

Any adverse changes in the global credit markets could make it more difficult for us to obtain favorable financing. Our ability to generate attractive investment returns for our stockholders will be adversely affected to the extent we are unable to obtain favorable financing terms. If we are unable to obtain favorable financing terms, we may not be able to adequately leverage our portfolio, may face increased financing expenses or may face increased restrictions on our investment activities, any of which would negatively impact our performance.

In certain cases, financings for our properties may be recourse to us.

Generally, commercial real estate financings are structured as non-recourse to the borrower, which limits a lender’s recourse to the property pledged as collateral for the loan, and not the other assets of the borrower or to any parent of borrower, in the event of a loan default. However, lenders customarily will require that a creditworthy parent entity enter into so-called “recourse carveout” guarantees to protect the lender against certain bad-faith or other intentional acts of the borrower in violation of the loan documents. A “bad boy” guarantee typically provides that the lender can recover losses from the guarantors for certain bad acts, such as fraud or intentional misrepresentation, intentional waste, willful misconduct, criminal acts, misappropriation of funds, voluntary incurrence of prohibited debt and environmental losses sustained by lender. In addition, “bad boy” guarantees typically provide that the loan will be a full personal recourse obligation of the guarantor, for certain actions, such as prohibited transfers of the collateral or changes of control and voluntary bankruptcy of the borrower. Financing arrangements with respect to our investments will generally require “bad boy” guarantees from us and in the event that such a guarantee is called, our assets could be adversely affected. Moreover, our “bad boy” guarantees could apply to actions of the joint venture partners associated with our investments. Although our Adviser expects to negotiate indemnities from such joint venture partners to protect against such risks, there remains the possibility that the acts of such joint venture partner could result in liability to us under such guarantees.

If we draw on a line of credit to fund repurchases or for any other reason, our financial leverage ratio could increase beyond our target.

We may seek to obtain lines of credit in an effort to provide for a ready source of liquidity for any business purpose, including to fund repurchases of shares of our common stock. There can be no assurances that we will be able to borrow under or maintain our lines of credit or obtain additional lines of credit on financially reasonable terms. In addition, we may not be able to obtain lines of credit of an appropriate size for our business. If we borrow under a line of credit to fund repurchases of shares of our common stock, our financial leverage will increase and may exceed our target leverage ratio. Our leverage may remain at the higher level until we receive additional net proceeds from our continuous offering or generate sufficient operating cash flow or proceeds from asset sales to repay outstanding indebtedness. In connection with a line of credit, distributions may be subordinated to payments required in connection with any indebtedness contemplated thereby.

Volatility in the financial markets and challenging economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to secure debt financing on attractive terms and our ability to service or refinance any indebtedness that we may incur.

The volatility of the credit markets could make it more difficult to obtain favorable financing for investments. During periods of volatility, which often occur during economic downturns, generally credit spreads widen, interest rates rise and investor demand for high-yield debt declines. These trends result in reduced willingness by investment banks and other lenders to finance new investments and deterioration of available terms. If the overall cost of borrowing increases, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, the increased costs may result in acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing future cash flow available for distribution. Disruptions in the debt markets negatively impact our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to reduce the number of properties we can purchase, and the return on the properties we do purchase may be lower. In addition, we may find it difficult, costly or impossible to refinance indebtedness that is maturing. Moreover, to the extent that such marketplace events are not temporary, they could have an adverse impact on the availability of credit to businesses generally and could lead to an overall weakening of the U.S. economy.

If we obtain variable rate financing in the future, increasing or sustained elevated interest rates could increase the amount of our loan payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Interest we pay on our loan obligations will reduce cash available for distributions. In the future, we will likely obtain variable rate loans, and as a result, increases in interest rates or sustained elevated interest rates could increase our interest costs, which could reduce our cash flows and our ability to make distributions. In addition, if we need to repay existing loans during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments at times that may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments. There is uncertainty with respect to legal, tax and regulatory regimes in which we and our

investments, as well as the Advisor and its affiliates, will operate. Any significant changes in, among other things, economic policy (including with respect to interest rates and foreign trade), the regulation of the investment management industry, tax law, immigration policy or government entitlement programs could have a material adverse impact on us and our investments.

Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to obtain additional loans. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage or dispose of the property or discontinue insurance coverage. In addition, loan documents may limit our ability to enter into or terminate certain operating or lease agreements related to the property. Loan documents may also require lender approval of certain actions and as a result of the lender’s failure to grant such approval, we may not be able to take a course of action we deem most profitable. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to make distributions to you and the value of your investment.

If we enter into financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations, it may adversely affect stockholder returns.

Some of our financing arrangements may require us to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain replacement financing or our ability to sell particular properties. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the particular property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. Such a refinancing would be dependent upon interest rates and lenders’ policies at the time of refinancing, economic conditions in general and the value of the underlying properties in particular. The effect of a refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to stockholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets.

Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Subject to any limitations required to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility by using interest rate hedging arrangements, such as interest rate cap or collar agreements and interest rate swap agreements. These agreements involve risks, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements and that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. These interest rate hedging arrangements may create additional assets or liabilities from time to time that may be held or liquidated separately from the underlying property or loan for which they were originally established. Hedging may reduce the overall returns on our investments. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may enter into loans with cross-collateralization provisions, which may heighten the risk of a default on any particular loan and increase the risk of a loss in the value of your investment in us.

We may enter into loans with cross-collateralization provisions that provide that a default under any obligation of a certain dollar threshold or more by us constitutes a default under the loan. If any of our future investments are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay distributions may be limited, which would have an adverse effect on your investment in us.

Risks Related to our Relationship with our Adviser

We depend on our Adviser to select our investments and otherwise conduct our business, and any material adverse change in its financial condition or our relationship with our Adviser could have a material adverse effect on our business and ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Our success is dependent upon our relationship with, and the performance of, our Adviser in the acquisition and management of our investments and our corporate operations. Our Adviser may suffer adverse financial or operational problems in connection with its business and activities unrelated to us and over which we have no control. Should our Adviser fail to allocate sufficient resources to perform its responsibilities to us for any reason, we may be unable to achieve our investment objectives.

The termination or replacement of our Adviser could trigger a repayment event under a mortgage loan for a property or a credit agreement governing a line of credit.

Lenders may request provisions in mortgage loan documentation that would make the termination or replacement of our Adviser an event requiring the immediate repayment of the full outstanding balance of the loan. The termination or replacement of our Adviser could also trigger repayment of outstanding amounts under credit agreements that may govern lines of credit that we may obtain. If a repayment event occurs with respect to any of our properties, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Our Adviser’s inability to retain the services of key real estate professionals could hurt our performance.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of certain key real estate professionals employed by our Adviser, each of whom would be difficult to replace. There is increasing competition among alternative asset firms, financial institutions, private equity firms, investment advisors, investment managers, real estate investment companies, real estate investment trusts and other industry participants for hiring and retaining qualified investment professionals. Although certain senior executives of our Adviser are covered under key man insurance and/or employment agreements, there can be no assurance that such professionals will continue to be associated with us or our Adviser, particularly in light of our perpetual-life nature, or that replacements will perform well. If any of these persons were to cease their association with our Adviser, our operating results could suffer. Our future success depends, in large part, upon our Adviser’s ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, operational, investment and marketing professionals. If our Adviser loses or is unable to obtain the services of highly skilled professionals, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered.

We do not own the EQT Exeter name, but we may use it as part of our corporate name pursuant to a trademark license agreement with our Sponsor. Use of the name by other parties or the termination of our trademark license agreement may harm our business.

We have entered into a trademark license agreement (“Trademark License Agreement”), with our Sponsor (the “Licensor”), pursuant to which it grants us a fully paid-up, royalty-free, non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use the name “EQT Exeter Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.” and the EQT EXETER trademark. The Trademark License Agreement grants us the right to use the EQT EXETER trademark for a term that continues in perpetuity unless termination occurs pursuant to the terms of the agreement. The parties may terminate the Trademark License Agreement by mutual agreement at any time. Licensor may terminate the Trademark License Agreement at any time upon 90 days’ written notice, or upon 15 days’ written notice if Licensor deems it necessary in order to settle any claim of infringement, unfair competition or similar claim, against Licensor and/or us, arising out of the use of the marks. Licensor may terminate the Trademark License Agreement if we materially breach any provisions of the agreement, provided that we shall have 30 days after receiving written notice from Licensor to cure such breach, and if we have not accomplished such cure to Licensor’s satisfaction, then in Licensor’s reasonable discretion, Licensor may terminate the agreement immediately upon further written notice to us. Licensor may immediately terminate the Trademark License Agreement in the event of our voluntary or involuntary insolvency, bankruptcy or liquidation of assets, without need for notice of termination. Licensor may immediately terminate the Trademark License Agreement in the event that the Advisory Agreement expires or is terminated. Licensor and its affiliates will retain the right to continue using the EQT EXETER trademark. We will further be unable to preclude the Licensor from licensing or transferring the ownership of the EQT EXETER trademark to third parties, some of whom may compete with us. Consequently, we will be unable to prevent any damage to goodwill that may occur as a result of the activities of the Licensor, our Adviser or others. Furthermore, in the event that the Trademark License Agreement is terminated, we will be required to, among other things, change our name. Any of these events could disrupt our recognition in the marketplace, damage any goodwill we may have generated and otherwise harm our business.

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest

We pay our Adviser, the Dealer Manager and their affiliates fees, which could lead to conflicts of interest.

Our Adviser, the Dealer Manager and their affiliates receive substantial fees from us, which fees were not negotiated at arm’s length. Such fees could influence our Adviser’s advice to us as well as the judgment of its affiliates, some of whom also serve as our executive officers and our directors. Among other matters, these compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

These conflicts of interest may not be resolved in our favor.

Our Adviser and its affiliates have interests in other programs or accounts sponsored, advised or managed by our Adviser or its affiliates, which gives rise to conflicts of interest.

Our Adviser and its affiliates sponsor, advise or manage Other EQT Real Estate Accounts. All of our executive officers and our affiliated directors are also officers, directors, managers and/or key professionals of and/or holders of direct or indirect interests in (i) our Adviser, (ii) other affiliated investment advisers that are the sponsor, adviser or manager of Other EQT Real Estate Accounts, or (iii) Other EQT Real Estate Accounts. Our Adviser and its affiliates have legal and financial obligations with respect to Other EQT Real Estate Accounts sponsored, advised or managed by them. In the future, our Adviser and its affiliates are expected to sponsor, advise and manage Other EQT Real Estate Accounts.

Conflicts of interest may arise between us and the current and future Other EQT Real Estate Accounts sponsored, advised or managed by our Adviser and its affiliates, including with respect to:

These conflicts of interest could result in decisions that are less favorable to us than they otherwise would be.

Certain Other EQT Real Estate Accounts have similar or overlapping investment objectives and guidelines, and we will not be allocated certain opportunities.

We rely on our Adviser to present investment opportunities to us. Our Adviser and its affiliates also sponsor, advise and manage Other EQT Real Estate Accounts. While our Adviser believes our investment objectives, guidelines and strategy are generally distinct from Other EQT Real Estate Accounts, there will be overlap of real property and real estate related securities investment opportunities with certain Other EQT Real Estate Accounts that are actively investing and similar overlap with future Other EQT Real Estate Accounts. This overlap could create conflicts of interest, which our Adviser and its affiliates will seek to manage in a fair and reasonable manner in their sole discretion in accordance with their prevailing policies and procedures.

With respect to Other EQT Real Estate Accounts with investment objectives or guidelines that overlap with ours but that do not have priority over us, investment opportunities will be allocated among us and one or more Other EQT Real Estate Accounts in accordance with our Adviser’s prevailing policies and procedures on a basis that our Adviser and its affiliates determine to be fair and reasonable in their sole discretion, subject to the following considerations: (i) any applicable investment objectives of ours and such Other EQT Real Estate Accounts (which, for us, includes our primary objective of providing attractive current income in the form of regular, stable cash distributions), (ii) any investment limitations, parameters or contractual provisions of ours and such Other EQT

Real Estate Accounts (e.g., a joint venture between us and an Other EQT Real Estate Account must be approved by a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) as being fair and reasonable to us and on substantially the same, or more favorable, terms and conditions as those received by other joint venture partners), (iii) the sector, geography/location, expected return profile, expected distribution rates, anticipated cash flows, expected stability or volatility of cash flows, leverage profile, risk profile and other features of the applicable investment opportunity and its impact on portfolio concentration and diversification, (iv) maintaining structuring and financing flexibility, (v) legal, tax, accounting and regulatory considerations, (vi) any other requirements or considerations set forth in the governing documents of any Other EQT Real Estate Account and (vii) other considerations deemed relevant by our Adviser and its affiliates (including, without limitation, qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT and our ability to avoid registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act).

Currently, Other EQT Real Estate Accounts invest in “core+” real estate assets in the United States (which are generally substantially stabilized assets, but typically with shorter lease durations and higher return targets than we will target), with a focus on major U.S. markets. Additionally, in the future, our Adviser may launch Other EQT Real Estate Accounts that will focus on industrial/logistics, multifamily/living and other property types in major U.S. markets (collectively, the current and future accounts with similar investment strategies, the “Private Core+ Accounts”).

Our Adviser believes there likely will be limited overlap of investment opportunities for us and the Private Core+ Accounts because of our primary investment objective of providing current income. Further, the Private Core+ Accounts are structured in finite life closed-end vehicles that are intended to aggregate portfolios for sale once value has been achieved through improved operations at the asset level. Accordingly, the success of the Private Core+ Accounts are determined more by equity appreciation than our primary objective of providing less volatile risk-adjusted returns driven by current income.

To the extent an investment satisfies the investment objectives of us and the Private Core+ Accounts on the same terms, such investment will be allocated in accordance with our Adviser’s prevailing policies and procedures described above (including maintaining our ability to avoid registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act). To the extent we acquire properties through joint ventures with Other EQT Real Estate Accounts, such investments will be allocated as described above, and we may be allocated interests in such joint ventures that are smaller than the interests of the Other EQT Real Estate Accounts. Generally, the level of control we have with respect to any joint venture will correspond to our economic interest in such joint venture.

Furthermore, certain of the Other EQT Real Estate Accounts that invest in “value-add” real estate and real estate related assets in the United States (which often are undermanaged assets and with higher potential for equity appreciation) have priority over us with respect to such investment opportunities (together with future accounts with similar investment strategies, the “Select Value-Add EQT Real Estate Accounts”). As of December 31, 2025, there is one Select Value-Add EQT Real Estate Account currently investing in real estate in the United States. No Other EQT Real Estate Accounts other than the Select Value-Add EQT Real Estate Account have priority over us with respect to investment opportunities.

Our Adviser and its affiliates will calculate available capital, weigh the factors described above (which will not be weighted equally) and make other investment allocation decisions in accordance with their prevailing policies and procedures in their sole discretion. The manner in which our available capital is determined may differ from, or subsequently change with respect to, Other EQT Real Estate Accounts. The amounts and forms of leverage utilized for investments will also be determined by our Adviser and its affiliates in their sole discretion, subject to the limitations of our charter and oversight of our board of directors. There is no assurance that any conflicts arising out of the foregoing will be resolved in our favor. Our Adviser is entitled to amend its policies and procedures at any time without prior notice or our consent.

Our Adviser faces a conflict of interest because the fees it receives for services performed are based in part on our NAV, which our Adviser is ultimately responsible for determining.

We (and, to the extent that the Operating Partnership issues Operating Partnership units to parties other than us, the Operating Partnership) will pay our Adviser a management fee based on our NAV, excluding the NAV of the Class E shares and Class E units which are not subject to the management fee. In addition, the Special Limited Partner, an affiliate of our Adviser, is entitled to receive distributions on its performance participation interest in the Operating Partnership based on the Operating Partnership’s annualized total return, which is calculated based upon our total distributions paid plus the change in the Operating Partnership’s NAV, excluding the distributions and NAV attributable to the Class E units which are not subject to the performance participation. Although third-party appraisals will be utilized in the calculation of our NAV, such appraisals will be based in part on information and estimates provided by our Adviser. Other components of our NAV will also be based on the subjective judgments of personnel of our Adviser. Therefore, there is a risk that conflicts of interest could influence the fees payable to our Adviser and the distributions payable to the Special Limited Partner.

Our Adviser and its employees and affiliates may invest for their own accounts.

Our Adviser and its employees and affiliates may engage in investment activities for their personal accounts, which may involve the purchase and sale of securities that are the same as, but in different concentrations or effectuated at different times and prices than, those purchased or sold by us. However, since entering into new or augmented positions of most publicly traded equity and debt securities (and options, futures and derivatives thereon) is generally prohibited under our Adviser’s Code of Ethics, the aforementioned activities would generally only occur when there is a sale of a security that was either entered into prior to an employee’s start date or previously pre-approved prior to the date when the policy that effected the prohibition was implemented. In addition, they may also involve the purchase and sale of securities that are different from those purchased by us. Additionally, our Adviser’s principals, employees and other affiliates may engage in limited investment activities, which may from time to time involve passive investments in companies or funds that may have dealings with our Adviser.

Our Adviser may come into possession of information that may restrict our trading ability and that may not be provided to us.

Our Adviser is a global institutional real estate operator and investment fund manager that manages multiple investment strategies for Other EQT Real Estate Accounts. As part of its investment advisory activities, our Adviser and its affiliates sometimes come into possession of material non-public or price-sensitive information regarding other issuers, including both public and private companies, information that it will be prohibited from using for our benefit. This may occur, for example, if our Adviser obtains material, non-public information or enters into a nondisclosure agreement if it is contemplating a transaction in furtherance of certain investment strategies. Our Adviser may therefore be precluded from effecting transactions in issuers for our account as a result of the receipt of confidential or material, non-public information in furtherance of strategies on behalf of Other EQT Real Estate Accounts.

The financial or other benefits received by our Adviser from us may be less than such benefits received by our Adviser from Other EQT Real Estate Accounts.

A conflict of interest arises where the financial or other benefits available to our Adviser or its affiliates differ among the programs and accounts that it manages. If the amount or structure of the management fee, the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest and/or our Adviser’s or its affiliates’ compensation differs among programs and accounts (such as where certain funds or accounts pay higher base management fees, incentive fees, performance-based management fees or other fees), our Adviser or its affiliates might be motivated to help certain programs or accounts over others. Similarly, the desire to maintain assets under management or to enhance our Adviser’s performance record or to derive other rewards, financial or otherwise, could influence our Adviser or its affiliates in affording preferential treatment to those programs or accounts that could most significantly benefit our Adviser or its affiliates. Our Adviser may, for example, have an incentive to allocate favorable or limited opportunity investments or structure the timing of investments to favor certain programs or accounts. Additionally, our Adviser, our Sponsor or their affiliates might be motivated to favor other programs or accounts in which they have ownership interests. If an investment professional at our Adviser or its affiliates does not personally hold an investment in us but holds investments in other EQT Real Estate-affiliated vehicles, such investment professional’s conflicts of interest with respect to us may be more acute.

The fees we pay in connection with our offerings and the agreements we enter into with our Adviser, the Dealer Manager and their affiliates will not be determined on an arm’s-length basis and therefore may not be on the same terms we could achieve from a third party.

The compensation paid to our Adviser and the Dealer Manager for services they provide us and the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest were not determined on an arm’s-length basis. All service agreements, contracts or arrangements between or among our Adviser, the Dealer Manager and their affiliates and us will not be negotiated at arm’s-length. Such agreements include our Advisory Agreement, the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, the Dealer Manager Agreement, property management and leasing agreements, development and construction agreements and any property-related corporate services and other agreements we may enter into with affiliates of our Adviser from time to time.

Our Adviser’s management fee and the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest may not create proper incentives or may induce our Adviser and its affiliates to make certain investments, including speculative investments, that increase the risk of our real estate portfolio.

We (and, to the extent that the Operating Partnership issues Operating Partnership units to parties other than us, the Operating Partnership) will pay our Adviser a management fee based on our NAV, excluding the NAV of the Class E shares and Class E units which are not subject to the management fee, regardless of the performance of our portfolio. We are required to pay our Adviser a management fee in a particular period even if we experienced a net loss or a decline in the value of our portfolio during that period. Our Adviser’s entitlement to a management fee, which is not based upon performance metrics or goals, might reduce its incentive to devote its time and effort to seeking investments that provide attractive risk-adjusted returns for our portfolio. Because the management fee is based on our NAV, our Adviser may also be motivated to accelerate acquisitions in order to increase NAV or, similarly, delay or curtail repurchases to maintain a higher NAV.

The Special Limited Partner, an affiliate of our Adviser, is entitled to receive distributions on its performance participation interest in the Operating Partnership based on the Operating Partnership’s annualized total return, which is calculated based upon our total distributions paid plus the change in the Operating Partnership’s NAV, excluding the distributions and NAV attributable to the Class E units which are not subject to the performance participation. The existence of the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation interest in our Operating Partnership may create an incentive for our Adviser to recommend riskier or more speculative investments or to recommend us to use more leverage than it otherwise would. In addition, the change in NAV per share will be based on the value of our investments on the applicable measurement dates and not on realized gains or losses. As a result, the Special Limited Partner may receive distributions based on unrealized gains in certain assets at the time of such distributions and such gains may not be realized when those assets are eventually disposed of.

Our Adviser will consider client and other relationships and the reputation of our Adviser in managing us.

Our Adviser has long-term relationships with many significant participants in the real estate and related financial markets, including institutional investors, tenants, lenders and government agencies. Some of these parties may directly or indirectly compete with us for investment opportunities. Institutional investors with which our Adviser has longstanding relationships may invest in other investment funds or real estate assets. Our Adviser considers these relationships in its management of us. In this regard, there may be certain investment opportunities or certain investment strategies that our Adviser does not undertake on our behalf in view of these relationships or refers to clients instead of referring to us. Our Adviser’s advice and actions, with respect to any of its clients or proprietary accounts, may differ from the advice given, or may involve a different timing or nature of action taken, than with respect to us. Because of different objectives or other factors, a particular investment may be bought or sold by our Adviser or its investment funds, clients or the employees of our Adviser at a time when another one of these persons or entities is selling or purchasing such investment. Further, because of the importance of our Adviser’s reputation, our Adviser may or may not take certain actions in order to protect or preserve such reputation. Our Adviser’s consideration of these and other related factors give rise to various conflicts of interest, which may not be resolved in our favor.

We may sell or purchase assets to or from our Adviser and its affiliates, and the conflicts of interest inherent in such transactions could result in terms that are less favorable to us than they would be if the transactions were not with a related party.

We may sell or purchase assets to or from our Adviser and its affiliates. Although such transactions will be subject to the approval of a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction, there is still a risk that the conflicts of interest inherent in such transactions could result in terms that are less favorable to us than they would be if the transactions were not with a related party. This risk is heightened on account of our directors’ reliance, at least in part, on our Adviser and its affiliates for information regarding the proposed and alternative transactions. The possibility of such related-party transactions makes an investment in our shares more speculative than it otherwise would be.

Our Adviser will engage consultants, advisors and service providers on our behalf.

Our Adviser and entities affiliated with our Adviser will provide certain accounting, administrative and other services to us, and may charge expenses to us for the provision of such services by their internal staff that will be in addition to the management fee payable by us to our Adviser. Please see “Management—The Advisory Agreement—Management Fee, Performance Participation and Expense Reimbursements” and “Compensation” for further details.

Individual consultants or advisors (some of whom may be former employees of our Adviser) may be engaged by our Adviser on our behalf to provide consulting or advisory services to us. These consultants or advisors may not work exclusively for our Adviser or us. Compensation paid to these consultants or advisors for consulting/advisory services is generally borne by us, is not offset against the management fee paid to our Adviser and may include an annual fee and a discretionary performance-related bonus.

Our Adviser, on behalf of us and our investments, expects to engage service providers (including attorneys and consultants), some of which may also provide services to our Adviser and other programs or accounts managed by our Adviser or its affiliates. In addition, certain service providers to our Adviser, us and our investments may also be affiliates of our Adviser. These service providers may have business, financial, or other relationships with our Adviser or its employees, which may influence our Adviser’s selection of these service providers for us or our investments.

Our Adviser’s personnel work on other projects and conflicts may arise in the allocation of personnel and personnel time between us and other projects.

Our Adviser and its affiliates will devote such time as they determine to be necessary to conduct our business affairs in an appropriate manner. However, our Adviser’s personnel, including members of the advisory committee, will work on other projects, serve on other committees (including boards of directors) and source potential investments for and otherwise assist other programs and accounts, including other programs and accounts to be developed in the future. Time spent on these other initiatives diverts attention from our activities, which could negatively impact us. Furthermore, our Adviser and our Adviser’s personnel derive financial benefit from these other activities, including fees and performance-based compensation. Our Adviser’s personnel share in the fees and performance-based compensation generated by other programs and accounts. These and other factors create conflicts of interest in the allocation of time by such personnel.

Our Adviser may have interests in recommending that we invest alongside Other EQT Real Estate Accounts and such interests could cause us to make acquisitions that we otherwise would not make.

Our Adviser and its affiliates may become aware of investment opportunities that are too big for us or any Other EQT Real Estate Account to take on individually but which we and Other EQT Real Estate Accounts could acquire collectively. Our Adviser may have incentives to recommend that we invest in such an opportunity even if it would not be in our best interest in order that the Other EQT Real Estate Accounts not miss out on the opportunity and in order that our Adviser and its affiliates not miss out on the opportunity for higher fee income. The existence of Other EQT Real Estate Accounts and the possibility of investments alongside them, therefore, increases the risk that we may participate in an acquisition that is not in our best interest.

Our board of directors has adopted a resolution that renounces our interest or expectancy with respect to business opportunities and competitive activities.

Our board of directors has adopted a resolution that provides, subject to certain exceptions, that none of our Adviser or its affiliates, our directors or any person our directors control will be required to refrain directly or indirectly from engaging in any business opportunities, including any business opportunities in the same or similar business activities or lines of business in which we or any of our affiliates may from time to time be engaged or propose to engage, or from competing with us, and that we renounce any interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, any such business opportunities, unless offered to a person expressly and solely in his or her capacity as one of our directors or officers. As a result, our potential investment opportunities may be reduced.

Our Adviser will receive various kinds of information and data from us, which it may use without benefit to us.

Our Adviser will receive or obtain various kinds of data and information from us, Other EQT Real Estate Accounts and portfolio companies, including data and information relating to business operations, trends, budgets, customers and other metrics, some of which is sometimes referred to as “big data.” Our Adviser may enter into arrangements regarding information sharing and use with us, Other EQT Real Estate Accounts, portfolio companies, related parties and service providers which will give our Adviser access to (and rights regarding) data that it would not otherwise obtain in the ordinary course. Although our Adviser believes that these activities improve our Adviser’s investment management activities on our behalf and on behalf of Other EQT Real Estate Accounts, information obtained from us also provides material benefits to our Adviser or Other EQT Real Estate Accounts without compensation or other benefit accruing to us or our stockholders.

Furthermore, except for contractual obligations to third parties to maintain confidentiality of certain information, and regulatory limitations on the use of material nonpublic information, our Adviser will generally be free to use data and information from our activities to assist in the pursuit of our Adviser’s various other activities, including to trade for the benefit of our Adviser or an Other EQT Real Estate Account.

The sharing and use of “big data” and other information presents potential conflicts of interest, and any benefits received by our Adviser or its personnel (including fees, costs and expenses) will not offset our Adviser’s management fee or otherwise be shared with investors. As a result, our Adviser has an incentive to pursue investments that generate data and information that can be utilized in a manner that benefits our Adviser or Other EQT Real Estate Accounts.

We may be subject to potential conflicts of interest as a consequence of family relationships that our Adviser’s employees have with other real estate professionals.

Certain personnel and other professionals of our Adviser may have family members or relatives that are actively involved in industries and sectors in which we invest or may have business, personal, financial or other relationships with companies in such

industries and sectors (including the advisors and service providers described herein) or other industries, which gives rise to potential or actual conflicts of interest. For example, such family members or relatives might be officers, directors, personnel or owners of companies or assets that are actual or potential investments of ours or our other counterparties and properties. Moreover, in certain instances, we may purchase or sell companies or assets from or to, or otherwise transact with, companies that are owned by such family members or relatives or in respect of which such family members or relatives have other involvement. In most such circumstances, we will not be precluded from undertaking any of these investment activities or transactions.

Other potential or actual conflicts of interest may arise, and these conflicts may not be identified or resolved in a manner favorable to us.

Our Adviser has conflicts of interest, or conflicting loyalties, as a result of the numerous activities and relationships of our Adviser and the affiliates, partners, members, shareholders, officers, directors and employees of the foregoing, some of which are described herein. However, not all potential, apparent and actual conflicts of interest are included herein, and additional conflicts of interest could arise as a result of new activities, transactions or relationships commenced in the future. There can be no assurance that our board of directors or our Adviser will identify or resolve all conflicts of interest in a manner that is favorable to us.

In addition to the risks related to conflicts of interests in this section, see “—Risks Related to This Offering and Our Organizational Structure—The Dealer Manager has a limited operating history. The Dealer Manager may not be able to build and maintain a network of licensed broker-dealers, which failure could have a material adverse effect on our business and this offering” and “—Risks Related to This Offering and Our Organizational Structure—You will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review in connection with this offering and, if a conflict of interest arises between us and our Adviser or the Dealer Manager, we may incur additional fees and expenses.”

Risks Related to our REIT Status and Certain Other Tax Items

If we do not qualify as a REIT, we will be subject to tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability.

We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Code, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2024. However, qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations exist. Notwithstanding the availability of cure provisions in the Code, we may fail to meet various compliance requirements, which could jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, then:

To qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may have to borrow funds on a short-term basis during unfavorable market conditions.

To qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT, we generally must distribute annually to our stockholders a minimum of 90% of our net taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to regular corporate income taxes on any undistributed REIT taxable income each year. Additionally, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from previous years. Payments we make to our stockholders under our share repurchase plan will not be taken into account for purposes of these distribution requirements. If we do not have sufficient cash to make distributions necessary to preserve our REIT status for any year or to avoid taxation, we may be forced to borrow funds or sell assets even if the market conditions at that time are not favorable for these borrowings or sales. These options could increase our costs or reduce our equity.

Compliance with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities, which may hinder or delay our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce your overall return.

To qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required at all times to satisfy tests relating to, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the ownership of our stock and the amounts we distribute to our stockholders. Compliance with the REIT requirements may impair our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits. For example, we may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution.

Compliance with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate or restructure otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets. The remainder of our investments in securities (other than qualified real estate assets and government securities) generally cannot include more than 10% of the voting securities (other than securities that qualify for the straight debt safe harbor) of any one issuer or more than 10% of the value of the outstanding securities of more than any one issuer unless we and such issuer jointly elect for such issuer to be treated as a “taxable REIT subsidiary” under the Code. Debt will generally meet the “straight debt” safe harbor if the debt is a written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified date a certain sum of money, the debt is not convertible, directly or indirectly, into stock and the interest rate and the interest payment dates of the debt are not contingent on the profits, the borrower’s discretion or similar factors. Additionally, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% of the value of our assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries for taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2025 (for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, that percentage limit is increased from 20% to 25%), and no more than 25% of our assets may be represented by “nonqualified publicly offered REIT debt instruments.” If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must dispose of a portion of our assets within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions in order to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. In order to satisfy these requirements and qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may be forced to liquidate assets from our portfolio or not make otherwise attractive investments. These actions could reduce our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

Our charter does not permit any person or group to own more than 9.9% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding common stock or of our outstanding capital stock of all classes or series, and attempts to acquire our common stock or our capital stock of all other classes or series in excess of these 9.9% limits would not be effective without an exemption (prospectively or retroactively) from these limits by our board of directors.

For us to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% of the value of our outstanding stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (including certain entities treated as individuals for this purpose) during the last half of a taxable year. For the purpose of assisting our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, among other purposes, our charter prohibits beneficial or constructive ownership by any person or group of more than 9.9%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our outstanding common stock, or 9.9% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding capital stock of all classes or series, which we refer to as the “Ownership Limit.” The constructive ownership rules under the Code and our charter are complex and may cause shares of the outstanding common stock owned by a group of related persons to be deemed to be constructively owned by one person. As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.9% of our outstanding common stock or our capital stock by a person could cause another person to constructively own in excess of 9.9% of our outstanding common stock or our capital stock, respectively, and thus violate the Ownership Limit. There can be no assurance that our board of directors, as permitted in the charter, will not decrease this Ownership Limit in the future. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our common stock or capital stock in excess of the Ownership Limit without the consent of our board of directors will result either in the shares in excess of the limit being transferred by operation of our charter to a charitable trust, and the person who attempted to acquire such excess shares not having any rights in such excess shares, or in the transfer being void.

The Ownership Limit may have the effect of precluding a change in control of us by a third party, even if such change in control would be in the best interests of our stockholders or would result in receipt of a premium to the price of our common stock (and even if such change in control would not reasonably jeopardize our REIT status). The exemptions to the ownership limit granted to date may limit our board of directors’ power to increase the ownership limit or grant further exemptions in the future.

Non-U.S. holders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax upon their disposition of shares of our common stock or upon their receipt of certain distributions from us.

In addition to any potential withholding tax on ordinary dividends, a non-U.S. holder (as such term is defined below under “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of U.S. Holders of Our Common Stock”), other than a “qualified shareholder” or a “qualified foreign pension fund,” that disposes of a “U.S. real property interest” (“USRPI”) (which includes shares of stock of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of USRPIs), is generally subject to U.S. federal income tax under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, as amended (“FIRPTA”), on the amount received from such disposition. Such tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT that is “domestically controlled.” Generally, a REIT is domestically controlled if less than 50% of its stock, by value, has been owned directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons during a continuous five-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of the REIT’s existence. We cannot assure you that we will qualify as a domestically controlled REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, amounts received by a non-U.S. holder on certain dispositions of shares of our common stock (including a redemption) would be subject to tax under FIRPTA, unless (i) our shares of common stock were “regularly traded” on an established securities market and (ii) the non-U.S. holder did not, at any time during a specified testing period, hold more than 10% of our common stock. However, it is not anticipated that our common stock will be “regularly traded” on an established market. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders of Our Common Stock—Sales of Our Common Stock.”

A non-U.S. holder other than a “qualified shareholder” or a “qualified foreign pension fund” that receives a distribution from a REIT that is attributable to gains from the disposition of a USRPI as described above, including in connection with a repurchase of our common stock, is generally subject to U.S. federal income tax under FIRPTA to the extent such distribution is attributable to gains from such disposition, regardless of whether the difference between the fair market value and the tax basis of the USRPI giving rise to such gains is attributable to periods prior to or during such non-U.S. holder’s ownership of our common stock. In addition, a repurchase of our common stock, to the extent not treated as a sale or exchange, may be subject to withholding as an ordinary dividend. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders of Our Common Stock—Distributions” and “—Repurchases of our Common Stock.”

We seek to act in the best interests of our Company as a whole and not in consideration of the particular tax consequences to any specific holder of our stock. Potential non-U.S. holders should inform themselves as to the U.S. tax consequences, and the tax consequences within the countries of their citizenship, residence, domicile and place of business, with respect to the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock.

We may incur tax liabilities that would reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may become subject to U.S. federal income taxes and related state and local taxes. For example, net income from the sale of properties that are “dealer” properties sold by a REIT (a “prohibited transaction” under the Code) will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. Similarly, if we were to fail a gross income test (and did not lose our REIT status because such failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect) we would be subject to tax on the income that does not meet the gross income test requirements. We also may decide to retain net capital gain we earn from the sale or other disposition of our investments and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability unless they file U.S. federal income tax returns and thereon seek a refund of such tax. We also may be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, including franchise, payroll, mortgage recording and transfer taxes, either directly or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets, such as our taxable REIT subsidiaries, which are subject to full U.S. federal, state, local and foreign corporate-level income taxes. Any taxes we pay directly or indirectly will reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

Our board of directors is authorized to revoke our REIT election without stockholder approval, which may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders.

Our charter authorizes our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that changes to U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations or other considerations mean it is no longer in our best interests to qualify as a REIT. Our board of directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders. In this event, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and we would no longer be required to distribute most of our net income to our stockholders, which may cause a reduction in the total return to our stockholders.

You may have current tax liability on distributions you elect to reinvest in our common stock.

If you participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, you will be deemed to have received, and for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in shares of our common stock to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. Therefore, unless you are a tax-exempt entity, you may be forced to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the reinvested dividends.

Generally, ordinary dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for reduced U.S. federal income tax rates.

Currently, the maximum tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income payable to certain non-corporate U.S. stockholders is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rate. Although this does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause certain non-corporate investors to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our common stock. However, subject to certain limitations and requirements, taxpayers that are individuals, trusts or estates may generally be entitled to claim a deduction in determining their taxable income of 20% of ordinary REIT dividends (dividends other than capital gain dividends and dividends attributable to certain qualified dividend income received by us). The deduction, if allowed in full, equates to a maximum effective U.S. federal income tax rate on ordinary REIT dividends of 29.6%. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of U.S. Holders of Our Common Stock—Distributions Generally.” You are urged to consult with your tax advisor regarding your effective tax rate with respect to REIT dividends.

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability, reduce our operating flexibility and reduce the price of our common stock.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock.

Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur. We cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of our stockholders. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the impact of the recent legislation on your investment in our shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares. Although REITs generally receive certain tax advantages compared to entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a corporation. As a result, our charter authorizes our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to qualify as a REIT. The impact of tax reform on an investment in our shares is uncertain. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding changes in tax laws.

The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

We may acquire mezzanine loans, for which the IRS has provided a safe harbor but not rules of substantive law. Pursuant to the safe harbor, if a mezzanine loan meets certain requirements, it will be treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% gross income test. We may acquire mezzanine loans that do not meet all of the requirements of this safe harbor. In the event we own a mezzanine loan that does not meet the safe harbor, the IRS could challenge such loan’s treatment as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset and gross income tests and, if such a challenge were sustained, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

If our Operating Partnership failed to qualify as a partnership or is not otherwise disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would cease to qualify as a REIT.

If the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of our Operating Partnership as a partnership or disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it would be taxable as a corporation. In the event that this occurs, it would reduce the amount of distributions that our Operating Partnership could make to us. This would also result in our failing to qualify as a REIT and becoming subject to a corporate-level tax on our income, which would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and the yield on your investment.

We may not be able to recoup the costs associated with increased property taxes, which would adversely affect our performance and the value of your investment in us.

We may be responsible for paying real property taxes applicable to properties owned by us. The property taxes may increase as property tax rates change and as the properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. We may be unable to recoup such increased costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and the value of your investment.

Recharacterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.

We have and may in the future purchase real properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. We cannot guarantee that the IRS will not challenge our characterization of any sale-leaseback transactions. In the event that any such sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and recharacterized as a financing transaction or loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so recharacterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification asset tests or the gross income tests and, consequently, lose our REIT status. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirements for a taxable year.

Retirement Plan Risks

If the fiduciary of an employee benefit plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or ERISA, fails to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA, the Code or common law as a result of an investment in our stock, the fiduciary could be subject to civil penalties.

There are special considerations that apply to investing in our shares on behalf of a trust, pension, profit sharing or 401(k) plans, health or welfare plans, trusts, individual retirement accounts, or IRAs or Keogh plans. If you are investing the assets of any such benefit plans in our common stock, you should satisfy yourself that:

Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA, the Code or other applicable statutory or common law may result in the imposition of civil penalties and can subject the fiduciary to equitable remedies. In addition, if an investment in our shares constitutes a non-exempt prohibited transaction under Title I of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, the fiduciary that authorized or directed the investment may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested.

If our assets at any time are deemed to constitute “plan assets” under ERISA, that may lead to the rescission of certain transactions, tax or fiduciary liability and our being held in violation of certain ERISA and Code requirements.

Stockholders subject to ERISA should consult their own advisors as to the effect of ERISA on an investment in the shares. As discussed under “Certain ERISA Considerations,” if our assets are deemed to constitute “plan assets” of stockholders that are Covered Plans (as defined below), (i) certain transactions that we might enter into in the ordinary course of our business might have to be rescinded and may give rise to certain excise taxes and fiduciary liability under Title I of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code, (ii) our management, as well as various providers of fiduciary or other services to us (including our Adviser), and any other parties with authority or control with respect to us or our assets, may be considered fiduciaries or otherwise parties in interest or disqualified persons for purposes of the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited transaction provisions of Title I of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code, and (iii) the fiduciaries of stockholders that are Covered Plans would not be protected from “co-fiduciary liability” resulting from our decisions and could be in violation of certain ERISA requirements.

Under ERISA and the United States Department of Labor regulations, as modified by Section 3(42) of ERISA (the “Plan Assets Regulation”), generally when a Covered Plan acquires an “equity interest” in an entity that is neither a “publicly-offered security” (within the meaning of the Plan Assets Regulation) nor a security issued by an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act, the Covered Plan’s assets include both the equity interest and an undivided interest in each of the underlying assets of the entity, unless it is established either that less than 25% of the total value of each class of equity interest in the entity is held by “benefit plan investors” within the meaning of the Plan Assets Regulation (the “25% Test”) or that the entity is an “operating company” as defined in the Plan Assets Regulation. The Plan Assets Regulation defines an “equity interest” as any interest in an entity other than an instrument that is treated as indebtedness under applicable local law and which has no substantial equity features.

The definition of an “operating company” in the Plan Assets Regulation includes, among other things, a “venture capital operating company” (a “VCOC”). Generally, in order to qualify as a VCOC, an entity must demonstrate on its “initial valuation date” and on at least one day within each “annual valuation period,” at least 50% of its assets, valued at cost (other than short-term investments pending long-term commitment or distribution to investors), are invested in operating companies (other than VCOCs) (i.e., operating entities that (x) are primarily engaged directly, or through a majority owned subsidiary or subsidiaries, in the production or sale of a product or service other than the investment of capital, or (y) qualify as “real estate operating companies,” as defined in the Plan Assets Regulation) in which such entity has direct contractual management rights. In addition, to qualify as a VCOC, an entity must, in the ordinary course of its business, actually exercise such management rights with respect to at least one of the operating companies in which it invests. Similarly, the term “operating company” in the Plan Assets Regulation includes an entity that qualifies as a “real estate operating company” (“REOC”). An entity should qualify as a REOC if (i) on its “initial valuation date” and on at least one day within each “annual valuation period,” at least 50% of the entity’s assets, valued at cost (other than short-term investments pending long-term commitment or distribution to investors) are invested in real estate that is managed or developed and with respect to which such entity has the right to substantially participate directly in management or development activities; and (ii) such entity in the ordinary course of its business is engaged directly in the management and development of real estate during specified periods. The “initial valuation date” is the date on which the entity first makes an investment that is not a short-term investment of funds pending long-term commitment. An entity’s “annual valuation period” is a pre-established period not exceeding 90 days in duration, which begins no later than the anniversary of the entity’s initial valuation date. The Plan Assets Regulation does not provide specific guidance regarding what rights will qualify as management rights, and the U.S. Department of Labor has consistently taken the position that such determination can only be made in light of the surrounding facts and circumstances of each particular case, substantially limiting the degree to which it can be determined with certainty whether particular rights will satisfy this requirement.

In order to prevent the application of ERISA to our company, we may seek to qualify as either a VCOC or a REOC. In order to qualify as a VCOC we must make our first investment in an operating company, which may include an investment in a REOC, and with respect to which we retain the right to substantially participate in management activities. In addition, to maintain our status as a VCOC, during each subsequent annual valuation period at least 50% of our assets valued at cost much be invested in operating companies with respect to which we retain the direct right to participate in management or development activities and we must have exercised our participation rights with respect to at least one qualifying investment. In order to qualify as a REOC we must make our first investment in real estate, which is managed or developed, and with respect to which we retain the direct right to participate in management and development activities. To maintain our status as a REOC, during each subsequent annual valuation period at least 50% of our assets valued at cost much be invested in real estate which is managed or developed and with respect to which we retain the direct right to participate in management or development activities. If we fail to make a proper first investment or fail to meet the test during any subsequent annual valuation period, we will fail to qualify as a VCOC or REOC, as applicable, and our assets could be considered plan assets subject to the requirements of ERISA unless another exception applies. During any period in which we cannot qualify or either cannot or choose not to continue to qualify as either a VCOC or REOC, we may seek to avoid the application of ERISA pursuant to the 25% Test or the publicly offered securities exemptions from the application of ERISA.

For purposes of the 25% Test, the assets of an entity will not be treated as “plan assets” if, immediately after the most recent acquisition of any equity interest in the entity, less than 25% of the total value of each class of equity interest in the entity is held by “benefit plan investors,” excluding equity interests held by persons (other than benefit plan investors) with discretionary authority or control over the assets of the entity or who provide investment advice for a fee (direct or indirect) with respect to such assets, and any affiliates thereof. The term “benefit plan investors” is generally defined to include employee benefit plans subject to Title I of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code (including “Keogh” plans and IRAs), as well as any entity whose underlying assets include plan assets by reason of a plan’s investment in such entity (e.g., an entity of which 25% or more of the total value of any class of equity interests is held by benefit plan investors and which does not satisfy another exception under ERISA). Our decision to comply with the 25% Test may result in limiting the availability of our securities with respect to benefit plan investors and/or require the redemption of securities held by benefit plan investors in order to avoid the application of ERISA.

We will not be an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

Under the Plan Assets Regulation, a “publicly-offered security” is a security that is (a) “freely transferable,” (b) part of a class of securities that is “widely held,” and (c) (i) sold to the Covered Plan as part of an offering of securities to the public pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the class of securities to which such security is a part is registered under the Exchange Act within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year of the issuer during which the offering of such securities to the public has occurred, or (ii) is part of a class of securities that is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

Accordingly, prospective investors that are (i) “employee benefit plans” (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA), which are subject to Title I of ERISA, (ii) “plans” defined in Section 4975 of the Code, which are subject to Section 4975 of the Code (including “Keogh” plans and “individual retirement accounts”), or (iii) entities whose underlying assets are deemed to include plan assets within the meaning of Section 3(42) of ERISA and the regulations thereunder (e.g., an entity of which 25% or more of the total value of any class of equity interests is held by “benefit plan investors”) (each such plan, account and entity described in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) we refer to as “Covered Plans”) should consult with their own legal, tax, financial and other advisors prior to investing to review these implications in light of such investor’s particular circumstances. The sale of our common stock to any Covered Plan is in no respect a representation by us or any other person associated with the offering of our shares of common stock that such an investment meets all relevant legal requirements with respect to investments by plans generally or any particular plan, or that such an investment is appropriate for plans generally or any particular plan.

Estimated Use of Proceeds

The following tables present information about the net proceeds raised in this offering for each class, assuming that we sell the maximum primary offering amount of $4,000,000,000 and no shares under our distribution reinvestment plan. The tables assume that 5% of our gross offering proceeds are from the sale of Class T shares, 50% of our gross offering proceeds are from the sale of Class S shares, 10% of our gross offering proceeds are from the sale of Class D shares and 35% of our gross offering proceeds are from the sale of Class I shares. The number of shares of each class sold and the relative proportions in which the classes of shares are sold are uncertain and may differ significantly from what is shown in the tables below. The following tables do not include Class E shares, Class A-I shares or Class A-II shares of our common stock or Class E units of the Operating Partnership or other classes of shares of our common stock or units of the Operating Partnership units we determine to offer in separate private transactions.

We may reallocate the shares of our common stock we are offering between the primary offering and our distribution reinvestment plan. We will only use the proceeds raised in this offering for the purposes set forth in this prospectus and in a manner within the investment guidelines approved by our board of directors, who serve as fiduciaries to our stockholders.

The actual amount of upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees, however, will vary from the estimated amounts shown because (1) our Class T, Class S and Class D shares are sold at a price that varies monthly generally based on our prior month’s NAV per share for that class of shares and actual upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees per Class T, Class S and Class D share are a percentage of the transaction price and (2) the upfront selling commission and dealer manager fees may be reduced in connection with certain categories of sales of Class T, Class S and Class D shares. Any reduction in upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees will be accompanied by a corresponding reduction in the Class T, Class S and Class D per share purchase price to the applicable stockholder, but will not affect the amounts available to us for investment. Because amounts in this table are estimates, they may not accurately reflect the actual receipt or use of the offering proceeds.

We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to (1) make investments in accordance with our investment strategy and policies, (2) reduce borrowings and repay indebtedness incurred under various financing agreements we may enter into and (3) fund repurchases under our share repurchase plan. Generally, our policy will be to pay distributions from cash flow from operations. However, subject to Maryland law and the discretion of our board of directors, we may choose to use cash flows from the sale of or repayment of our assets, borrowings, offering proceeds, the deferral of fees and expense reimbursements or other sources to fund distributions to our stockholders.

The following table presents information regarding the use of proceeds raised in this offering with respect to Class T shares.

The following table presents information regarding the use of proceeds raised in this offering with respect to Class S shares.

The following table presents information regarding the use of proceeds raised in this offering with respect to Class D shares.

The following table presents information regarding the use of proceeds raised in this offering with respect to Class I shares.

____________________________

(1) Gross offering proceeds include upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees that the Dealer Manager is entitled to receive (including any amounts that may be retained by, or reallowed (paid) to, selected dealers). We intend to conduct a continuous offering of an unlimited number of shares of our common stock over an unlimited time period by filing a new registration statement prior to the end of the three-year period described in Rule 415 under the Securities Act; however, in certain states this offering is subject to annual extensions.

(2)The table assumes that 5% of our gross offering proceeds are from the sale of Class T shares, 50% of our gross offering proceeds are from the sale of Class S shares, 10% of our gross offering proceeds are from the sale of Class D shares and 35% of our gross offering proceeds are from the sale of Class I shares. For Class T shares, includes upfront selling commissions of 3.0% of the transaction price and upfront dealer manager fees of 0.5% of the transaction price, however, such amounts may vary at certain selected dealers provided that the sum will not exceed 3.5% of the transaction price. For Class S shares, includes upfront selling commissions of 3.5% of the transaction price. For Class D shares, includes upfront selling commissions of 1.5% of the transaction price. Amounts presented in the tables are less than 3.5% of gross proceeds because upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees are calculated as 3.5% of the transaction price (which excludes upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees), which means that upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees expressed as a percentage of the total investment (including upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees) are less than 3.5%. We will also pay the following selling commissions over time as distribution fees to the Dealer Manager, subject to FINRA limitations on underwriting compensation: (a) for Class T shares only, a representative distribution fee of 0.65% per annum, and a dealer distribution fee of 0.20% per annum, of the aggregate NAV for the Class T shares, however, with respect to Class T shares sold through certain selected dealers, the representative distribution fee and the dealer distribution fee may be other amounts, provided that the sum of such fees will always equal 0.85% per annum of the NAV of such shares, (b) for Class S shares only, a distribution fee equal to 0.85% per annum of the aggregate NAV for the Class S shares and (c) for Class D shares only, a distribution fee equal to 0.25% per annum of the aggregate NAV for the Class D shares, in each case, payable monthly. The distribution fees are selling commissions paid over time. The total amount that will be paid over time for distribution fees depends on the average length of time for which shares remain outstanding, the term over which such amount is measured and the performance of our investments, and is not expected to be paid from sources other than cash flow from operating activities. See “Plan of Distribution—Underwriting Compensation—Upfront Selling Commissions and Dealer Manager Fees” and “Compensation—Distribution fees.”

(3)Our Adviser has agreed to advance all of our organization and offering expenses on our behalf through March 19, 2027, the third anniversary of the date on which we broke escrow for this offering. We will reimburse our Adviser for such advanced expenses ratably over the 60 months following March 19, 2027. We will reimburse our Adviser for any subsequent organization and offering expenses it incurs on our behalf as and when incurred. The organization and offering expense numbers shown above represent our estimates of expenses to be incurred by us in connection with this offering and include estimated dealer manager expenses reimbursable by us. See “Compensation—Organization and Offering Expense Reimbursement” for examples of the types of organization and offering expenses we may incur.

In the aggregate, underwriting compensation from all sources, including upfront selling commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution fees and other underwriting compensation, will not exceed 10% of the gross proceeds from our primary public offering.

Investment Objectives

Our investment objectives are to invest in assets that will enable us to:

We cannot assure you that we will achieve our investment objectives. In particular, we note that the NAV of non-traded REITs may be subject to volatility related to the values of their underlying assets, and appraisal-based valuations are estimates of fair value and may not necessarily correspond to realizable value. See the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus.

Investment Strategy

Our investment strategy is to acquire primarily stabilized, income-oriented commercial real estate in the United States, with an emphasis on properties that can leverage EQT Real Estate’s scale and long-standing direct leasing relationships with Fortune 1000 companies.

We will seek to generate strong income returns and potential appreciation by:

To a lesser extent, we also plan to invest in real estate related securities to provide a source of liquidity for our share repurchase plan, cash management and other purposes.

Potential Competitive Strengths

We believe our most compelling potential competitive strength is our relationship with EQT Real Estate, a premier investment manager and, of crucial importance, a vertically integrated operator built on the talent and experience of an extensive network of “hyper-local” real estate professionals. As a trusted real estate solutions provider to leading corporate tenants, EQT Real Estate’s deep understanding of how and where tenants want to use physical space to support their respective businesses is the crux of EQT Real Estate’s success through multiple market cycles.

EQT Real Estate’s global real estate platform has managed direct property funds since 2006 and currently has over $53 billion in assets (gross asset value) 8 managed by over 400 professionals in over 50 global offices across the United States, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Continental Europe and the Asia-Pacific region as of December 31, 2025. We believe our long-term success in executing our investment strategy will be supported by EQT Real Estate’s potential competitive strengths, which include:

Long History of Real Estate Investing

EQT Real Estate has established a 19-year investment track record encompassing over 2,500 properties, over 40,000 multifamily units and over 620 million square feet since inception in the United States, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region across core, core-plus and value-add investment strategies.8 Currently, EQT Real Estate manages more than $53 billion of total property gross asset value across industrial, office, multifamily and other investments.8

As of December 31, 2025, EQT Real Estate’s investments, which may include multiple properties and land for development, since inception include:

Active Operator Platform Drives Execution

EQT Real Estate believes a key to the organization’s success and demonstrated ability to produce consistent returns lies in its decentralized, hands-on operating platform that does not rely on third parties to lease and manage its properties. We believe EQT Real Estate is truly differentiated in this respect relative to its peers.

Tenant Relationships Provide Competitive Advantage in Acquisitions and Leasing

We expect to capitalize on EQT Real Estate’s “tenant-centric” philosophy whereby customer demand, discussions with corporate executives, and up-to-the-minute information from corporate heads of real estate and their tenant broker representatives will strongly influence our investment and property operating decisions. We believe the knowledge gained through EQT Real Estate’s presence in the field and frequent communication with tenants leads to an improved understanding of the functionality and locations that tenants most desire.

We expect EQT Real Estate’s over 1,500 tenant relationships to continue to grow. These relationships are time-consuming and expensive to cultivate (given the human resource investment in numerous senior-level, regional personnel), providing a competitive advantage that is difficult to replicate.

For EQT Real Estate’s most important tenant relationships, the firm employs dedicated account managers who serve as a single point of contact for the tenant in communicating their real estate needs and securing multiple locations globally. This sales service is emblematic of EQT Real Estate’s reputation among tenants as being a real estate solutions provider across numerous geographies and across corporate space requirements.

Dedicated and Cohesive Team

Averaging over 28 years of real estate experience, EQT Real Estate’s senior management has served as fiduciaries to institutional investors throughout multiple real estate market cycles.

Since forming EQT Real Estate in 2006, the six-person management team has fostered a culture that is characterized by a commitment to each other and the firm's investors. The average tenure of this team at EQT Real Estate is 12 years, reflecting the cohesion of the original members and the retention and promotion of subsequent members. Notably, the management team has worked together on average for nearly 16 years including time spent working together at prior employers, in the same types of investment and operating roles they have assumed at EQT Real Estate, under shared business and personal philosophies that are centered on entrepreneurism, dedication and forthrightness.

This long-ingrained culture was a key consideration for the EQT Real Estate senior management team in deciding to combine its business with EQT in April 2021. EQT holds similar core beliefs centered on active value creation, a hands-on “locals-with-locals” mindset and a founding ethos of service and stewardship.

Extensive Industry Relationships Built at the Local and National Levels

As a result of EQT Real Estate’s direct, local presence afforded by the firm’s numerous regional offices, combined with the senior management team’s 28-year average tenure as real estate specialists, EQT Real Estate has developed an extensive network of relationships with owners, leasing and investment sales brokerage firms, bankers, investment professionals, lenders, attorneys, consultants, and planners who serve as a source of investment opportunities.

Over the years, EQT Real Estate believes that it has instilled a sense of confidence, integrity and performance in these many types of relationships due to the speed and accuracy of its bid pricing, strong equity and debt capitalization enabled by its existing closed-end fund business, and thus reliability of closing at the agreed-upon pricing and timing. As a result, EQT Real Estate believes it is often given a first look (or more importantly, the “last look”) at investment opportunities compared to other organizations or competitors.

Extensive Institutional Investor Experience

EQT Real Estate currently serves more than 245 institutional investors as well as investors in us who have entrusted over $35 billion in equity as of December 31, 2025 to the firm’s investment vehicles and managed accounts in the Americas, Europe and Asia; in industrial/logistics, multifamily/living, and other property types; and in core, core-plus and value-add investment strategies. Our prominent investor partners have included sovereign wealth funds, public pensions, corporate/trade pensions, endowments and foundations, insurance companies, banks, multi-manager funds, family investment offices, and private wealth platforms.

As such, for over 19 years, EQT Real Estate has cultivated a reputation as an experienced institutional manager that consistently provides clients with high-quality financial statements, communication and transparency.

Multiple Market Cycle Experience

During the past 30 years, EQT Real Estate’s seasoned management team has worked through multiple real estate and capital market cycles. During previous market upswings, team members held senior roles in private real estate partnerships and publicly traded REITs. During the 2008-2010 recession, the management team stewarded Exeter Industrial Value Fund I, the first in a series of closed-end value-add real estate investment funds, amid severe and systemic market turmoil, and during the 2020-2021 COVID-19 pandemic the team managed a collective portfolio of nearly 250 million square feet through uncertainty in tenant demand and a sudden halt in the availability of financing. Collectively, EQT Real Estate believes these experiences have resulted in a highly relevant knowledge base that has been instrumental in driving occupancy during periods of intense competition for tenants and later driving rental rate increases during growth cycles.

Delivering Sustainability Impact

EQT Real Estate’s approach to sustainability is informed by and aligned with EQT’s mission to future-proof companies and contribute to long-term sustainable growth. With a dedicated sustainability team, EQT Real Estate applies this thinking to the needs and opportunities specific to our real estate investment management and property operations.

EQT Real Estate will prioritize sustainability to align with tenant demand in our target markets for sustainable, efficient and healthy places to do business and live. Additionally, we will align our sustainability actions to improvement opportunities as part of our investment strategy. These activities may include the following:

Investment Guidelines and Portfolio Allocation

Our board of directors, including our independent directors, will review our investment portfolio not less than quarterly. In addition, our board of directors has adopted investment guidelines which set forth, among other things, guidelines for investing in our targeted property types and certain investment policies restricting certain types of investments which we describe in more detail

below. Our board of directors, including our independent directors, will review the investment guidelines on an annual basis or more frequently as it deems appropriate. Changes to our investment guidelines must be approved by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors. Our board of directors may revise our investment guidelines without the concurrence of our stockholders. However, our board of directors will not amend our charter, including any investment policies that are provided in our charter and described under “Charter-Imposed Investment Limitations” below, without the concurrence of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, except for amendments that do not adversely affect the rights, preferences and privileges of our stockholders and do not require stockholder approval under Maryland law.

Our investment guidelines delegate to our Adviser authority to execute acquisitions and dispositions of investments in real estate and real estate related securities, in each case so long as such acquisitions and dispositions are consistent with the investment guidelines adopted by our board of directors. Our board of directors will at all times have oversight over our investments and may change from time to time the scope of authority delegated to our Adviser with respect to acquisition and disposition transactions. In addition, under our investment guidelines our board of directors is required to approve any acquisition of a single property or portfolio of properties with a purchase price exceeding 10% of our most recent month-end total asset value (as measured under GAAP) plus the net proceeds expected in good faith to be raised in our public and private offerings over the next 12 months. A majority of our board of directors will periodically determine that the consideration paid for properties we acquire will ordinarily be based on the fair market value of the properties. If a majority of our independent directors determines, or if the property is acquired from our Adviser, a director, EQT or any of their affiliates, such fair market value shall be determined by a qualified independent appraiser selected by our independent directors.

After our ramp-up period, we will generally seek to invest:

Of our investments in properties, we will generally seek to invest approximately 80% in properties with business tenants (“business-to-business” or “B2B” property types) within our primary investment focus, such as industrial/logistics supply chain or data centers, and approximately 20% in office/life science properties and real estate assets with consumer users (“business-to-consumer” or “B2C” property types), such as multifamily/living or self-storage properties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the actual percentage of our portfolio that is invested in properties or real estate related securities may from time to time be outside the levels provided above due to factors such as a large inflow of capital over a short period of time, our Adviser’s assessment of the relative attractiveness of opportunities, or an increase in anticipated cash requirements or repurchase requests and subject to any limitations or requirements relating to our intention to qualify to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Certain investments, such as preferred equity investments, could be characterized as either real estate or real estate related securities for purposes of our target allocation depending on the terms and characteristics of such investments.

We do not expect to be able to achieve these allocations until we have completed our ramp-up period. We will consider our ramp-up period to end after we have raised substantial offering proceeds and acquired a broad portfolio of equity real estate investments. Prior to that time, we will balance the goal of achieving our portfolio allocation targets with the goal of carefully evaluating and selecting investment opportunities to maximize risk-adjusted returns. Following the end of our ramp-up period, we believe that the size of our portfolio of investments should be sufficient for our Adviser to adhere more closely to our allocation targets, although we cannot predict how long our ramp-up period will last and cannot provide assurances that we will be able to raise sufficient offering proceeds to achieve our targeted portfolio allocation.

Identification of Investments

As our adviser, EQT Real Estate has the authority to implement our investment strategy, as determined by, and subject to the direction of, our board of directors.

As a result of EQT Real Estate’s direct, local presence afforded by the firm’s numerous regional offices, combined with the senior management team’s 28 year average tenure as commercial real estate specialists, EQT Real Estate has developed an extensive network of relationships with owners, leasing and investment sales brokerage firms, bankers, investment professionals, lenders, attorneys, consultants and planners who serve as a source of investment opportunities.

EQT Real Estate believes that an ever-increasing amount of investment sourcing can be attributed to the team’s large and expanding base of tenant relationships, which have grown in tandem with the firm’s properties under management. EQT Real Estate is among the largest owners of industrial real estate in the world and, because it leases its own space, directly holds over 1,500 tenant relationships, including long-standing direct leasing relationships with Fortune 1000 companies.

These relationships are expected to provide us with (i) sourcing opportunities when corporations dispose of real estate assets due to mergers or facility consolidation and (ii) leasing opportunities given corporations’ changing and expanding property needs.

Over the years, EQT Real Estate believes that it has instilled a sense of confidence, integrity and performance in these many types of relationships due to the speed and accuracy of its bid pricing, strong equity and debt capitalization enabled by the scale of its global investment platform, and thus reliability of closing at the agreed-upon pricing and timing. As a result, EQT Real Estate believes it is often given a first look (or more importantly, the “last look”) at investment opportunities compared to other organizations or competitors.

Investments in Properties

We intend to invest in primarily stabilized, income-oriented commercial real estate in the United States in a range of asset types, which may include a primary focus on themes that benefit the most from EQT Real Estate’s extensive experience as a real estate solutions provider to large corporate tenants.

Primary Themes

Industrial

1) Supply Chain

Having been an early proponent of and one of the largest investors in industrial/logistics properties (1,100 investments / 516 million square feet / $40.5 billion of Total Cost as of December 31, 2025)12, EQT Real Estate is uniquely positioned to address what it believes to be a long-term fundamental shift in the consumption of goods, driven chiefly by e-commerce adoption and increasingly demanding and dynamic consumer preferences. Further, we expect additional opportunities from the growing trend of “on shoring” back to the United States, particularly in strategic sectors as companies look to strengthen their local supply chains to weather increasingly volatile global supply chains.

Accordingly, industrial/logistics property acquisitions may include, but not be limited to, the following: distribution and storage properties across the industrial supply chain, such as big-box warehouse, last-mile warehouse, cold-storage, light industrial, flex/office-warehouse, industrial service facilities and industrial outdoor storage properties.

2) Data Centers

EQT Real Estate is uniquely positioned to leverage the expertise of EQT, a global leader in the acquisitions of digital infrastructure companies having invested over €13 billion in the sector since inception, including EQT portfolio company, EdgeConnex, a global operator of data centers. Data centers benefit from strong secular demand driven by cloud adoption, proliferation of AI, and digitalization across industries, combined with typically high credit tenants and long-duration leases, making them an attractive addition to EQT Real Estate’s industrial property sector focus. In the context of an income focused real estate fund, EQT Real Estate will target long-term leased data centers, and will seek to leverage, where possible, its unique relationship with EdgeConnex.

Accordingly, data center industrial property acquisitions may include, but not be limited to, the following: stabilized hyperscaler, colocation and edge data centers, sale-lease back transactions with enterprise users or service providers, and joint-venture structures with operators.

Secondary Themes

Consumer-Centric

To a lesser degree, we may invest in “consumer-leased” or “consumer-centric” property types, such as multifamily/living, self-storage, grocery retail and hospitality assets. These property types may offer portfolio diversification through demand drivers anchored in household formation, demographic patterns, and daily-needs services that complement our primary themes.

Knowledge Economy Office

While EQT Real Estate believes the “work-from-home” trend will likely have a long-term impact on office usage, EQT Real Estate, informed by the breadth of its direct corporate tenant relationships, believes that well-located, modern and appropriately amenitized workspace will be critical for the productivity needs of innovation-driven, collaboration-dependent businesses typically found in the knowledge economy. Further, certain knowledge economy industries need intensive research and development and specialized equipment better suited to controlled commercial environments.

Accordingly, office property acquisitions may include, but not be limited to, the following: research and development campuses, laboratory workspace, medical office, biomanufacturing facilities, creative office, headquarters and single-tenant office space.

Geography

Where applicable and dependent on the unique demand and supply drivers of the underlying property type, EQT Real Estate intends to target locations for all themes in research and creative economy hubs throughout the United States that benefit from secular trends in technology, life sciences, healthcare and higher education job growth and investments.

Ownership Interests

Our Operating Partnership or one or more subsidiary entities controlled by our Operating Partnership will acquire properties on our behalf. In many cases, we will acquire the entire equity ownership interest in properties and exercise control over such properties. However, we may also enter into joint ventures, general partnerships, co-tenancies and other participation arrangements with other investors, including affiliates of our Adviser, to acquire properties. We generally will acquire fee simple interests for the properties (in which we own both the land and the building improvements), but we have invested in an industrial property that is subject to a ground lease and in the future may acquire leasehold interests and other non-fee simple interests if we believe the investment is consistent with our investment strategy and objectives.

Joint Ventures and Other Co-Ownership Arrangements

We may acquire properties through one or more joint ventures, partnerships, tenant-in-common or other co-ownership arrangements, which may be with affiliates of our Adviser or with non-affiliated third parties. Any joint venture with an affiliate of our Adviser must be approved by a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us and on substantially the same, or more favorable, terms and conditions as those received by other joint venture partners. In many cases, we may not control the management of joint ventures in which we invest, but we may have the right to approve major decisions of the joint venture. We will not participate in joint ventures in which we do not have or share control to the extent that we believe such participation would potentially threaten our status as a non-investment company exempt from the Investment Company Act. This may prevent us from receiving an allocation with respect to certain investment opportunities that are suitable for both us and one or more Other EQT Real Estate Accounts, including ones with similar investment objectives and strategies as us.

A joint venture creates an alignment of interest with a private source of capital for the benefit of our stockholders. In determining whether to invest in a particular joint venture, our Adviser will evaluate the real property that such joint venture owns or is being formed to own under the same criteria described elsewhere in this prospectus for our selection of real property investments.

The terms of any particular joint venture will be established on a case-by-case basis considering all relevant facts, including the nature and attributes of the potential joint venture partner, the proposed structure of the joint venture, the nature of the operations, the liabilities and assets associated with the proposed joint venture and the size of our interest in the venture. Other factors we will consider include: (1) our ability to manage and control the joint venture; (2) our ability to exit the joint venture; and (3) our ability to control transfers of interests held by other partners to the venture. Our interests may not be totally aligned with those of our partner. See “General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate—We may make a substantial amount of joint venture investments, including with affiliates of our Adviser. Joint venture investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on the financial condition of our joint venture partners and disputes between us and our joint venture partners.”

In the event that the joint venture partner elects to sell property held in any such joint venture, we may not have sufficient funds to exercise any right of first refusal or other purchase right that we may have. Entering into joint ventures with affiliates of our Adviser will result in certain conflicts of interest. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest.”

Due Diligence

Comprehensive due diligence is conducted on each property that our Adviser proposes to purchase on our behalf, including these four primary types:

Our Adviser would not move forward on an investment if it does not satisfy its investment criteria.

Property Management, Leasing, and Development and Construction Services

As discussed above under “—Potential Competitive Strengths,” EQT Real Estate believes its success is deeply rooted in its “tenant-centric” philosophy, which prioritizes direct tenant dialogue through in-house leasing, development and property management with teams specializing in specific property sectors and markets. Affiliates of our Adviser have extensive experience in providing responsive and professional property management and leasing services as well as development and construction services. We have retained, and expect to retain in the future, an affiliate of our Adviser to provide property management and leasing services for most, if not all, of the properties we acquire and to provide development and construction services as needed. See “Management—Property Management, Leasing, and Development and Construction Services by Affiliates of our Adviser.”

Although we currently expect that affiliates of our Adviser will provide property management and leasing services for the properties we acquire, it is possible that from time to time we may engage third-party management companies to manage certain of our properties or third-party leasing agents to lease vacancies in certain properties. These management companies may be our partners in joint ventures that we enter into. If we engage third-party management companies or leasing agents, it will be the responsibility of our Adviser to provide oversight of these companies; however, these companies would have significant day-to-day decision-making authority with respect to the properties they are engaged to manage or lease.

Exit Strategies

Our investment strategy is not reliant on the prompt sale of the properties we acquire, and we anticipate that we will hold most properties for five to ten years. One of our Adviser’s primary considerations in evaluating any potential investment opportunity is the likely exit strategy. When determining whether to sell a particular asset, our Adviser will take the following steps:

We believe that holding our target assets for a long period of time will enable us to execute our business plan, generate favorable cash-on-cash returns and drive long-term cash flow and NAV growth.

Generally, we will reinvest proceeds from the sale, financing or disposition of properties in a manner consistent with our investment strategy, although we may be required to distribute such proceeds to the stockholders in order to comply with REIT requirements.

Real Estate Related Securities

We believe that our real estate related securities, combined with our investments in cash, cash equivalents and other short-term investments (described below under “—Cash, Cash Equivalents and Other Short-Term Investments”), will serve as a cash management or liquidity strategy before investing offering proceeds into longer-term real estate assets. Subject to applicable law, our real estate related securities could be used, in part, to maintain appropriate liquidity levels to provide funds to satisfy repurchase requests under our share repurchase plan that we chose to satisfy in any particular month. Our real estate related securities may include the following, to the extent consistent with our intended qualification as a REIT, (i) equity securities of other REITs and real estate companies, (ii) debt issued by REITs as well as other corporate debt and (iii) agency and non-agency RMBS, CMBS, CLOs, and CDOs.

We may invest in securities that are unregistered (but are eligible for purchase and sale by certain qualified institutional buyers) or are held by control persons of the issuer and securities that are subject to contractual restrictions on their resale.

We may only invest in equity securities if a majority of our directors, including a majority of the independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction approves such investment as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable. Pursuant to our investment guidelines, we consider any purchase of regularly traded equity securities at market prices to be fair, competitive and commercially reasonable.

We do not intend that our investments in real estate related securities will require us to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, and we intend to generally divest appropriate securities before any such registration would be required.

On July 11, 2023, our Adviser and the Operating Partnership entered into the Investment Management Agreement with JP Morgan. Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, JP Morgan will serve as a sub-advisor to our Adviser and act as the investment manager for our portfolio of short-term investments, which may include real estate related securities. Under the terms of the Investment Management Agreement, JP Morgan’s fee for its services shall be paid entirely by our Adviser and not by our company.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We may use derivatives for hedging purposes and, subject to qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT and compliance with any applicable exemption from being regulated as a commodity pool operator, we may also use derivatives for investment purposes and as a form of effective leverage. Our principal investments in derivative instruments may include investments in interest rate swaps, total return swaps, credit default swaps and indices thereon, and short sales (typically related to treasuries), but we may also invest in futures transactions, options and options on futures. See “Risk Factors—We may invest in derivatives, which involve numerous risks.”

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Other Short-Term Investments

We hold cash, cash equivalents and other short-term investments. These types of investments may include the following, to the extent consistent with our intended qualification as a REIT:

Other Investments

We may, subject to any required approvals from our board of directors, make investments other than as described above. At all times, we intend to make investments in such a manner consistent with qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT under the Code and maintaining our status as a non-investment company under the Investment Company Act. We do not intend to underwrite securities of other issuers.

Borrowing Policies

We use financial leverage to provide additional funds to support our investment activities. This allows us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, resulting in a broader portfolio. Subject to the limitation on indebtedness for money borrowed in our charter described below, our target leverage ratio after our ramp-up period is approximately 50% to 60%. Our leverage ratio is measured by dividing (i) consolidated property-level and entity-level debt net of cash and loan-related restricted cash, by (ii) the asset value of real estate investments (measured using the greater of fair market value and cost) plus the equity in our real estate related securities portfolio. There is, however, no limit on the amount we may borrow with respect to any individual property or portfolio. We will consider our ramp-up period to end after we have raised substantial offering proceeds and acquired a broad portfolio of equity real estate investments. Prior to that time, we will balance the goal of achieving our target leverage ratio with the goal of carefully evaluating and selecting investment opportunities to maximize risk-adjusted returns. We cannot predict how long our ramp-up period will last and cannot provide assurances that we will be able to raise substantial offering proceeds. Indebtedness incurred (i) in connection with funding a deposit in advance of the closing of an investment or (ii) as other working capital advances, will not be included as part of the calculation above.

Our real estate related securities portfolio may have embedded leverage through the use of derivatives, including, but not limited to, total return swaps, securities lending arrangements and credit default swaps. During times of increased investment and capital market activity, but subject to the limitation on indebtedness for money borrowed in our charter described below, we may employ greater leverage in order to quickly build a broader portfolio of assets. We may leverage our portfolio by assuming or incurring secured or unsecured property-level or entity-level debt. An example of property-level debt is a mortgage loan secured by an individual property or portfolio of properties incurred or assumed in connection with our acquisition of such property or portfolio of properties. An example of entity-level debt is a line of credit obtained by us or our Operating Partnership. We may seek to obtain lines of credit under which we would reserve borrowing capacity. Borrowings under lines of credit may be used not only to repurchase shares, but also to fund acquisitions or for any other corporate purpose.

Our actual leverage level will be affected by a number of factors, some of which are outside our control. Significant inflows of proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock generally will cause our leverage as a percentage of our net assets, or our leverage ratio, to decrease, at least temporarily. Significant outflows of equity as a result of repurchases of shares of our common stock generally will cause our leverage ratio to increase, at least temporarily. Our leverage ratio will also increase or decrease with decreases or increases, respectively, in the value of our portfolio. If we borrow under a line of credit to fund repurchases of shares of our common stock or for other purposes, our leverage would increase and may exceed our target leverage. In such cases, our leverage may remain at the higher level until we receive additional net proceeds from our continuous offering or sell some of our assets to repay outstanding indebtedness.

Our board of directors reviews our aggregate borrowings at least quarterly. In connection with such review, our board of directors may determine to modify our target leverage ratio in light of then-current economic conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, fair values of our properties, general conditions in the market for debt and equity securities, growth and investment opportunities or other factors. We may exceed our targeted leverage ratio at times if our Adviser deems it advisable for us. For example, if we fund a repurchase under a line of credit, we will consider actual borrowings when determining whether we are at our leverage target, but not unused borrowing capacity. If, therefore, we are at a leverage ratio in the range of 50% to 60% and we borrow additional amounts under a line of credit, or if the value of our portfolio decreases, our leverage could exceed the range of 50% to 60% of our gross real estate assets. In the event that our leverage ratio exceeds our target, regardless of the reason, we will thereafter endeavor to manage our leverage back down to our target.

Under our charter we may not incur indebtedness for money borrowed in an amount exceeding 300% of the cost of our net assets, which approximates borrowing 75% of the cost of our investments, unless any excess over this limit is approved by a majority of our independent directors, and disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with justification for such excess. This limitation includes indebtedness for money borrowed with respect to our real estate related securities portfolio. “Net assets” is defined as our total assets other than intangibles valued at cost (prior to deducting depreciation, reserves for bad debts and other non-cash reserves) less total liabilities.

Temporary Strategies

During periods in which our Adviser determines that economic or market conditions are unfavorable to investors and a defensive strategy would benefit us, we may temporarily depart from our investment strategy. During these periods, subject to compliance with the Investment Company Act, we may deviate from our investment guideline of investing at least 80% to 90% of our gross asset value in properties and/or up to 10% to 20% of our gross asset value in real estate related securities, or invest all or any portion of our assets in U.S. government securities, including bills, notes and bonds differing as to maturity and rates of interest that are either issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or by U.S. government agencies or instrumentalities; non-U.S. government securities that have received the highest investment grade credit rating; certificates of deposit issued against funds deposited in a bank or a savings and

loan association; commercial paper; bankers’ acceptances; fixed time deposits; shares of money market funds; credit-linked notes; repurchase agreements with respect to any of the foregoing; or any other fixed income securities that our Adviser considers consistent with this strategy. During these periods, we may also determine to pay down certain of our indebtedness and have indebtedness below our target leverage or we may borrow more to provide for additional liquidity causing us to exceed our target leverage. It is impossible to predict when, or for how long, our Adviser will use these alternative strategies. There can be no assurance that such strategies will be successful.

Issuing Securities for Property

Subject to limitations contained in our charter, we may issue, or cause to be issued, shares of our stock or limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership in any manner (and on such terms and for such consideration) in exchange for real estate. Our existing stockholders will have no preemptive rights to purchase any such shares of our stock or limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership, and any such issuance might cause a dilution of a stockholder’s initial investment. We may enter into additional contractual arrangements with contributors of property under which we would agree to repurchase a contributor’s units for shares of our common stock or cash, at the option of the contributor, at specified times. Although we may enter into such transactions, we do not currently intend to do so.

Charter-Imposed Investment Limitations

Our charter places numerous limitations on us with respect to the manner in which we may invest our funds:

In addition, our charter includes many other investment limitations in connection with transactions with affiliated entities or persons. See “Conflicts of Interest—Certain Conflict Resolution Measures.” Our charter also includes restrictions on roll-up transactions, which are described under “Description of Capital Stock—Restrictions on Roll-Up Transactions.”

Investment Company Act Considerations

We intend to engage primarily in the business of investing in real estate and to conduct our operations so that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries is required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Under the Investment Company Act, in relevant part, a company is an “investment company” if:

We intend to acquire real estate and real estate related securities directly, primarily by acquiring fee interests in real property. We may also invest in real property indirectly through investments in joint venture entities, including joint venture entities in which we do not own a controlling interest. We anticipate that our assets generally will be held in our wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries, each formed to hold a particular asset. A smaller portion of our assets are anticipated to be real estate debt.

We intend to conduct our operations so that we and (except as noted below) our wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries will comply with the 40% test. We will continuously monitor our holdings on an ongoing basis to determine compliance with this test. Except as noted below, we expect that our wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries will not be relying on exemptions under either Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. Consequently, interests in these subsidiaries (which are expected to constitute a substantial majority of our assets) will not constitute “investment securities.” Accordingly, we believe that we and most of our wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries will not be considered an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act.

In addition, (except as noted below) we believe that neither we nor any of our wholly or majority-owned subsidiaries will be considered an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act because we will not engage primarily or hold ourselves out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Rather, we and such subsidiaries will be primarily engaged in non-investment company businesses related to real estate. Consequently, we expect to be able to conduct our operations and such subsidiaries’ operations such that neither we nor they will be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

We will determine whether an entity is a majority-owned subsidiary of our Company. The Investment Company Act defines a majority-owned subsidiary of a person as a company 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of which are owned by such person, or by another company which is a majority-owned subsidiary of such person. The Investment Company Act defines voting securities as any security presently entitling the owner or holder thereof to vote for the election of directors of a company. We treat entities in which we own at least a majority of the outstanding voting securities as majority-owned subsidiaries for purposes of the 40% test. We have not requested that the SEC or its staff approve our treatment of any entity as a majority-owned subsidiary, and neither has done so. If the SEC or its staff was to disagree with our treatment of one or more subsidiary entities as majority-owned subsidiaries, we would need to adjust our strategy and our assets in order to continue to pass the 40% test. Any adjustment in our strategy could have a material adverse effect on us.

If we or any of our wholly or majority-owned subsidiaries would ever fall within one of the definitions of “investment company,” we or the applicable subsidiary may rely on the exemption provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act, which is available for entities “primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and

interests in real estate.” The SEC staff has taken the position that this exemption, in addition to prohibiting the issuance of certain types of securities, generally requires that at least 55% of an entity’s assets must be comprised of mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate, also known as “qualifying assets,” and at least another 25% of the entity’s assets must be comprised of additional qualifying assets or a broader category of assets that we refer to as “real estate related assets” under the Investment Company Act (and no more than 20% of the entity’s assets may be comprised of miscellaneous assets).

We will classify our assets for purposes of our 3(c)(5)(C) exemption based upon no-action positions taken by the SEC staff and interpretive guidance provided by the SEC and its staff. These no-action positions are based on specific factual situations that may be substantially different from the factual situations we may face, and a number of these no-action positions were issued more than 20 years ago. No assurance can be given that the SEC or its staff will concur with our classification of our assets. In addition, the SEC or its staff may, in the future, issue further guidance that may require us to re-classify our assets for purposes of the Investment Company Act. If we were required to re-classify our assets, we might not be in compliance with the exemption from the definition of an investment company provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act.

For purposes of determining whether we satisfy the 55%/25% test, based on the no-action letters issued by the SEC staff, we intend to classify our fee interests in real property, held by us directly or through our wholly owned subsidiaries or controlled subsidiaries as qualifying assets. In addition, based on no-action letters issued by the SEC staff, we will treat our investments in joint ventures, which in turn invest in qualifying assets such as real property, as qualifying assets only if we have the right to approve major decisions by the joint venture; otherwise, they will be classified as real estate related assets. We will not participate in joint ventures in which we do not have or share control to the extent that we believe such participation would potentially threaten our status as a non-investment company exempt from the Investment Company Act. This may prevent us from receiving an allocation with respect to certain investment opportunities that are suitable for both us and one or more Other EQT Real Estate Accounts. We expect that no less than 55% of our assets will consist of investments in real property, including any joint ventures that we control.

We may also use a subsidiary to hold real estate related securities as a cash management or liquidity strategy before investing in longer-term real estate assets or to provide funds to satisfy repurchase requests under our share repurchase plan. If so, such subsidiary may have to rely on the private investment company exceptions under either Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. The full value of our interest in such subsidiary (after taking into account any subsidiary-specific debt) would be treated as an investment security for purposes of determining our compliance with the 40% test.

Qualifying for an exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act will limit our ability to make certain investments. For example, these restrictions may limit our and our subsidiaries’ ability to invest directly in CMBS that represent less than the entire ownership in a pool of mortgage loans, debt and equity tranches of securitizations and certain asset-backed securities, non-controlling equity interests in real estate companies or in assets not related to real estate, however, we and our subsidiaries may invest in such securities to a certain extent.

Although we intend to monitor our portfolio, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain this exemption from registration.

A change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect our ability to avoid registration under the Investment Company Act. To avoid registration, we might be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and might need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we might have to acquire additional assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or might have to forego opportunities to acquire assets that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy.

To the extent that the SEC or its staff provide more specific guidance regarding any of the matters bearing upon the definition of investment company and the exemptions to that definition, we may be required to adjust our strategy accordingly. On August 31, 2011, the SEC issued a concept release and request for comments regarding the Section 3(c)(5)(C) exemption (Release No. IC-29778) in which it contemplated the possibility of issuing new rules or providing new interpretations of the exemption that might, among other things, define the phrase “liens on and other interests in real estate” or consider sources of income in determining a company’s “primary business.” Any additional guidance from the SEC or its staff could provide additional flexibility to us, or it could further inhibit our ability to pursue the strategies we have chosen.

If we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use borrowings), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act) and portfolio composition, including disclosure requirements and restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration and other matters. Compliance with the Investment Company Act would, accordingly, limit our ability to make certain investments and require us to significantly restructure our business plan. For additional discussion of the risks that we would face if we were required to register as an investment company

under the Investment Company Act, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to This Offering and Our Organizational Structure—Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.”

Real Estate Investments

As of December 31, 2025, we owned five industrial properties encompassing in the aggregate approximately 2.6 million rentable square feet. We acquired each of these properties from third parties unaffiliated with us or our Adviser. The following table is a summary of our real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2025: